| Literature DB >> 36188709 |
Wang Yibo1, Yu Bo1, Zhang Jinju1, Tao Zengjie1.
Abstract
Image recognition is the pattern recognition of images. Simply put, it is the prescribed use of the pattern recognition technology in the image. It creates an image recognition template for the input of image information, analyzes and extracts the shape characteristics of the image, and then creates a classifier, relying on the shape of the image classified. However, since particles with high refractive index media can detect galvanic couples and magnetic dipoles together under the excitation of an external field, the interference of the radiation fields of galvanic couples and magnetic dipoles can be used to adjust the incident field. For the study of nanocubes with high refractive index media, the polarization phase of the nanocube particle environment is obtained by the method of long-distance propagation. The loaded micro-slit antenna is also a kind of aperture antenna, which is formed by opening a hole in the metal surface, and the hole will emit electromagnetic waves from the outside of the unit. Loaded micro-slit antennas have a variety of shapes, and they have many advantages such as sturdy structure, fast handling, convenient feeding, and being simple, compact, concealed, and decorative. Therefore, it is necessary to verify various performance parameters of the system by simulating performance tests and to verify the performance of the system by simulating various normal, high load, and abnormal load conditions. The performance test includes load and stress tests, and they can be used together. The purpose of load testing is to clarify the performance of the system under different tasks and to verify the changes in various system performance parameters as the load gradually increases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36188709 PMCID: PMC9522498 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9967681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
The prediction accuracy of different methods under a single hidden layer (%) (number of samples: 1000/200).
| Method | Number of hidden layer nodes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.00 | 200.00 | 300.00 | 400.00 | 500.00 | 600.00 | 700.00 | |
| DBN | 91.5 | 92.5 | 94 | 94.5 | 92.5 | 93 | 93 |
| RBM-SVM | 92 | 93.5 | 93.5 | 93 | 93 | 93 | 93 |
| SVM | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 |
The prediction accuracy of different methods under a single hidden layer (%) (number of samples: 5000/1000).
| Method | Number of hidden layer nodes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.00 | 200.00 | 300.00 | 400.00 | 500.00 | 600.00 | 700.00 | |
| DBN | 93.5 | 92.5 | 93 | 93 | 92.5 | 92 | 97 |
| RBM-SVM | 96 | 97.5 | 92.4 | 90 | 91 | 96 | 91 |
| SVM | 88.1 | 88.1 | 88.1 | 88.1 | 88.1 | 88.1 | 88.1 |
The prediction accuracy of each method when there are two hidden layers (%).
| Method | Number of hidden layer nodes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.00 | 200.00 | 300.00 | 400.00 | 500.00 | 600.00 | 700.00 | |
| DBN | 92.4 | 91.5 | 92 | 92 | 91.5 | 91 | 96 |
| RBM-SVM | 95 | 96.5 | 91.4 | 91.2 | 91.4 | 96 | 91.7 |
Figure 1The relationship between the number of hidden layer nodes and the number of support vectors and the accuracy of prediction.
Relationship between C value and study accuracy when using support vector machine approach.
|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of support vectors | 3110 | 2155 | 1908 | 1806 | 1740 | 1712 | 1712 | 1715 | 1725 |
| Test sample prediction accuracy | 88.1 | 91.2 | 91.4 | 92.3 | 92.3 | 92.3 | 91 | 91.5 | 91.5 |
| Training sample prediction accuracy | 92.7 | 95.76 | 96.85 | 97.61 | 98.25 | 98.4 | 98.83 | 99.21 | 99.5 |
The influence of method C value on accuracy in this paper.
|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of support vectors | 2681 | 27166 | 2718 | 2718 | 2718 | 2718 | 2718 | 2718 | 2718 |
| Test sample prediction accuracy | 95.9 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 97 |
| Training sample prediction accuracy | 99.57 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 2The effect of penalty factor C value on accuracy.
Figure 3Numerical simulation results of scattering spectra of nanocubes.
Figure 4Structure diagram of slot antenna.
Figure 5Influence curve of micro-strip line position on S11.
Figure 6Influence curve of gap position.
Optimized parameters.
| Parameter | Numerical value | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| ws | 35 mm | Media board width ( |
| Is | 24 mm | Media plate length ( |
| xp | 7 mm | Distance from bottom micro-strip line to origin |
| istrip | 8.3 mm | Micro-strip line length ( |
| wstrip | 1.7 mm | Micro-strip line width ( |
| wl | 12.5 mm | Two U-shaped gap distances |
| slitposition | 6 mm | The distance between the bottom of the gap and the origin |
| ss | 1.5 mm | Gap width in |
| sh | 2 mm |
|
| Theta | 70°C | The angle between one side of the fan-shaped terminal branch at the front end of the micro-strip line and the |
| w2 | 3.5 mm | The distance between two U-shaped gaps |
| Istub | 2 mm | The length of the fan-shaped terminal stub at the front end of the micro-strip line |
| hg | 8 mm | The distance between the bottom metal plate and the dielectric plate ( |
| wg | 66 mm | The width of the bottom metal plate ( |