| Literature DB >> 36188357 |
Ruimin Wu1, Yan Gao1, Huaqiong Zhang2, Yijia Chen1, Fan Tan1, Daobing Zeng1, Huabing Wan1, Yi Yang1, Jiaowei Gu3, Zhijun Pei1,4.
Abstract
To explore the cerebral metabolic patterns of cerebral palsy (CP) patients without structural abnormalities by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, we evaluated 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) imaging features in patients. Thirty-one children with CP [Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II-V] showing no structural abnormalities by MRI were enrolled in this study. Regional glucose metabolic activity values were calculated using Scenium software and compared between the right and left cerebral hemispheres. These comparisons revealed asymmetric metabolic reductions in the central region, cerebellum, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe (p < 0.01). We next determined whether averaged brain metabolic activity values in different brain regions correlated with GMFCS levels. The metabolic activity values of basal ganglia, left temporal lobe, and cerebellum correlated negatively with GMFCS scores (all p < 0.05). This method was applied to the left cerebellum, which showed higher metabolic activity values than those in the right cerebellum in most patients (83.8%), and these values also correlated negatively with GMFCS scores (Spearman's r = -0.36, p = 0.01). Differential cortical glucose metabolism by 18F-FDG PET, may help to distinguish between different CP diagnoses that are not detected by MRI.Entities:
Keywords: FDG-PET; GMFCS scores; brain metabolism; cerebral palsy; diagnosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36188357 PMCID: PMC9520285 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.844911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Clinical features of the studied cohort (total number = 31).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 23 |
| Female | 8 | |
| Age | <3 | 10 |
| 3–4 | 15 | |
| >4 | 6 | |
| GMFCS | Level II | 5 |
| Level III | 6 | |
| Level IV | 11 | |
| Level V | 9 |
GMFCS, the Gross Motor Function Classification System.
Cerebral metabolic ratio and asymmetry index in CP patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Basal ganglia | L | 4.54 | 3.49–5.03 | 13 | 18 | −0.33 (−6.92 to 2.6) | 0.40 |
| R | 4.32 | 3.74–5.04 | |||||
| Central region | L | 4.93 | 4.38–5.69 | 24 | 7 | 3.58 (0.2–5.93) | <0.001* |
| R | 4.71 | 4.25–5.34 | |||||
| Cerebellum | L | 3.10 | 2.52–3.8 | 26 | 5 | 5.48 (1.34–8.96) | 0.002* |
| R | 2.98 | 2.53–3.67 | |||||
| CPG | L | 4.88 | 4.34–5.26 | 19 | 12 | 1.4 (−1.32 to 4.12) | 0.13 |
| R | 4.52 | 4.26–5.39 | |||||
| Frontal lobe | L | 4.85 | 4.25–5.58 | 22 | 9 | 2.28 (−1.03 to 3.98) | 0.003* |
| R | 4.74 | 4.23–5.63 | |||||
| Mesial temporal lobe | L | 3.21 | 2.75–3.52 | 14 | 17 | −0.68 (−3.21 to 2.22) | 0.60 |
| R | 3.07 | 2.83–3.55 | |||||
| Occipital lobe | L | 4.99 | 4.43–5.51 | 10 | 21 | −0.17 (−4.85 to 0.58) | 0.13 |
| R | 5.06 | 4.65–5.62 | |||||
| Parietal lobe | L | 5.28 | 4.44–5.69 | 23 | 9 | 1.78 (−0.24 to 3.92) | 0.01* |
| R | 5.10 | 4.33–5.54 | |||||
| Temporal lobe | L | 4.67 | 4.13–5.21 | 17 | 14 | 0.56 (−1.54 to 2.69) | 0.76 |
| R | 4.83 | 4.02–5.51 | |||||
The data are presented as the medians marked with interquartile range. CPG, Cingulate and paracingulate gyri; L, left; R, right; Significance level: *p < 0.05.
Figure 1A representative 18F-FDG brain PET image from a CP child showed the relative higher glucose metabolism in left cortex. Red color indicates relatively high glucose metabolism and blue relatively low in comparison to corresponding regions.
Figure 2Brain 18F-FDG PET images demonstrated different metabolic activity of CP patients with GMFC level II (A) and V (B). The CP patients with GMFC level V exhibited decreased activity compared with GMFC level II.
Association between the regional 18F-FDG uptake as obtained by volume of interest (VOI) analysis and the GMFCS levels of the CP patients (n = 31).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal ganglia | L | 4.4 (3.5–5.3) | 4.9 (4.1–6.2) | 4.6 (4.4–5.1) | 4 (3.4–4.3) | −0.29 |
| R | 4.3 (3.8–6.3) | 5 (4–6.4) | 4.8 (4.3–5) | 3.7 (3.2–4.3) | −0.419* | |
| Avg | 4.3 (3.7–5.8) | 5 (4–6.2) | 4.8 (4.4–5) | 3.6 (3.2–4.4) | −0.384* | |
| Central region | L | 5.8 (4.3–7.7) | 5 (4.4–6.7) | 4.9 (4.4–5.7) | 4.9 (3.2–5.5) | −0.30 |
| R | 6 (4.1–7.7) | 4.8 (4.3–6.4) | 4.7 (4.5–5.3) | 4.4 (3.2–5.1) | −0.33 | |
| Avg | 5.9 (4.2–7.7) | 4.9 (4.3–6.5) | 4.9 (4.5–5.5) | 4.6 (3.2–5.3) | −0.30 | |
| Cerebellum | L | 3.9 (2.8–5) | 3 (2.5–5.1) | 3.1 (2.8–3.8) | 2.7 (2.2–3.2) | −0.369* |
| R | 3.5 (2.6–4.4) | 2.8 (2.4–4.6) | 3.1 (2.6–3.7) | 2.7 (2.4–3.2) | −0.22 | |
| Avg | 3.7 (2.7–4.7) | 2.9 (2.4–4.8) | 3.1 (2.7–3.8) | 2.8 (2.4–3.2) | −0.28 | |
| Cingulate and paracingulate gyri | L | 5.1 (4.3–7.2) | 4.9 (4.3–6.5) | 4.7 (4.6–5.3) | 4.4 (3.2–5.2) | −0.32 |
| R | 5.1 (4.1–7.1) | 4.9 (4.1–6.7) | 4.5 (4.3–5.3) | 4.4 (3.3–5.2) | −0.31 | |
| Avg | 5.1 (4.2–7.2) | 4.9 (4.2–6.6) | 4.6 (4.4–5.3) | 4.6 (3.3–5.2) | −0.32 | |
| Frontal lobe | L | 5.1 (4.1–7.9) | 5.1 (4.5–7.2) | 4.9 (4.6–5.5) | 4.4 (3.6–5.2) | −0.31 |
| R | 5 (4.2–7.6) | 4.9 (4.2–7) | 4.7 (4.4–5.3) | 4.2 (3.4–5.5) | −0.34 | |
| Avg | 5.1 (4.2–7.8) | 5 (4.4–7.1) | 4.8 (4.5–5.4) | 4.3 (3.5–5.4) | −0.35 | |
| Mesial temporal lobe | L | 4 (2.8–4.6) | 3.2 (2.7–4.4) | 3.2 (2.8–3.5) | 2.8 (2.3–3.3) | −0.34 |
| R | 4 (2.8–4.8) | 3.2 (2.7–4.4) | 3.2 (3–3.3) | 2.9 (2.4–3.7) | −0.26 | |
| Avg | 4 (2.8–4.7) | 3.2 (2.7–4.4) | 3.2 (2.9–3.3) | 2.8 (2.4–3.7) | −0.31 | |
| Occipital lobe | L | 5.2 (4.4–7.8) | 5.3 (4.7–7.1) | 5 (4.4–5.5) | 4.6 (3.5–5.2) | −0.388* |
| R | 5.2 (4.4–7.8) | 5.3 (4.8–7.1) | 4.9 (4.7–5.6) | 4.9 (3.3–5.5) | −0.32 | |
| Avg | 5.2 (4.4–7.8) | 5.3 (4.7–7.1) | 4.9 (4.5–5.5) | 4.5 (3.4–5.3) | −0.357* | |
| Parietal lobe | L | 5.4 (4.5–8.1) | 5.3 (4.6–7.1) | 4.9 (4.7–5.5) | 4.9 (3.6–5.6) | −0.26 |
| R | 5.3 (4.4–7.8) | 5.1 (4.5–6.7) | 4.8 (4.5–5.5) | 4.4 (3.5–5.6) | −0.25 | |
| Avg | 5.3 (4.4–7.9) | 5.2 (4.6–6.9) | 4.9 (4.4–5.6) | 4.7 (3.5–5.6) | −0.25 | |
| Temporal lobe | L | 5.1 (4.3–7.9) | 4.8 (4.4–6.8) | 4.7 (4.2–5.6) | 4.1 (3.5–4.8) | −0.413* |
| R | 5.4 (4.2–7.7) | 4.7 (4.3–6.8) | 4.6 (4.3–5.5) | 4 (3.4–5.3) | −0.34 | |
| Avg | 5.3 (4.3–7.8) | 4.7 (4.4–6.8) | 4.7 (4.3–5.6) | 4.1 (3.4–5) | −0.381* | |
The data are presented as the medians marked with interquartile range. The correlation data shown here are Spearman correlation coefficients r. VOI, volume of interest; CPG, Cingulate and paracingulate gyri; L, left; R, right; Avg, Average; Significance level: *p < 0.005.
Figure 3Scatter plots showing the significant correlations between GMFC levels and regional SUVmean in CP patients. (A) The cerebellum, left side: Spearman r = −0.47, p = 0.01. (B) The basal ganglia, right: Spearman r = −0.42, p = 0.02. (C) The occipital lobe, left side: Spearman r = −0.39, p = 0.02. (D) The temporal lobe, left side: Spearman r = −0.41, p = 0.03.
Figure 4CP's disease-related pattern identified by analysis of FDG PET scans from 31 CP patients. The glucose metabolism in the left cerebellum relative higher than the right hemisphere.