Literature DB >> 36188087

Rare triad of fractures in the upper limb. Simultaneous fractures of the distal radius, with the radial head and the ulna styloid.

Mohamed Elgassim1, Ammar AbuAlhaya1, Amro Abdelrahman1, Moayad Elgassim1, Thirumoothy Suresh Kumar1.   

Abstract

We're reporting a 35-year-old gentleman that presented with a rare combination of ipsilateral fracture of both proximal and distal ends of the radius associated with ulna styloid fracture due to a fall with outstretched hands. Thorough clinical examination of 2 adjacent joints (elbow and wrist) is critical in identifying such an unusual or rare combination of injuries. Appropriate management for such cases depends on the characteristics of the injury, such as fracture patterns, job, hand dominance, and age of the patient. The treatment should aim to preserve the radial head to avoid the possibility of proximal radial migration, particularly in young patients. Such a combination of injury implies complex injury and needs special consideration in deciding management plan. In this case, the proximal end of the radius and the ulna styloid fractures were treated conservatively. In contrast, the distal end of the radius was treated with open reduction internal fixation.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dislocation; Elbow; Fracture; Injury; Trauma

Year:  2022        PMID: 36188087      PMCID: PMC9520508          DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.08.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Case Rep        ISSN: 1930-0433


Introduction

Fractures affecting only the distal radius are common forearm injuries accounting for 14% of all extremity injuries and 17% of all adult fractures treated in emergency departments [1,2]. The simultaneous ipsilateral occurrences of both proximal and distal radius injuries are rare and rarely reported [1], and the concurring presence of the ulna styloid fracture has been unreported in the literature. The management of a simultaneous ipsilateral fracture proximal and distal ends of the radius depends on the stability of the fracture, the degree of displacement, fracture pattern, physical demand of the individual patient, and age. Currently, there are no best practice guidelines for the treatment of such fractures.

Background

We're reporting a case of a 35-year-old Asian gentleman from the subcontinent, with no known background comorbidities, no known past surgical procedures, or any previous symptoms in the affected limb.

Presentation

This adult male presented to our Emergency Department following a slip and fall on an outstretched hand from a standing height. The right upper limb took the majority of the impact of the fall. After the incident, the patient complained of a painful right wrist with minimal ability to move the wrist. He also complained of pain in his right elbow and could move it but with moderate limitations due to the pain. Upon physical examination, the patient's right elbow and wrist were moderately swollen. No apparent external deformity was seen. He had tenderness over the volar aspect of the wrist and tenderness over the lateral condylar area of the elbow. His range of motion was limited due to pain, and his neurovascular examination was intact. Plain radiographs of the right wrist revealed an intra-articular distal radius comminute fracture and a fracture of the ulnar styloid process, as shown in Fig. 1. Right Elbow plain radiograph showed fractures involving right radial head and neck regions, predominantly along an anterolateral aspect, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3. CT scans images are shown in Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8.
Fig. 1

Communited distal radial intraarticular fracture with ulnar styloid process fracture.

Fig. 2

Radial head and a neck fracture of the ipsilateral elbow.

Fig. 3

Impacted proximal radial neck and head fracture and distal intraarticular fracture of the radius and ulnar styloid avulsion fracture.

Fig. 4

Displaced intra-articular distal radial fracture.

Fig. 5

Cross-section of CT showing communite distal radial intraarticular fracture with the ulnar styloid avulsion fracture.

Fig. 6

Lateral view of the radial intraarticular fracture.

Fig. 7

3D reconstructed CT wrist showing the fractures.

Fig. 8

3D reconstructed CT of the distal radius and ulna.

Communited distal radial intraarticular fracture with ulnar styloid process fracture. Radial head and a neck fracture of the ipsilateral elbow. Impacted proximal radial neck and head fracture and distal intraarticular fracture of the radius and ulnar styloid avulsion fracture. Displaced intra-articular distal radial fracture. Cross-section of CT showing communite distal radial intraarticular fracture with the ulnar styloid avulsion fracture. Lateral view of the radial intraarticular fracture. 3D reconstructed CT wrist showing the fractures. 3D reconstructed CT of the distal radius and ulna. Orthopedics on-call assessed the patient, and he was admitted for open reduction and internal fixation of the distal radius fracture through plate and screws (Fig. 9). The ulnar styloid and radial head fracture were treated conservatively.
Fig. 9

Plate and screws applied to the distal radius to stabilize the fracture.

Plate and screws applied to the distal radius to stabilize the fracture.

Discussion

Distal radial fractures are common injuries among adults and children. In adults, distal radius fractures account for 17% of all fractures managed in the emergency departments [1]. Another aspect of radius fracture is the fracture of the proximal head/neck of the radius. However, the occurrence of ipsilateral distal and proximal heads are highly uncommon, and only a few cases have been reported [1]. The exact mechanism resulting in proximal and distal radius fracture is challenging to speculate. The mechanisms depend on the position of the forearm during the time of impact and the joint and whether the elbow was flexed or extended. Posterior tension forces have an essential contribution to the injury if the elbow is flexed. In which case, compression forces across the radiocapitellar joint are created if abduction thrust is present [2]. On the other hand, having the elbow is locked in extension creates compression forces across the radiocapitellar joint, leading to injury. In addition to valgus and varus stresses, the forearm position is significant in determining fracture angulation. An increase in carrying angle may put the forearm in valgus stress and lead to proximal radius fracture and ulna, as noted by Henriksen [3]. Similarly, any varus strain might fracture the proximal radius or ulna [3]. The elbow sometimes experiences a temporary dislocation in these injuries [4]. The prognosis in the double injury is dictated by the trauma's energy and the skeletal maturity. It is speculated that the complexity of the forces required to cause the injury accounts for its rarity in the clinical practice. In the younger age group, these injury results from high-energy trauma with associated instability, comminution, and significant soft tissue injury. While in the older age group, the fracture complex could be due to low energy trauma with minimal displacement to the fracture and intact interosseous membrane, therefore, having a better prognosis. In the pediatric group, the fracture pattern is complicated by premature epiphyseal fusion and avascular necrosis of radial epiphysis [5]. Another similar injury pattern of double injuries is the Essex-Lopresti fracture and Monteggia fracture. There's a radial head fracture in Essex-Lopresti injury, with associated rupture of interosseous membrane and dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint resulting in forearm instability [6,7]. Unlike the Essex-Lopresti injury, in Monteggia, the fracture is in the ulna, not the radius, and there's a dislocation of the radial head; and according to Bado classification, there are 4 subtypes of Monteggia fracture. The most severe type is Monteggia fracture type IV, in which there's an anterior dislocation and fracture involving both the radius and the ulnar shaft [8]. Therefore, Patients with an increased carrying capacity present with a distal radial fracture should be subjected to a systemic elbow examination. Radiography of the elbow should be done in all cases of distal radius fracture in which there is suspicion of the presence of concomitant elbow trauma. The radial head articular surface should be preserved either by surgical or non-operative conservative methods to prevent proximal radial migration. Young people with these complex injuries are at risk of proximal migration of radius due to associated soft injury and inter-osseous membrane injury. There are no best practice guidelines for the treatment of ipsilateral proximal and distal fracture ends of radius. Il-Jung Park [10] study provided recommendations for treating a similar condition. Their study stated that the radial length should be taken into consideration. This is because of the risk of radial shortening in a proximal radial fracture which could be more severe when accompanied by distal radius fracture [9]. In our patient, an open reduction internal fixation was done to the right distal radius. Il-Jung Park [10] stated that fixation of the distal radius allows for the restoration of radial length and prevents instability or radiocapitellar overstuffing. The study recommended operation on the wrist first, followed by performing the radial head replacement. Consideration towards the elbow and the wrist should be taken in surgery and postoperative care as complications such as fracture collapse or metal failure may arise due to early rehabilitation. At the same time, prolonged immobilization may cause arthritic changes or joint contractures [10]. Patients may experience arthritic changes or joint contracture due to long periods of immobilization [11]. Hence, good clinical outcomes are possible with good reduction and anatomical alignment, maintaining or restoring normal intraarticular surface promoting bony union and healing, and guided effective rehabilitation methods. Patients should have a full explanation of the prognosis and outcome.

Patient consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.
  10 in total

1.  Monteggia fractures in pediatric and adult populations.

Authors:  Bryan G Beutel
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Simple elbow dislocation among adults: a comparative study of two different methods of treatment.

Authors:  Subramanyam Naidu Maripuri; Ujjwal Kanti Debnath; Prabhakar Rao; Khitish Mohanty
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Essex-lopresti injuries.

Authors:  Seth D Dodds; Peter C Yeh; Joseph F Slade
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Fractures of the radial head with distal radio-ulnar dislocation; report of two cases.

Authors:  P ESSEX-LOPRESTI
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1951-05

5.  Isolated fractures of the proximal end of the radius in children epidemiology, treatment and prognosis.

Authors:  B Henrikson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1969

6.  Displaced fractures of the neck of the radius in children.

Authors:  E R Jones; M Esah
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1971-08

7.  Displaced radial neck fractures in children.

Authors:  J H Newman
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Radial shortening following a fracture of the proximal radius.

Authors:  Andrew D Duckworth; Bruce S Watson; Elizabeth M Will; Brad A Petrisor; Phillip J Walmsley; Charles M Court-Brown; Margaret M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Simultaneous ipsilateral fractures of distal and proximal ends of the radius.

Authors:  Khalid Ibn El Kadi; Mounir Benabid; Sarr Saliou; Oussama El Assil; Amine Marzouki; Kamal Lahrach; Fawzi Boutayeb
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-06-08

10.  Simultaneous ipsilateral distal radius and radial head fractures: Two case reports of radius bipolar fracture.

Authors:  Il-Jung Park; Yoo Joon Sur; Jongmin Kim; Jin Hwa Jeon; Ho Youn Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.