Literature DB >> 3618802

Measurement of interstitial fluid pressure in dogs: evaluation of methods.

H Wiig, R K Reed, K Aukland.   

Abstract

Interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) was measured with two acute (micropipettes and wick-in-needle) and two chronic methods (perforated and porous capsules) in dog skin/subcutis. In control conditions all techniques gave similar mean pressures, approximately -2 mmHg. Overhydration induced by intravenous Ringer infusion, 10% of body wt, caused two to three times greater increase in pressure recorded with chronic than with acute methods but 2 h after the end of the infusion all methods gave similar pressures. An almost opposite pattern was observed during dehydration induced by peritoneal dialysis with hypertonic glucose. The fall in pressure recorded with the perforated capsule exceeded that of the porous capsule, both exceeding the pressure reduction measured with the acute methods by a factor of 2-5. The difference between pressures measured with both acute methods and the perforated capsule increased in the 90 min following dialysis. Acute overhydration or dehydration as well as aspiration from or infusion into perforated capsules caused a pressure gradient between lumen, capsule wall, and surrounding skin. We propose that the transient pressure differences recorded by acute vs. chronic methods during changes in hydration result from different physical properties of the capsule lining compared with that of the surrounding skin, in addition to a possible osmometer effect of the capsule lining.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3618802     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.2.H283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  6 in total

1.  On the edema-preventing effect of the calf muscle pump.

Authors:  C Stick; H Grau; E Witzleb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

2.  Effect of alpha-trinositol on interstitial fluid pressure, oedema generation and albumin extravasation in experimental frostbite in the rat.

Authors:  A Berg; P Aas; T Gustafsson; R K Reed
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  A simple method for measuring interstitial fluid pressure in cancer tissues.

Authors:  Ugur Ozerdem; Alan R Hargens
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 3.514

4.  Toward a noninvasive estimate of interstitial fluid pressure by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in a rat model of cerebral tumor.

Authors:  Rasha Elmghirbi; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Stephen L Brown; Kelly A Keenan; Swayamprava Panda; Glauber Cabral; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; George W Divine; Ian Y Lee; James R Ewing
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Lymphatic Vessel Network Structure and Physiology.

Authors:  Jerome W Breslin; Ying Yang; Joshua P Scallan; Richard S Sweat; Shaquria P Adderley; Walter L Murfee
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 9.090

6.  Computational Modeling of Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Velocity in Head and Neck Cancer Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Feasibility Analysis.

Authors:  Eve LoCastro; Ramesh Paudyal; Yousef Mazaheri; Vaios Hatzoglou; Jung Hun Oh; Yonggang Lu; Amaresha Shridhar Konar; Kira Vom Eigen; Alan Ho; James R Ewing; Nancy Lee; Joseph O Deasy; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.