| Literature DB >> 36188001 |
Lukasz Szydlowski1,2, Jiri Ehlich3, Pawel Szczerbiak2, Noriko Shibata1, Igor Goryanin1,4,5.
Abstract
In this study, electrogenic microbial communities originating from a single source were multiplied using our custom-made, 96-well-plate-based microbial fuel cell (MFC) array. Developed communities operated under different pH conditions and produced currents up to 19.4 A/m3 (0.6 A/m2) within 2 days of inoculation. Microscopic observations [combined scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)] revealed that some species present in the anodic biofilm adsorbed copper on their surface because of the bioleaching of the printed circuit board (PCB), yielding Cu2 + ions up to 600 mg/L. Beta- diversity indicates taxonomic divergence among all communities, but functional clustering is based on reactor pH. Annotated metagenomes showed the high presence of multicopper oxidases and Cu-resistance genes, as well as genes encoding aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading enzymes, corresponding to PCB bioleaching. Metagenome analysis revealed a high abundance of Dietzia spp., previously characterized in MFCs, which did not grow at pH 4. Binning metagenomes allowed us to identify novel species, one belonging to Actinotalea, not yet associated with electrogenicity and enriched only in the pH 7 anode. Furthermore, we identified 854 unique protein-coding genes in Actinotalea that lacked sequence homology with other metagenomes. The function of some genes was predicted with high accuracy through deep functional residue identification (DeepFRI), with several of these genes potentially related to electrogenic capacity. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using MFC arrays for the enrichment of functional electrogenic microbial consortia and data mining for the comparative analysis of either consortia or their members.Entities:
Keywords: bioleaching; copper; function prediction; metagenome; microbial fuel cell; printed circuit board (PCB)
Year: 2022 PMID: 36188001 PMCID: PMC9517587 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.951044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1(A) Overview. (B) Cross-section of the used array. (C) Experimental setup, with the wells marked red being the pH 4 group, wells marked blue being the pH 7 group and wells with rays being the open circuit potential (OCP) controls. (D) Daily maximal current densities measured post inoculation. (E) Cu concentrations measured from the effluent samples of each well. Statistical significance was tested using ONE-way ANOVA (*p-value < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping of anodic biofilms from the (A) pH 4 (B) and pH 7 electrodes.
FIGURE 3(A) Taxonomy analysis of the top 15 genera across all metagenomes. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on taxonomy (genus level) and functional features of the metagenomes using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity on a relative abundance matrix.
Gene count and abundance for the three pathways in all metagenomes.
| Genes | pH4 A | pH4 OCP | pH4 C | pH7 A | pH7 OCP | pH7 C |
| Cu-related | 65 | 68 | 7 | 74 | 74 | 52 |
|
| 1.35% | 1.22% | 0.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 0.99% |
| Electron transfer | 10 | 11 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 11 |
|
| 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.21% |
| Hydrocarbon degradation | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
|
| 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.12% | 0.08% |
FIGURE 4(A) Phylogenetic tree of bins from the pH7 anodes (numbers indicate substitutions per site). (B) Venn diagram showing common annotations. (C) The number of Bin.4-unique genes in different metabolic pathways. (D) The number of Bin.4-unique genes across EC classes for two deepest levels of EC classifications (dddd and ddd- respectively).
FIGURE 5Alphafold (left) and trRosetta models (middle) of our putative reductase gene (EC 7.2.1.-). Each structure is shown from two different perspectives (lower and upper panels). The TM-score between both structures (excluding disordered tails) is depicted in blue. For both the AlphaFold and trRosetta predictions, the model quality measures are shown (see Yang et al., 2020; Jumper et al., 2021 for details). On the right panel, the DeepFRI activation map across residues is shown.