| Literature DB >> 36187969 |
Yajun Wang1, Lan Ma2, Ziyang Liu2, Jingwei Chen2, Hongxian Song1, Jiajia Wang1, Hanwen Cui2, Zi Yang1, Sa Xiao2, Kun Liu2, Lizhe An1, Shuyan Chen1.
Abstract
Plant species and microbial interactions have significant impacts on the diversity of bacterial communities. However, few studies have explored interactions among these factors, such the role of microbial interactions in regulating the effects of plant species on soil bacterial diversity. We assumed that plant species not only affect bacterial community diversity directly, but also influence bacterial community diversity indirectly through changing microbial interactions. Specifically, we collected soil samples associated with three different plant species, one evergreen shrub (Rhododendron simsii) and the other two deciduous shrubs (Dasiphora fruticosa and Salix oritrepha). Soil bacterial community composition and diversity were examined by high-throughput sequencing. Moreover, soil bacterial antagonistic interactions and soil edaphic characteristics were evaluated. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) to disentangle and compare the direct effect of different plant species on soil bacterial community diversity, and their indirect effects through influence on soil edaphic characteristics and microbial antagonistic interactions. The results showed that (1) Plant species effects on soil bacterial diversity were significant; (2) Plant species effects on soil microbial antagonistic interactions were significant; and (3) there was not only a significant direct plant species effect on bacterial diversity, but also a significant indirect effect on bacterial diversity through influence on microbial antagonistic interactions. Our study reveals the difference among plant species in their effects on soil microbial antagonistic interactions and highlights the vital role of microbial interactions on shaping soil microbial community diversity.Entities:
Keywords: antagonism; bacterial diversity; microbial interactions; plant species; structural equation model
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187969 PMCID: PMC9521175 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.984200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1Overview of effects of shrub species on soil bacterial Shannon diversity (mean ± standard error). (A) Bacterial richness. (B) Bacterial Shannon diversity. Symbol: > 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA). The same letter means no significant difference (P > 0.1).
FIGURE 2Overview of effects of shrub species on soil edaphic properties. (A) Soil water content, (B) ammonium, (C) nitrate, (D) total nitrogen, (E) total phosphorus, (F) soil organic carbon, (G) soil pH, and (H) soil carbon-nitrogen ratio. Symbol: ∗P < 0.05; > 0.1 (one-way ANOVA). The same letter means no significant difference (P > 0.1).
FIGURE 3Overview of the effects of shrub species on soil Streptomyces antagonism potential (mean ± SE), Effects of plant species on (A) the soil total cultivable Streptomyces density, (B) the soil cultivable antagonistic Streptomyces density, (C) the diameter of the inhibition zone, (D) the proportion of inhibitory Streptomyces. Symbol: ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; > 0.1 (one-way ANOVA). The same letter means no significant difference (P > 0.1).
FIGURE 4Results of the SEM analyses indicating direct and indirect effects of shrub species on soil bacterial diversity [P (Chi-square) = 0.84, df = 3, RMSEA = 0]. Square boxes displayed variables included in the model: effect of D. fruticosa compared to R. simsii, effect of S. oritrepha compared to R. simsii, total nitrogen, water content, microbial antagonism potential (PC1 scores of total Streptomyces density, antagonistic Streptomyces density, intensity of inhibition, and frequency of inhibition), and bacterial diversity. Black arrows indicated significant effects (at the level P < 0.05), and gray arrows indicated marginally significant effects (at the level P < 0.1). Solid arrows indicated positive effects, while dashed arrows indicated negative effects. R2 values associated with response variables indicated the proportion of explained variation by relationships with other variables. Values associated with solid arrows represented standardized path coefficients. Symbol: ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗P < 0.05.