Literature DB >> 36187896

Autophagy in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Di Chen1, Hong Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) orchestrates host factors to remodel endomembrane compartments for various steps of the infection cycle. SARS-CoV-2 also intimately intersects with the catabolic autophagy pathway during infection. In response to virus infection, autophagy acts as an innate defensive system by delivering viral components/particles to lysosomes for degradation. Autophagy also elicits antiviral immune responses. SARS-CoV-2, like other positive-stranded RNA viruses, has evolved various mechanisms to escape autophagic destruction and to hijack the autophagic machinery for its own benefit. In this review, we will focus on how the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins and autophagy promotes viral replication and transmission. We will also discuss the pathogenic effects of SARS-CoV-2-elicited autophagy dysregulation and pharmacological interventions targeting autophagy for COVID-19 treatment.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36187896      PMCID: PMC9514017          DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2022.100596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol        ISSN: 2468-8673


Current Opinion in Physiology 2022, 0:xx–yy This review comes from a themed issue on VSI: Autophagy (2022) Edited by https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2022.100596 2468-8673/© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Introduction

As a catabolic process essential for cellular homeostasis maintenance, autophagy sequestrates a portion of the cytosolic constituents and delivers them to lysosomes for degradation [1]. In response to different stresses such as nutrient deprivation, oxidative effects, organelle damage and pathogen invasion, cargos are either non-selectively or selectively engulfed by double-membraned autophagosomes, which eventually fuse with lysosomes to become degradative autolysosomes to digest and recycle sequestrated materials 1, 2, 3. Autophagy requires the concerted actions of specific autophagy proteins and factors involved in endocytic trafficking. Upon autophagy induction in mammalian cells, the FIP200-ATG13-ULK1 Atg1 complex is firstly assembled on the ER, followed by targeting of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate kinase (PtdIns3-kinase) complex I (VPS34-VPS15-BECN1/Beclin1-ATG14) to generate phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns3P)-enriched ER subdomains, called omegasomes [4]. Omegasomes recruit downstream autophagy proteins for nucleation and initiation of isolation membranes (IMs). IMs are labeled by ubiquitin-like Atg8/LC3 family proteins that are conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), a process catalyzed by the E1-like enzyme ATG7, the E2-like enzyme ATG3 and the E3-like enzyme ATG12-ATG5 [5]. IMs expand and close to form double-membrane autophagosomes, which then mature by fusing with early endosomes, late endosomes and lysosomes to become single-membraned amphisomes. These eventually form degradative autolysosomes [1]. Fusion of autophagosomes/amphisomes with late endosomes/lysosomes requires Rab7, tethering factors such as the homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) complex and EPG5, and the STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 SNARE complex [1]. Maturation is also facilitated by autophagosome-localized PtdIns3P generated by the class III PI3K complex II (VPS34–VPS15-BECN1–UVRAG) [6]. Autophagic cargos are degraded by lysosomal hydrolases and then recycled 6, 7. Coronaviruses are a group of spherical, enveloped viruses with a ~30 kb, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome [8]. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of the global COVID-19 pandemic, belongs to the betacoronavirus genus along with mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) 8, 9. The genomic RNA of SARS-CoV-2 encodes four viral structural proteins, spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N), and also 16 non-structural proteins (NSP 1-16) and at least 9 accessory proteins (ORF proteins) 10, 11. Coronavirus replication and release involve extensive endomembrane remodeling, trafficking and fusion [12]. After engaging with the cell surface-localized receptor (e.g. ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2), coronaviruses enter host cells through endocytosis-mediated internalization or direct fusion with the plasma membrane (PM) ( Fig. 1) 13, 14. ER-derived double-membrane vesicles (DMVs) serve as replication organelles (ROs) for coronaviral RNA synthesis (Fig. 1) 15, ∙∙16. The virions are assembled at the ERGIC or single-membrane vesicles (SMVs) and released through the secretory pathway and/or the lysosome exocytic pathway 17, ∙∙18, 19. In virus-infected cells, autophagy provides an innate defensive mechanism by selectively degrading virions or viral proteins/genomes, and by activating the immune system for virus clearance 20, 21. On the other hand, viruses hijack the autophagic machinery to facilitate critical processes such as replication and egress 22, 23. In this review, we will briefly summarize the “proviral” and “antiviral” roles of autophagy in positive-stranded RNA virus infection, then we will focus on the latest progress in understanding the intersection of SARS-CoV-2 and autophagy for remodeling of endomembrane compartments for viral replication and egress. Potential therapeutic interventions targeting autophagy in SARS-CoV-2 infection will also be discussed.
Fig. 1

The interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and autophagy, SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells through direct fusion with the cell membrane or endocytosis. Surface-localized transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) or late-endosomal/lysosomal cathepsin B (CTSB)/ cathepsin L (CTSL) recognizes and cleaves a specific site on the S2 subunit of S protein (S2 cleavage), which leads to membrane fusion and viral genome release. ER-derived DMVs serve as replication organelles to provide viral RNA replication platforms. The molecular pore embedded in DMVs exports nascent viral RNA for translation or assembly. Virions are assembled at the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) or single-membrane vesicles (SMVs, not shown) and released through lysosomal exocytosis. A series of autophagy proteins are essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including VPS34 complexes, VMP1, TMEM41B, LC3, TMEM106B, RAB7 and VPS39. After translation and processing, SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins manipulate multiple steps of the autophagy pathway to benefit viral replication and egress. NSP6, ORF8 and NSP13 promote, while NSP15 inhibits, autophagy initiation/autophagosome formation; NSP6 and E inhibit autophagosome maturation; ORF7a, ORF3a, NSP6 and M inhibit formation of autolysosomes. Specifically, ORF8 mediates autophagic degradation of MHC-I, and NSP13 mediates autophagic degradation of TBK1. ORF3a inhibits the fusion between amphisomes/autophagosomes and lysosomes through sequestration of the HOPS component VPS39. ORF3a, ORF7a and NSP6 lead to lysosome deacidification. ORF3a also promotes lysosomal exocytosis-mediated viral egress. Proteins encoded by autophagy genes that are required for SARS-CoV-2 infection are listed in black. SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins involved in autophagy inhibition and autophagy induction are in red and green, respectively. PM, plasma membrane; LC3-I, unlipidated LC3; LC3-II, lipidated LC3.

The interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and autophagy, SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells through direct fusion with the cell membrane or endocytosis. Surface-localized transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) or late-endosomal/lysosomal cathepsin B (CTSB)/ cathepsin L (CTSL) recognizes and cleaves a specific site on the S2 subunit of S protein (S2 cleavage), which leads to membrane fusion and viral genome release. ER-derived DMVs serve as replication organelles to provide viral RNA replication platforms. The molecular pore embedded in DMVs exports nascent viral RNA for translation or assembly. Virions are assembled at the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) or single-membrane vesicles (SMVs, not shown) and released through lysosomal exocytosis. A series of autophagy proteins are essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including VPS34 complexes, VMP1, TMEM41B, LC3, TMEM106B, RAB7 and VPS39. After translation and processing, SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins manipulate multiple steps of the autophagy pathway to benefit viral replication and egress. NSP6, ORF8 and NSP13 promote, while NSP15 inhibits, autophagy initiation/autophagosome formation; NSP6 and E inhibit autophagosome maturation; ORF7a, ORF3a, NSP6 and M inhibit formation of autolysosomes. Specifically, ORF8 mediates autophagic degradation of MHC-I, and NSP13 mediates autophagic degradation of TBK1. ORF3a inhibits the fusion between amphisomes/autophagosomes and lysosomes through sequestration of the HOPS component VPS39. ORF3a, ORF7a and NSP6 lead to lysosome deacidification. ORF3a also promotes lysosomal exocytosis-mediated viral egress. Proteins encoded by autophagy genes that are required for SARS-CoV-2 infection are listed in black. SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins involved in autophagy inhibition and autophagy induction are in red and green, respectively. PM, plasma membrane; LC3-I, unlipidated LC3; LC3-II, lipidated LC3.

Dual functions of autophagy during positive-stranded RNA virus infection

Positive-stranded RNA virus infection can induce autophagy via multiple mechanisms. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) such as TLR3, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR10 sense viral constituents and induce autophagy 24, 25. TLR signaling triggers the recruitment of BECN1 and TRAF6 through the TLR downstream adaptor MyD88/TRIF to activate autophagosome biogenesis [24]. Viral proteins and/or genomes can also activate autophagy by eliciting cellular stresses such as ER stress and oxidative stress 26, 27. Autophagy defends cells against viral infection by delivering viruses/viral proteins to lysosomes for degradation 3, 21. Autophagy also activates innate and adaptive immune responses. For example, during virus infection, autophagy contributes to major histocompatibility complex class Ι and II (MHC-I and MHC-II) antigen presentation by facilitating viral antigen processing and transport 28, 29. Autophagy also regulates cytokine production, inflammation and cell survival to defend against virus invasion 20, 30, 31, 32. Positive-stranded RNA viruses have evolved diverse mechanisms to subvert autophagosomes and/or amphisomes for replication and extracellular release. Some viruses such as Dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus (ZIKV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) exploit DMVs with hallmarks of autophagosomes as replication organelles to anchor viral RNA replication complexes [23]. Poliovirus and enteroviruses also use non-lytic secretory autophagy for egress [23]. The autophagosomes formed in cells infected with positive-stranded RNA viruses are able to fuse with late endosomes, but cannot further fuse with lysosomes 33, 34, 35, 36, 37. Inhibiting the assembly of STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 complexes appears to be a mechanism widely employed by viruses to block autolysosome formation. For example, the viral proteinase 3C of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) and enterovirus 68 (EV-D68) mediates cleavage of SNAP29 to inhibit autophagosome-lysosome fusion 33, 36. Coronavirus infection also promotes autophagosome formation but blocks fusion of autophagosomes/amphisomes with lysosomes 38, ∙∙39, ∙40, ∙41. Coronaviruses induce the formation of ER-derived DMVs to provide platforms for genome replication and to protect viral RNAs from degradation and immune defenses (Fig. 1) [42]. Despite the morphological similarities between DMVs and autophagosomes, the intact autophagic machinery is not required for DMV formation and viral replication in coronavirus-infected cells. LC3, an Atg8 family member, is enriched in viral RNA-containing DMVs during MHV infection [43∙]. However, the PE-conjugated form of LC3, which labels autophagic structures, fails to label DMVs. The DMVs in MHV-infected cells are labeled with the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) components EDEM1 and OS-9, indicating that the machinery mediating the formation of the unlipidated LC3-coated EDEMosomes, which deliver the short-lived ERAD regulators to endosomes/lysosomes, are involved in forming DMVs [43∙]. LC3 participates in DMV formation or genome replication of MHV and SARS-CoV ∙43, 44. Depleting LC3 inhibits DMV formation as well as MHV infection [43∙]. Consistent with the idea that conjugation of LC3 with PE is not involved in DMV formation, the autophagic genes required for LC3-PE conjugation, such as ATG7, ATG5 and ATG16L, are dispensable for coronavirus infection. The replication of MHV is not affected in Atg7 knockout (KO) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [43∙], and Atg5-deleted bone marrow-derived macrophages or MEFs [45]. Depletion of ATG5 or ATG16L also has no effect on SARS-CoV-2 infection in Huh7-Lunet/T7 cells and in Vero E6 cells ∙41, 46. Knockout of Atg5 in MEF cells expressing human ACE2 (MEF-hACE2) has no effect on SARS-CoV infection [47]. SARS-CoV-2 replication was, however, reported to be slightly decreased in Atg5 KO MEF-hACE2 cells but dramatically blocked by Atg3 depletion [48]. In addition to autophagy, the LC3/Atg8 conjugation system acts in multiple vesicle trafficking and secretion processes [49]. The differential involvement of the LC3/Atg8 conjugation system in autophagy-independent processes under different experimental settings may account for the discrepancies. Therefore, the autophagic structures play distinct roles during the infection of different positive-stranded RNA viruses.

SARS-CoV-2 hijacks the autophagic machinery for endomembrane remodeling

Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screens and proteomics have identified a subset of genes involved in autophagy as essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, ∙∙55. The ER-localized transmembrane autophagy proteins VMP1 and TMEM41B are required for autophagosome formation (Fig. 1) ∙∙55, 56. During autophagosome biogenesis, VMP1 regulates the establishment and disassociation of ER-IM contacts, while TMEM41B interacts with VMP1 56, 57. Depletion of VMP1 or TMEM41B significantly inhibits infection by SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses at post-entry steps 52, 53, 54, 58. TMEM41B contributes to viral replication complex formation by mobilizing ER lipids for endomembrane remodeling 59, 60. Autophagy genes involved in PtdIns3P synthesis were also identified in the screens 50, 51. Depletion of the PtdIns3-kinase complex I and complex II components VPS34/PIK3C3, ATG14, BECN1 and UVRAG dramatically prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection ∙41, 51, ∙∙55. Treatment with VPS34 inhibitors, including 3-methyladenine (3-MA), Wortmannin and SAR405, effectively inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in multiple cell lines, lung tissues from hACE2 transgenic mice, and xenografted human lung tissues 38, ∙41, 51. The expression level of the VPS34-VPS15-BECN1 complex is gradually increased along with SARS-CoV-2 infection up to 72 h post-infection (hpi), while the ATG14 expression level is temporarily increased [41∙]. Thus, a subset of genes essential for autophagosome formation is also involved in the endomembrane remodeling required for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lysosome function is essential for degrading autophagic cargoes and also for lysosomal regeneration from autolysosomes 1, 61. RAB7 is a late-endosome/lysosome-localized small GTPase essential for endosomal maturation, lysosome function and autophagy [62]. Depleting RAB7 or inhibiting RAB7 activity inhibits SARS-CoV-2 and MHV infection ∙∙18, ∙∙55. TMEM106B is a lysosomal membrane protein involved in acidification, transportation and exocytosis of lysosomes [63]. TMEM106B depletion impairs autophagosome-lysosome fusion [64], leading to accumulation of autophagosomes as well as accelerating frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathologies in a progranulin (GRN)-deficient mouse model 65, 66. The coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 and MHV exploit the late endosome/lysosome exocytic pathway for egress (Fig. 1) [18∙∙]. SARS-CoV-2 or MHV virions are delivered into or assembled at RAB7/LAMP1-labeled single-membrane structures [18∙∙]. During lysosomal exocytosis, the BORC-ARL8b complex mediates the retrograde transport of late endosomes/lysosomes to the PM, and the STX4-SNAP23-VAMP7 SNARE complex mediates fusion with the PM [67]. SARS-CoV-2 infection facilitates recruitment of the SNARE complex and significantly elevates lysosomal exocytosis ∙∙18, ∙40. SARS-CoV-2 infection also causes lysosomal deacidification, which may contribute to the enhanced lysosomal exocytosis ∙∙18, ∙∙39. The nature of these LAMP1-labeled single-membrane structures in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells has yet to be determined. SARS-CoV-2-infected cells accumulate amphisome-like structures, in which viral particles are detected [39∙∙]. It is likely that SARS-CoV-2 induces promiscuous fusion of intracellular vesicles, resulting in formation of hybrid structures that mediate virus egress. Lysosomal exocytosis requires TRPML-mediated lysosomal Ca2+ release [67]. The TRPML inhibitor berbamine inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection [68]. In addition to the large, single-membrane vesicles that contain multiple viral particles, numerous small vesicles that usually contain a single viral particle are also observed at 10 hpi in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells [69]. These small vesicles also traffic to and fuse with the PM [69]. Thus, multiple pathways may be employed for viral release.

SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins manipulate the autophagy pathway

The SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins modulate autophagy at multiple steps to benefit virus production ( Table 1). SARS-CoV-2 infection effectively blocks autolysosome formation and concurrently causes accumulation of numerous autophagosomes/amphisomes ∙∙39, 70. Mechanistically, late endosome/lysosome-localized ORF3a of SARS-CoV-2 interacts with and sequestrates the HOPS component VPS39 to prevent the assembly of STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 SNARE complexes which are required for fusion between autophagosomes/amphisomes and lysosomes ∙∙39, 70. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a also leads to deacidification of lysosomes and significantly elevates lysosomal exocytosis (Table 1) ∙∙18, ∙∙39. SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a promotes SARS-CoV-2 infection and MHV egress ∙40, 48. Interestingly, SARS-CoV ORF3a, which displays 72.4% amino acid identity with SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a, fails to inhibit autophagy or promote lysosomal exocytosis ∙∙39, ∙40. Ser171 and Trp193 in SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a are essential for sequestrating VPS39, promoting lysosomal exocytosis and blocking autophagy [40∙]. Mutating the corresponding residues (i.e. E171S and R193W) endows SARS-CoV ORF3a with these functions [40∙]. SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a, but not SARS-CoV ORF3a, interacts with UVRAG, whose sequestration inhibits PtdIns3-kinase complex II assembly for autophagosome maturation [48]. Compared to SARS-CoV, the presence of a Furin cleavage site (PRRAR) in the S protein and also the ability of ORF3a to enhance lysosomal exocytosis endows SARS-CoV-2 with more efficient virus entry and release, contributing to its increased infectivity and pathogenicity ∙40, 71.
Table 1

The role of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins in the autophagy pathway.

NSP6

Inhibits cis-Golgi- and endosome-derived HyPAS formation and autophagosome biogenesis.

72, 73, ∙74, 75

Inhibits lysosomal acidification and acidic autolysosome formation.

IBV/MHV/SARS-CoV NSP6 promotes autophagosome formation but inhibits autophagosome maturation.

ORF3a

Inhibits acidic autolysosome formation through sequestration of the HOPS component VPS39.

∙∙39, ∙40, 48

Inhibits PI3K complex II assembly through interaction with and sequestration of UVRAG.

Inhibits lysosomal acidification and promotion of lysosomal exocytosis.

ORF8

Promotes autophagic degradation of MHC-I.

[81∙]
NSP13

Promotes autophagic degradation of TBK1.

[82]
ORF7a

Inhibits lysosomal acidification and acidic autolysosome formation.

[78]
NSP15

Inhibits autophagy initiation.

[78]
M

Inhibits autolysosome formation.

∙∙39, 78
E

Inhibits autophagosome maturation and autolysosome formation.

[78]
The role of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins in the autophagy pathway. Inhibits cis-Golgi- and endosome-derived HyPAS formation and autophagosome biogenesis. Inhibits lysosomal acidification and acidic autolysosome formation. IBV/MHV/SARS-CoV NSP6 promotes autophagosome formation but inhibits autophagosome maturation. Inhibits acidic autolysosome formation through sequestration of the HOPS component VPS39. Inhibits PI3K complex II assembly through interaction with and sequestration of UVRAG. Inhibits lysosomal acidification and promotion of lysosomal exocytosis. Promotes autophagic degradation of MHC-I. Promotes autophagic degradation of TBK1. Inhibits lysosomal acidification and acidic autolysosome formation. Inhibits autophagy initiation. Inhibits autolysosome formation. Inhibits autophagosome maturation and autolysosome formation. Autophagosomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells are smaller than those in starved cells [39∙∙]. Resembling SARS-CoV-2 infection, expression of NSP6 from Infectious Bronchitis virus (IBV), MHV, and SARS-CoV inhibits autophagic flux and causes accumulation of smaller autophagosomes than the ones formed under starvation conditions ∙∙39, 72, 73, ∙74. NSP6 expression as well as IBV infection induces the formation but restricts the expansion of autophagosomes 73, ∙74. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 inhibits the formation of hybrid pre-autophagosomal structures (HyPAS), which are derived from cis-Golgi and endosomal membranes essential for autophagosome biogenesis [75]. NSP6 expression, similar to SARS-CoV-2 infection, induces inflammatory cell death, known as pyroptosis, which is associated with blocked autophagy and lysosomal deacidification [72]. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 also inactivates a lysosomal ATPase proton pump component, ATP6AP1, to impair lysosomal acidification, and thus block autophagosome maturation (Table 1) [72]. It will be interesting to determine whether the NSP6 mutations found in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant affect its role in autophagy 76, 77. ORF7a, E, M and NSP15 of SARS-CoV-2 have also been shown to impair autophagy (Table 1). ORF7a prevents autophagic degradation by reducing lysosomal acidification, while NSP15 inhibits autophagy initiation [78]. Expression of M also inhibits the formation of acidified autolysosomes ∙∙39, 78. Lysosomal neutralization has been shown to promote their exocytosis 79, 80. Therefore, multiple SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins cause lysosomal deacidification to block autophagy while facilitating exocytosis for viral release. SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins also promote autophagic degradation of host factors essential for immune responses. SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 promotes autophagic degradation of MHC-I to downregulate viral antigen presentation [81∙]. NSP13 recruits TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) to p62 and promotes its autophagic degradation, thereby inhibiting type I interferon (IFN-I) production [82]. Depletion of BECN1 restores MHC-I expression in ORF8-expressing cells and IFN-β production in NSP13-expressing cells ∙81, 82. Therefore, autophagy activity may be temporally modulated during SARS-CoV-2 infection. At the early stage of infection, selective autophagy is activated to remove host factors, thus allowing the virus to escape immune surveillance. At late stages, viral proteins, which have been abundantly translated, inhibit autophagy by reducing the autophagosome size (e.g. NSP6) and blocking formation of degradative autolysosomes (e.g. ORF3a, NSP6 and ORF7a). Formation of deacidified lysosomes/hybrid structures promotes exocytosis-mediated viral egress.

The pathogenic effects of SARS-CoV-2-induced autophagy dysregulation and potential interventions targeting autophagy

SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits cytokine storm syndrome, an important contributor to severe COVID-19 cases [83]. Autophagy stagnation also triggers massive proinflammatory cytokine production [84]. Depletion of core autophagy genes such as BECN1 and ATG7, or treatment with autophagy inhibitors, dramatically promotes cytokine secretion 84, 85. The abnormal cytokine response upon SARS-CoV-2 infection probably involves autophagy dysregulation. Autophagy is required for recovery from neuroinflammation [86]. COVID-19 patients show meningoencephalitis with ectopic cytokine production in the cerebrospinal fluid 87, 88. Dysfunctional autophagy may be responsible for the vulnerability of neuronal cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therapeutic approaches targeting autophagy have been shown to prevent SARS-CoV-2 replication and egress, and also have the potential to alleviate the exaggerated inflammation caused by cytokine storms in COVID-19 patients. Using computational approaches, anti-SARS-CoV-2 compounds were designed and verified by cell culture virus infection assays [89]. Remarkably, most of these compounds are viral entry inhibitors and/or autophagy modulators [89], which suggests that autophagy modulators can play antiviral roles at post-entry steps. Many pharmacological autophagy modulators have also been identified as potential therapies for COVID-19. Some of them are FDA-approved drugs while others are undergoing clinical trials. Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which are well-known inhibitors of autolysosome formation, effectively prevent infection by HIV, HCV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 [90]. By increasing the pH of intracellular acidic organelles, CQ and HCQ affect multiple steps in the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle and exhibit contrasting antiviral activities in different cell lines, which could be due to their differential functions in viral entry and release 90, 91. Various VPS34 inhibitors, which inhibit autophagy initiation, prevent SARS-CoV-2 replication and show promise for COVID-19 treatment [47]. Autophagy activators, such as Vitamin D3, mitigate uncontrolled inflammatory responses and have potential for combination drug therapy [85]. As the existing antiviral drugs targeting the autophagy pathway often have non-specific effects, such as lysosomal dysfunction induced by CQ/HCQ treatment, caution is needed in their clinical application.

Conclusions and perspectives

During SARS-CoV-2 infection, the endomembrane system is extensively remodeled to generate DMVs for viral replication and multiple non-degradative lysosomes for viral egress. Autophagy also intersects with the endomembrane compartment at multiple sites. Not surprisingly, there is intricate interplay between SARS-CoV-2 infection and autophagy. SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins enhance autophagic degradation of pivotal immune proteins, enabling the virus to escape surveillance. Viral proteins also interfere with lysosomal acidification and function, thus impairing the fusion of autophagic vesicles with lysosomes in order to hijack the end-stage autophagic structures for viral egress. Future studies must investigate how autophagy activity is differentially modulated at different stages of viral infection and how autophagy induction and autophagosome maturation are coordinately controlled by viral proteins. The mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins interact with ER-associated autophagy proteins (such as VMP1, TMEM41B and the VPS34 complex) for DMV generation also requires investigation. Given the important role of autophagy in cytokine production and inflammation, it will be important to determine the impact of autophagy on the abnormally elevated cytokine levels in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Elucidating the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins and the autophagic machinery helps us to develop new intervention strategies. The main focus for COVID-19 treatment has been blocking SARS-CoV-2 entry, such as by inhibiting ACE2 binding and inactivating cell surface-localized proteases which cleave S proteins. The emergence of the Omicron variant shows that the receptor and spike proteins can mutate to enhance viral entry while evading neutralizing antibodies. The Omicron variant enters host cells largely via endocytosis rather than by TMPRSS2-mediated membrane fusion due to mutations in the spike protein [92]. Just two different amino acids are responsible for the differential function of SARS-CoV-2 ORF3a and SARS-CoV ORF3a in autophagosome maturation and lysosomal exocytosis. It will be interesting to investigate whether mutations in different SARS-CoV-2 variants also modulate the autophagy pathway and its effect on viral infectivity. The autophagic machinery is generally hijacked to facilitate DMV generation and lysosomal egress, which are essential for coronavirus infection. Therefore, therapeutic approaches to precisely manipulate autophagy at different stages of virus infection are promising for combating COVID-19 and yet-to-emerge coronaviruses.
  90 in total

1.  TMEM41B functions with VMP1 in autophagosome formation.

Authors:  Keigo Morita; Yutaro Hama; Noboru Mizushima
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 2.  Autophagy in regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling.

Authors:  Takeshi Into; Megumi Inomata; Eiji Takayama; Toshiya Takigawa
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.315

3.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication is severely impaired by MG132 due to proteasome-independent inhibition of M-calpain.

Authors:  Martha Schneider; Kerstin Ackermann; Melissa Stuart; Claudia Wex; Ulrike Protzer; Hermann M Schätzl; Sabine Gilch
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Regulation of the innate immune system by autophagy: monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells and antigen presentation.

Authors:  Nina Germic; Ziva Frangez; Shida Yousefi; Hans-Uwe Simon
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 15.828

5.  Subversion of cellular autophagosomal machinery by RNA viruses.

Authors:  William T Jackson; Thomas H Giddings; Matthew P Taylor; Sara Mulinyawe; Marlene Rabinovitch; Ron R Kopito; Karla Kirkegaard
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells.

Authors:  Markus Hoffmann; Hannah Kleine-Weber; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Systematic functional analysis of SARS-CoV-2 proteins uncovers viral innate immune antagonists and remaining vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Manuel Hayn; Maximilian Hirschenberger; Lennart Koepke; Rayhane Nchioua; Jan Hendrik Straub; Susanne Klute; Victoria Hunszinger; Fabian Zech; Caterina Prelli Bozzo; Wasim Aftab; Maria Hønholt Christensen; Carina Conzelmann; Janis Alexander Müller; Smitha Srinivasachar Badarinarayan; Christina Martina Stürzel; Ignasi Forne; Steffen Stenger; Karl-Klaus Conzelmann; Jan Münch; Florian Ingo Schmidt; Daniel Sauter; Axel Imhof; Frank Kirchhoff; Konstantin Maria Johannes Sparrer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  TMEM41B is a host factor required for the replication of diverse coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Joseph D Trimarco; Brook E Heaton; Ryan R Chaparian; Kaitlyn N Burke; Raquel A Binder; Gregory C Gray; Clare M Smith; Vineet D Menachery; Nicholas S Heaton
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  β-Coronaviruses Use Lysosomes for Egress Instead of the Biosynthetic Secretory Pathway.

Authors:  Sourish Ghosh; Teegan A Dellibovi-Ragheb; Adeline Kerviel; Eowyn Pak; Qi Qiu; Matthew Fisher; Peter M Takvorian; Christopher Bleck; Victor W Hsu; Anthony R Fehr; Stanley Perlman; Sooraj R Achar; Marco R Straus; Gary R Whittaker; Cornelis A M de Haan; John Kehrl; Grégoire Altan-Bonnet; Nihal Altan-Bonnet
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Genome-scale CRISPR screen identifies TMEM41B as a multi-function host factor required for coronavirus replication.

Authors:  Limeng Sun; Changzhi Zhao; Zhen Fu; Yanan Fu; Zhelin Su; Yangyang Li; Yuan Zhou; Yubei Tan; Jingjin Li; Yixin Xiang; Xiongwei Nie; Jinfu Zhang; Fei Liu; Shuhong Zhao; Shengsong Xie; Guiqing Peng
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.