Ahmet Hamdi Akgülle 1 , Mariam Haidar 1 , Doruk Kaan Baştürk 1 , Mert Gündoğdu 1 , Özge Kenis Coşkun 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Background: In-toeing is one of the main reasons children are applying to the orthopedics clinic. In the clinical settings, during in-toeing gait assessment parents often define that their child does not walk same at the clinic as at home, linked possibly to Hawthorne effect. Research Question: How does the in-toeing angle differ when children are aware, versus when they are not aware of their gait inspection? Methods: This single center, clinical, cross-sectional, observational study looked into the variation in gait pattern of twelve children with in-toeing, with and without their awareness. Two videos for each child was recorded with a smart phone, once at the clinic while aware and once by the family without awareness, and uploaded into Kinovea software for gait analysis. The angle of foot in-toeing was measured and analyzed using SPSS comparison of means and correlations. Results: The gait pattern evaluated with the angle of in-toeing showed a significant difference between the two videos of the same child. The angle difference returned a p value of 0.000 using paired sample t test and a Cohen's d value of 1.4, representing the large significance between clinic and family recorded videos. The initial foot in-toeing angle showed a moderate positive Pearson's correlation of 0.031 when compared with the angle difference in both settings. Significance: These results highlight the importance of including family recorded videos in gait pattern analysis without the patient's awareness. The study not only shows the significant difference found which can be explained by Hawthorne Effect but also suggests a clearer path of understanding the child's condition with the family. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Background: In-toeing is one of the main reasons children are applying to the orthopedics clinic. In the clinical settings, during in-toeing gait assessment parents often define that their child does not walk same at the clinic as at home, linked possibly to Hawthorne effect. Research Question: How does the in-toeing angle differ when children are aware, versus when they are not aware of their gait inspection? Methods: This single center, clinical, cross-sectional, observational study looked into the variation in gait pattern of twelve children with in-toeing, with and without their awareness. Two videos for each child was recorded with a smart phone, once at the clinic while aware and once by the family without awareness, and uploaded into Kinovea software for gait analysis. The angle of foot in-toeing was measured and analyzed using SPSS comparison of means and correlations. Results: The gait pattern evaluated with the angle of in-toeing showed a significant difference between the two videos of the same child. The angle difference returned a p value of 0.000 using paired sample t test and a Cohen's d value of 1.4, representing the large significance between clinic and family recorded videos. The initial foot in-toeing angle showed a moderate positive Pearson's correlation of 0.031 when compared with the angle difference in both settings. Significance: These results highlight the importance of including family recorded videos in gait pattern analysis without the patient's awareness. The study not only shows the significant difference found which can be explained by Hawthorne Effect but also suggests a clearer path of understanding the child's condition with the family. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Femoral anteversion; Gait analysis; Hawthorne Effect; In-toeing
Year: 2022
PMID： 36187586 PMCID： PMC9485350 DOI： 10.1007/s43465-022-00729-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN： 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.033