Literature DB >> 36187523

Impact of Chest Wall Perforator Flaps on Rates of Total Mastectomy in Breast Cancer.

Kirti Katherine Kabeer1, Manoj Gowda S1, Sadaf Jafferbhoy1, Sekhar Marla1, Sankaran Narayanan1,2, Soni Soumian1,2.   

Abstract

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) outcomes are comparable to mastectomy in breast cancer treatment. However, patients with large tumours were offered mastectomy due to the resulting poor cosmetic sequelae after standard BCS. With the introduction of chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF), BCS is an option in patients with large tumour:breast ratio. The objective of our study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of CWPFs and their impact on mastectomy rates. In order to assess the impact of CWPF on mastectomy rates, patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2019 were included in a cohort named group A. In group A, the type of surgery performed was collected for each year from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients who underwent BCS and CWPF from July 2016 to June 2021 were included in another cohort named group B. In group B, patient-related and disease-specific details including post-operative complications were collected and analysed. In group A, following the introduction of CWPF, the mastectomy rates dropped by 10.69% and the mastectomy with reconstruction rates dropped by 23.29%. In group B, a total of 152 patients underwent CWPF reconstructions. The median tumour size was 20 mm (range = 0-80). A majority of patients were discharged within 24-h hospital stay (98.2%). Seventeen patients (11.11%) had a re-operation for margin positivity. Sixteen patients (10.46%) developed early complications and 19 patients (12.42%) developed delayed complications. CWPFs expand indications for BCS thus reducing mastectomy rates. It also has less morbidity when compared to reported mastectomy and reconstruction rates, thus making it a safe option for suitable patients. © Crown 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast-conserving surgery; Chest wall perforator flap; Mastectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36187523      PMCID: PMC9515262          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01506-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  15 in total

1.  The lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  H Holmström; C Lossing
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

Authors:  Peer Christiansen; Stina Lyck Carstensen; Bent Ejlertsen; Niels Kroman; Birgitte Offersen; Anne Bodilsen; Maj-Britt Jensen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.

Authors:  Moustapha Hamdi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Early Postoperative Outcomes in Breast Conservation Surgery Versus Simple Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction: A NSQIP Analysis of 11,645 Patients.

Authors:  Bryan Pyfer; Abhishek Chatterjee; Lilian Chen; John Nigriny; Brian Czerniecki; Julia Tchou; Carla Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Funda Meric; Thomas A Buchholz; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Raphael E Pollock; S Eva Singletary; Barry W Feig; Henry M Kuerer; Lisa A Newman; George H Perkins; Eric A Strom; Marsha D McNeese; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept.

Authors:  Moustapha Hamdi; Koenraad Van Landuyt; Stan Monstrey; Phillip Blondeel
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2004-09

7.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark V Schaverien; Henry M Kuerer; Abigail S Caudle; Benjamin D Smith; Rosa F Hwang; Geoffrey L Robb
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Elizabeth J Conroy; Ramsey I Cutress; Paula R Williamson; Lisa Whisker; Steven Thrush; Joanna Skillman; Nicola L P Barnes; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Elisabeth Teasdale; Abhilash Jain; Matthew D Gardiner; Jane M Blazeby; Chris Holcombe
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  The usefulness of pedicled perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction after breast conserving surgery in Korean women.

Authors:  Jae Bong Kim; Dong Kyu Kim; Jeong Woo Lee; Kang Young Choi; Ho Yun Chung; Byung Chae Cho; Ho Yong Park; Jee Yeon Lee; Jung Dug Yang
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.