| Literature DB >> 36187446 |
Md Wali Ullah1,2, Naoki Haraguchi2, Md Azgar Ali2, Md Rabiul Alam1,2, Samiul Islam Chowdhury3.
Abstract
Well-defined functional poly(p-phenyl styrenesulfonate) and poly(p-phenyl styrene-sulfonate-co-styrene) were successfully synthesized by the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using CuBr/bpy(PMDETA) catalyst and 1-phenylethyl bromide (1-PEBr) as an ATRP initiator in diphenyl ether (DPE) or dimethyl formamide (DMF). In both homo- and copolymers, the CuBr/PMDETA catalytic system in DPE or DME showed higher yield than CuBr/bpy and the polydispersity index (PDI) of polymer was low. Using PMDETA or bpy as a ligand in DMF, the high yield with high PDI was obtained than in DPE. We found that the CuBr/PMDETA catalyzed ATRP of p-phenyl styrenesulfonate and copolymerization with styrene comonomer in DPE proceeded in a controlled manner. The polymers containing sulfonic acid were obtained by the chemical deprotection of protecting group, followed by acidification. The molecular structure, molecular weights and thermal properties of the copolymers were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, size exclusion chromatography (SEC), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Atom transfer radical polymerization; sulfonic acid functionality; well-defined homo- and copolymer
Year: 2022 PMID: 36187446 PMCID: PMC9518635 DOI: 10.1080/15685551.2022.2126092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Des Monomers Polym ISSN: 1385-772X Impact factor: 3.718
Scheme 1.Synthesis of PSS and CP-SS.
Characterization data for PSS and or CP-SS synthesized by ATRP.a.
| Entry | Polymer | Ligand | Solvent | Yield (%) | Molar ratio (S:SS)c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I* | PS | PMDETA | DPE | 81 | 4,400 | 4,470 | 4,240 | 1.27 | - |
| 1d | PSS | PMDETA | DPE | 67 | 8,910 | 12,900 | 8,780 | 1.31 | - |
| II* | PS | bpy | DPE | 54 | 3,000 | 3,070 | 2,980 | 1.06 | - |
| 2d | PSS | bpy | DPE | 50 | 6,690 | 12,500 | 13,200 | 1.44 | - |
| 3d | PSS | PMDETA | DMF | 74 | 9,810 | 13,700 | 11,400 | 1.42 | - |
| 4e | PSS | bpy | DMF | 58 | 7,730 | 12,800 | 13,500 | 1.45 | - |
| 5e | CP-SS | PMDETA | DPE | 45 | 8,390 | 15,600 | 9,230 | 1.53 | 70:30 |
| 6e | CP-SS | bpy | DPE | 26 | 4,920 | 5,570 | 3,790 | 1.10 | 50:30 |
| 7e | CP-SS | PMDETA | DMF | 51 | 9,470 | 17,100 | 10,350 | 1.79 | 60:30 |
| 8e | CP-SS | bpy | DMF | 37 | 6,920 | 17,500 | 12,500 | 2.26 | 50:30 |
[Monomer]o = 4.0 M, [1-PEBr]o = [CuBr]o = 0.08 M, and [bpy(PMDETA)]o = 0.24 M.
aPolymerizations were performed at 110 °C for 24 h. [M]o/[1-PEBr]o/[CuBr]o/[bpy(PMDETA)]o = 100/2/2/6.
Mn, th = [{(MW)M × Conversion × ([M]o/[1-PEBr]o)} + (MW)1-PEBr].
bDetermined by SEC using DMF as an eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL.min−1 at 40 °C (polystyrene standards).
cDetermined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
dSS was used as a monomer.
eS and SS were used as monomers.
* [59]
Figure 1.SEC traces of PSS.
Figure 2.1H NMR spectra of PS, PSS, and CP-SS in CDCl3.
Figure 3.FTIR spectra of PS, PSS, PSSNa, CP-SS, CP-SSNa, and CP-SSH.
Figure 4.SEC traces of CP-SS.
Figure 5.(a) TGA and (b) DSC thermograms of CP-SS and CP-SSH.