| Literature DB >> 36186898 |
Jiao Yu1, Xiaojiao Chen2, Shuhong Zhao1, Jingchen Jing1, Qing Wang1, Yunzhi Dang1.
Abstract
Background: Since metastasis is the primary cause of death in human colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, the exact mechanism underlying CRC metastasis remains unclear. Here, we provide evidence for a unique function of HomeoboxC10 (HOXC10) in driving CRC metastasis, as well as treatment options for these subpopulation patients.Entities:
Keywords: HOXC10; colorectal cancer; myeloid-derived suppressor cells.
Year: 2022 PMID: 36186898 PMCID: PMC9516010 DOI: 10.7150/jca.76945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.478
Figure 1Elevated HOXC10 positively correlates with poor prognosis in CRC. (A). Relative HOXC10 mRNA expression in 20 normal colon tissues and 100 paired CRC and adjacent nontumor tissues. (B). Relative HOXC10 mRNA expression in CRC tissues with recurrence or with no recurrence. (C). Relative HOXC10 mRNA expression in CRC tissues with metastasis or with no metastasis. (D). Representative images of IHC staining of HOXC10. (E). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation of HOXC10 expression with overall survival and recurrence in human CRC cohort.
Correlation between HOXC10 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in cohort of human CRC.
| Clinicopathological variables | Tumor HOXC10 expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (n=132) | Positive (n=90) | |||
| Age | ≤50 | 59 | 45 | 0.437 |
| >50 | 73 | 45 | ||
| Gender | female | 61 | 39 | 0.672 |
| male | 71 | 51 | ||
| Tumor size | ≤5cm | 62 | 35 | 0.233 |
| >5cm | 70 | 55 | ||
| Tumor differentiation | well or moderate | 104 | 52 | 0.001 |
| poor | 28 | 38 | ||
| Tumor invasion | T1-T3 | 111 | 65 | 0.032 |
| T4 | 21 | 25 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | absent | 94 | 30 | <0.001 |
| present | 38 | 60 | ||
| Distant metastasis | absent | 119 | 64 | <0.001 |
| present | 13 | 26 | ||
| AJCC stage | I-II | 95 | 27 | <0.001 |
| III-IV | 37 | 63 | ||
Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with survival and recurrence in cohort of human CRC
| Clinical Variables | Time to Recurrence | Overall Survival | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
|
| ||||
| Age (≤50vs > 50) | 1.068 (0.759-1.501) | 0.707 | 0.996 (0.980-1.013) | 0.646 |
| Gender (female vs male) | 0.921 (0.631-1.238) | 0.470 | 0.908 (0.645-1.276) | 0.577 |
| Tumor size (≤5 cm vs >5 cm) | 0.767 (0.542-1.086) | 0.130 | 0.735(0.519-1.041) | 0.083 |
| Tumor differentiation (well/moderate vs poor) | 0.171 (0.121-0.230) | <0.001 | 0.165 (0.109-0.236) | <0.001 |
| Tumor invasion (T1-3 vs T4) | 0.32 (0.21-0.432) | <0.001 | 0.290 (0.210-0.431) | <0.001 |
| Lymph node metastasis (absent vs present) | 0.098 (0.053-0.156) | <0.001 | 0.086 (0.074-0.149) | <0.001 |
| Distant metastasis (absent vs present) | 0.088 (0.063-0.143) | <0.001 | 0.121 (0.075-0.145) | <0.001 |
| AJCC stage (I-II vs III) | 0.096 (0.057-0.131) | <0.001 | 0.079(0.061-0.132) | <0.001 |
| HOXC10 expression (negative vs positive) | 0.291 (0.205-0.415) | <0.001 | 0.283 (0.199-0.403) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Tumor differentiation (well/moderate vs poor) | 0.800 (0.497-1.286) | 0.356 | 0.762 (0.474-1.225) | 0.262 |
| Tumor invasion (IT1-3 vs T4) | 0.739 (0.485-1.127) | 0.160 | 0.803 (0.527-1.222) | 0.306 |
| Lymph node metastasis (absent vs present) | 0.488 (0.155-1.533) | 0.219 | 0.515 (0.198-1.339) | 0.174 |
| Distant metastasis (absent vs present) | 0.357 (0.209-0.609) | <0.001 | 0.360 (0.215-0.603) | <0.001 |
| AJCC stage (I-II vs III) | 0.264 (0.080-0.837) | 0.029 | 0.237 (0.086-0.648) | 0.005 |
| HOXC10 expression (negative vs positive) | 0.561 (0.379-0.831) | 0.004 | 0.601(0.407-0.887) | 0.010 |
Figure 2HOXC10 overexpression promotes CRC metastasis in immunocompetent mice. (A-F). In vivo assays showed that HOXC10 overexpression can promote CRC metastasis. (A). Bioluminescent images. (B). Bioluminescent signals. (C). Overall survival. (D). The incidence of lung and liver colonization. (E). The number of lung and liver colonization. (F). HE staining was applied to exhibit metastatic lung and liver nodules. * P<0.05.
Figure 3HOXC10 promotes CRC metastasis by recruitment of MDSCs. (A). The infiltration of MDSCs and CD8 cells in the MC38-control and MC38-HOXC10 groups was analyzed by flow cytometry. (B). The infiltration of MDSCs and CD8 cells in two group was analyzed by IHC. (C). The correlation between HOXC10 expression and the expression of CD11b or CD8 in CRC cohort. (D). IHC staining showed HOXC10, CD11b and CD8 expression in CRC tissues.
Figure 4HOXC10 overexpression induces MDSCs chemotaxis by upregulating CXCL5 expression in CRC. (A). HOXC10 and CXCL5 expression in the indicated cell by Real-time PCR analysis. (B-F). CXCL5 knockdown can inhibit HOXC10-mediated CRC metastasis. Bioluminescence images (B). Bioluminescence signals (C). Overall survival (D). The number of lung and liver colonization(E). HE staining (F). (G). The infiltration of MDSCs and CD8 in two groups was analyzed by flow cytometry. All the data are shown as the mean±s.d. * P<0.05.
Figure 5Combined application of CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002 and anti-PD-L1 dramatically blocks HOXC10-mediated CRC metastasis. (A-E). One week after injection of MC38-HOXC10 cells, mice in four groups were treated with vehicle, PD-L1 antibody or/and SB225002 (n=10 mice/group) until treatment endpoint. In vivo assays showed that combined treatment of PD-L1 antibody and CXCR2 inhibitors SB225002 can almost inhibit CRC metastasis. (A). Representative bioluminescent images and bioluminescent signals in indicated group. (B). Overall survival in indicated group. (C). The number of lung and liver nodules in indicated group. (D). The incidence of lung and liver nodules in indicated group. (E). Representative HE staining of lung and liver tissues. (F). IHC staining detected the infiltration of MDSCs or CD8+ cells in indicated group. All the data are shown as the mean±s.d. * P<0.05.