| Literature DB >> 36186846 |
Deborah Mattinzoli1, Michele Cacioppo2,3, Masami Ikehata1, Silvia Armelloni1, Carlo Maria Alfieri4,5, Giuseppe Castellano4,5, Mario Barilani6,7, Francesca Arcudi2, Piergiorgio Messa4,5, Maurizio Prato2,3,8.
Abstract
Irinotecan (CTP-11) is one of the standard therapies for colorectal cancer (CRC). CTP-11 is enzymatically converted to the hydrophobic 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN38), a one hundred-fold more active metabolite. Conjugation of hydrophobic anticancer drugs to nanomaterials is a strategy to improve their solubility, efficacy, and selectivity. Carbon dots (CDs) have garnered interest for their small sizes (<10 nm), low toxicity, high water solubility, and bright fluorescence. This paper describes the use of CDs to improve drug vehiculation, stability, and chemotherapeutic efficiency of SN38 through a direct intracellular uptake in CRC. The covalent conjugation of SN38 to CDs via a carbamate bond provides a CD-SN38 hybrid material for slow, sustained, and pH-responsive drug release. CD-SN38 successfully penetrates the CRC cells with a release in the nucleus affecting first the cell cycle and then the cytoskeleton. Moreover, CD-SN38 leads to a deregulation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), one of the major components of the cancer niche considered a possible target therapy for reducing the cancer progression. This work shows the combined therapeutic and imaging potential of CD-based hybrid materials for the treatment of CRC. Future efforts for targeted therapy of chronic diseases characterized by altered ECM deposition, such as chronic kidney disease and chronic allograft nephropathy in kidney transplant patients are envisaged.Entities:
Keywords: CD-SN38, CNDs conjugate with SN38; CDK7, cyclin-dependent kinase 7; CNDs, carbon nanodots; COLIαI, collagen type I alpha 1 chain; CPT11, camptotecin 11; CRC, colorectal cancer; Carbon dots; Cell cycle; Colorectal cancer therapy; Drug delivery; ECM, Extracellular Matrix; Extracellular matrix; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FCS, fetal calf serum; HT29, CRC cell line; HciGEnC, conditionally immortalized human glomerular endothelial cells; HciPodo, conditionally immortalized human podocytes; IF, immunofluorescence; Ki-67, antigen Ki-67; LD50, 50% lethal dose; MTT, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide; PBS, phosphate buffer saline; RPL4, Ribosomal Protein L4; RT, room temperature; SD, standard deviation; SN38; SN38, 7-etil-10-idrossi-camptotecina; TGFβ1, transforming growth factor beta1; TME, Tumor Micro Environment; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; o.n., overnight
Year: 2022 PMID: 36186846 PMCID: PMC9523396 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Bio ISSN: 2590-0064
Fig. 1Synthetic scheme for the covalent hybrid CD-SN38 used in this study.
Fig. 2(a) FT-IR (KBr) and (b) 1H NMR (DMSO-d, 298 K, 500 MHz) spectra of CDs (top), CD-SN38 (middle), SN38 (bottom). (c) UV–Vis (black solid line), and FL (red dotted line for excitation at 334 nm, red solid line for excitation at 500 nm) spectra of CDs (top), CD-SN38 (middle) and SN38 (bottom) (DMF, 298 K). (d) Quantitative analysis of the SN38 release from CD-SN38 at 37 °C and incubated at pH 7.4 (black trace) or pH 5.3 (red trace); the curves indicate the fit to experimental data using a first-order release model.
Fig. 3(a) HT29 nucleus (blue) and actin filament (red) imaging after 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, 12 h, 24 h of incubation with 0.1 mg mL−1 of CDs (green) or 0.1 mg mL−1 of CD-SN38 (green). (b) HT29 nucleus (blue) and actin filament (red) imaging after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h of incubation with 0.1 mg mL−1 of CDs (green), 1 μM of SN38 and 0.1 mg mL−1 of CD-SN38 (green). (c) CD-SN38 (0.1 mg mL−1, green) and lysosomes (red) co-localization IF in HT29 after 12 h, 24 h, 48 h of incubation. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Fig. 4HT29 microscopic optical images after 0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h without (a–d) and with addition of CDs (e–h), SN38 (i–n) or CD-SN38 (o–r). Scale bar: 100 μm. Cell proliferation at the same conditions (s); n = 6/group. “∗” indicates the significant difference versus HT29 reference sample (CTRL) after 24, 48 and 72 h “∗∗” = p < 0.01, “∗∗∗” = p < 0.001”.
Fig. 5Rhodamine immunofluorescence (IF) of Ki-67 (red) and nucleus (blue) in HT29 cells (a) and after 0.1 mg mL−1 CDs (b), 1 μM SN38 (c) or 0.1 mg mL−1 CD-SN38 (d) addition at 48 h. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representation of a panel of each mitosis phase after each treatment at each time point: Prophase (a1-d1), Metaphase (a2-d2), Anaphase (a3-d3), Telophase (a4-d4), Cytokinesis (a5-d5).
Fig. 6Immunofluorescence (IF) of COLIαI (green) in HT29 (a–c) and after 0.1 mg mL−1 CDs (d–f), 1 μM SN38 (g–i) or 0.1 mg mL−1 CD-SN38 (l–n) addition at 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment (scale bars: 50 μm). (o) Quantification of COLIαI immunostaining. N = 19. ∗ = p < 0.05, ∗∗ = p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001.