| Literature DB >> 36186653 |
Jiepin Wang1,2, Haozhong Xu1, Junxiang Wang1, Dong Xiao1.
Abstract
Objectives: Postoperative enteral nutrition has a significant influence on the prognosis of patients with congenital intestinal atresia. Currently, there is no precise guidance on enteral nutrition management. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of different feeding strategies based on the initial volume and daily advancement in postoperative patients with congenital intestinal atresia.Entities:
Keywords: enteral nutrition; feeding strategy; intestinal atresia; post-surgery; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36186653 PMCID: PMC9515948 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.953852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
Baseline characteristics stratified by postoperative feeding strategies.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases ( | Total | 17 | 15 | |
| Male | 10 | 5 | 0.178 | |
| Female | 7 | 10 | ||
| Age (h) | 19.65 ± 17.83 | 16.60 ± 13.71 | 0.596 | |
| Gestational age(w) | 35.82 ± 2.09 | 34.60 ± 3.24 | 0.21 | |
| Birth weight(kg) | 2.87 ± 0.61 | 2.35 ± 0.68 | 0.033 | |
| Time to initiate EN(d) | 15.26 ± 8.95 | 13.72 ± 8.48 | 0.595 | |
| Length between atresia and the ligament of Treitz (cm) | 67.65 ± 47.73 | 55.13 ± 39.10 | 0.428 | |
| Length of intestinal resection (cm) | 23.82 ± 6.73 | 22.86 ± 11.38 | 0.771 | |
Comparisons of postoperative outcome in children with intestinal atresia stratified by postoperative feeding strategies.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases ( | 17 | 15 | ||
| DB (μmol/L) | Pre-feeding | 16.06 ± 10.64 | 17.19 ± 9.84 | 0.759 |
| Post-feeding | 11.75 ± 5.91 | 21.54 ± 12.94 | 0.009 | |
| change | −4.37 ± 9.71 | 4.34 ± 12.61 | 0.035 | |
| AST (IU/L) | Pre-feeding | 19.23 ± 6.43 | 27.46 ± 19.65 | 0.113 |
| Post-feeding | 23.05 ± 8.72 | 31.20 ± 18.11 | 0.109 | |
| change | 4.64 ± 7.56 | 3.73 ± 26.17 | 0.891 | |
| ALT (IU/L) | Pre-feeding | 8.94 ± 4.05 | 12.33 ± 11.41 | 0.262 |
| Post-feeding | 10.64 ± 4.12 | 24.06 ± 26.13 | 0.045 | |
| change | 1.70 ± 4.39 | 11.73 ± 25.42 | 0.119 | |
| ALB (g/L) | Pre-feeding | 32.62 ± 3.59 | 31.18 ± 4.93 | 0.346 |
| Post-feeding | 33.77 ± 3.69 | 32.81 ± 3.54 | 0.459 | |
| change | 1.14 ± 4.74 | 1.63 ± 4.86 | 0.777 | |
| HGB (g/L) | Pre-feeding | 121.76 ± 27.49 | 111.60 ± 38.44 | 0.392 |
| Post-feeding | 102.94 ± 27.49 | 96.13 ± 19.38 | 0.354 | |
| change | −18.23 ± 18.94 | −15.46 ± 37.25 | 0.746 | |
| Hospital stay (d) | 38.35 ± 20.68 | 49.86 ± 16.12 | 0.092 | |
| 50% EN(d) | 5.47 ± 1.94 | 9.80 ± 3.87 | <0.001 | |
| 100% EN(d) | 9.58 ± 3.16 | 19.13 ± 10.16 | 0.001 | |
| Discharge weight (kg) | 3.27 ± 0.38 | 3.02 ± 0.62 | 0.030 | |
| Length of PN(d) | 19.11 ± 11.28 | 24.06 ± 12.51 | 0.249 | |
| IFALD ( | 5 | 11 | 0.032 | |
| Infection ( | 1 | 2 | 0.589 | |
| Complication ( | 2 | 3 | 0.645 | |
DB, direct bilirubin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALB, hemoglobin; HGB, hemoglobin; EN, enteral nutrition; PN: parenteral nutrition.
Comparison of weight change stratified by postoperative feeding strategies.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-dose group | 2.87 ± 0.61 | 3.27 ± 0.38 | 0.33 ± 0.44 | 0.003 |
| Low-dose group | 3.02 ± 0.62 | 2.35 ± 0.68 | 0.66 ± 0.34 | <0.001 |