When does a statistical fact become an ethical imperative?

Trial of labor is a safe and effective management alternative but remains underused in current clinical practice. To explore whether this underuse is justified, decision analysis is developed to compare a trial of labor with elective repeat cesarean section. With the use of available probability estimates and outcome scoring based on a survey of perinatologists, decision analysis identifies trial of labor as superior to elective repeat cesarean section for both the mother and the neonate. Going beyond the simple comparisons of management options and outcomes, the ethical implications of such results are discussed in terms of "utility ethics," "informed consent," and "universal equality." Such considerations suggest that there is a professional (ethical) responsibility to increase the application of trial of labor.