| Literature DB >> 36186478 |
Min Li1,2,3, Min Liu1,2,3, Shi-Yun Hu1,2,3, Fang-Zhen Luo1,2,3, Ming-Long Yuan1,2,3.
Abstract
The retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) clade is the largest spider lineage within Araneae. To better understand the diversity and evolution, we newly determined mitogenomes of ten RTA species from six families and performed a comparative mitogenomics analysis by combining them with 40 sequenced RTA mitogenomes available on GenBank. The ten mitogenomes encoded 37 typical mitochondrial genes and included a large non-coding region (putative control region). Nucleotide composition and codon usage were well conserved within the RTA clade, whereas diversity in sequence length and structural features was observed in control region. A reversal of strand asymmetry in nucleotide composition, i.e., negative AT-skews and positive GC-skews, was observed in each RTA species, likely resulting from mitochondrial gene rearrangements. All protein-coding genes were evolving under purifying selection, except for atp8 whose Ka/Ks was larger than 1, possibly due to positive selection or selection relaxation. Both mutation pressure and natural selection might contribute to codon usage bias of 13 protein-coding genes in the RTA lineage. Phylogenetic analyses based on mitogenomic data recovered a family-level phylogeny within the RTA; {[(Oval calamistrum clade, Dionycha), Marronoid clade], Sparassidae}. This study characterized RTA mitogenomes and provided some new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the RTA clade.Entities:
Keywords: Entelegynae; comparative mitogenomics; evolutionary analysis; phylogeny; spiders
Year: 2022 PMID: 36186478 PMCID: PMC9515440 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.974084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1The size of PCGs, tRNAs, rrnL, rrnS, and CR among spider mitochondrial genomes of the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. Species are abbreviated as follows: Clubiona sp1, CS1; Clubiona sp2, CS2; Gnaphosa kompirensis, Gk; Gnaphosa licenti, Gl; Gnaphosa sp, Gs; Cheiracanthium erraticum, Ce; Cheiracanthium triviale, Ct; Philodromus cespitum, Pc; Philodromus histrio, Ph; Asemonea sichuanensis, As; Carrhotus xanthogramma, Cx; Cheliceroides longipalpis, Cl; Dendryphantes sp, Ds; Epeus alboguttatus, Ea; Evarcha coreana, Ec; Evarcha sp, Es; Habronattus oregonensis, Ho; Heliophanus lineiventris, Hl; Phanuelus gladstone, Pg; Phidippus sp, Ps; Phintella cavaleriei, Pa; Plexippus paykulli, Py; Telamonia vlijmi, Tv; Selenops bursarius, Sb; Agelena labyrinthica, Al; Agelena silvatica, Ai; Argyroneta aquatica, Aq; Desis jiaxiangi, Dj; Desis martensi, Dm; Heteropoda venatoria, Hv; Alopecosa cursor, Au; Alopecosa licenti, Ac; Halocosa hatanensis, Hh; Lycosa sinensis, Ls; Pardosa laura, Pl; Pardosa sp1, Ps1; Pardosa sp2, Ps2; Pardosa sp3, Ps3; Pirata subpiraticus, Pu; Wadicosa fidelis, Wf; Oxyopes hupingensis, Oh; Oxyopes licenti, Ol; Oxyopes sertatus, Os; Peucetia latikae, Pt; Dolomedes angustivirgatus, Da; Pisaura bicornis, Pb; Heriaeus melloteei, Hm; Misumenops tricuspidata, Mt; Oxytate striatipes, Ot; Thomisus onustus, To.
FIGURE 2AT% vs. AT-skew and GC% vs. GC-skew in the 50 mitochondrial genomes of the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. Measured in bp percentage (Y-axis) and level of nucleotide skew (X-axis). Values are calculated on J-strands for full-length mitochondrial genomes. (A) A + T% vs. AT-skew; (B) G + C% vs. GC-skew. See Figure 1 for the full names of the species.
FIGURE 3A + T% of the mitochondrial protein-coding genes among three groups within the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. The colors of the symbols match those in Figure 2.
FIGURE 4Evaluation of codon bias in the mitochondrial genomes of 50 spider species of the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. G + C%, G + C content of all codon positions; ENC, effective number of codons; CBI, codon bias index. The colors of the symbols match those in Figure 2.
FIGURE 5The correlation between the effective number of codons (ENC) and G + C content of the third codon positions (GC3) for 50 spider species of the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. The colored dots match those in Figure 2. (A) The solid line represents the relationship between the ENC* (2 + GC3 + (29/[(GC3)^2 + (1-GC3)^2]) and the GC3 content. (B) The solid line represents the relationship between the ENC and the GC3 content, whereas the dotted line indicates y = x. GC12, G + C content of the first and second positions.
FIGURE 6Organization of the control regions in the RTA mitochondrial genomes. The location and copy number of tandem repeats are shown in orange and three different depths of red with arabic numbers inside. The boxes colored sky blue represent interval sequences (positive numbers) or overlaps (negative numbers) between two elements.
FIGURE 7Evolutionary rates of 13 protein-coding genes in the mitochondrial genomes of 50 spider species of the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. The left Y-axis provides the substitution rate of the mitochondrial gene, while the right Y-axis provides the G + C content. Synonymous nucleotide substitutions per synonymous site (Ks) and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions per nonsynonymous site (Ka) are calculated using the Kumar method. The standard error estimates are obtained by a bootstrap procedure (1,000 replicates).
FIGURE 8Three phylogenies of 14 families in the retrolateral tibial apophysis clade. Phylogeny 1 is summarized: P123 and P123RNA datasets based on RAxML analysis); Phylogeny 2 from P123AA dataset based on RAxML analysis; Phylogeny 3 from three datasets based on MrBayes analysis. P123, with nucleotide sequences for all codon positions of 13 PCGs; P123RNA, with P123 and the nucleotide sequences of two rRNAs; P123AA, with the inferred amino acid sequences of 13 PCGs. Icons on branches are bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Numbers 1–6 indicated phylogenetic relationships among the 14 families in the RTA clade obtained with different mitogenomic datasets and analytical methods.