The activation of the cGAS-STING pathway has tremendous potential to improve anti-tumor immunity 1. Chromosome instability, DNA damage, oncosuppressor gene mutation and deletion in cancer cells lead to the cytoplasmic DNA accumulation, which is recognized by cyclic-GMP-AMP synthase and then leads to production of 2ʹ,3ʹ-cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate (2ʹ,3ʹ-cGAMP) 1. Cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP, cdG), as well as 3ʹ,3ʹ-cGAMP, and c-di-AMP produced by bacteria, and 2ʹ,3ʹ-cGAMP from mammals, are novel immunotherapeutics that can activate the stimulator of interferon genes (STING), a pattern recognition receptor that localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum, and induce potent type I interferon (IFN-Ⅰ) response, leading to the accumulation and infiltration of CD8+ T cells in tumors 1.(Rp,Rp)Dithio-cyclic[A(2′,5′)pA(3′,5′)p] (ADU-S100) is a candidate in clinical trials (NCT02675439) which profoundly inhibits tumor growth by intratumoral administration (i.t., 50 μg) in CT26 or 4T1 tumor models, however, shows limited clinical activity in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas (50-6400 μg) 2. Small molecule MSA-2 is a potential non-cyclic dinucleotide STING agonist in pre-clinical stage, which significantly inhibits tumor growth and achieves long-term survival rates of 35% and 100% in MC38 mice model with dosage administered orally (80 mg/kg) or subcutaneously (50 mg/kg) 3. However, intense STING activation leads to T cell apoptosis and limits the T cell response with higher dosage 4-6.Recent reports suggest some carriers, including liposomes, polymers, peptides, and inorganic nanoparticles, can reduce the curative dosage of cyclic dinucleotides (cDNs) to below 20 μg in monotherapy 7-19. Encapsulated cDNs can promote the polarization of M1 macrophages, dendric cell priming, and antitumor NK and T cell activation and infiltration in tumor 16,19,20. Furthermore, encapsulated 2',3'-cGAMP (800 nM) potently promotes cancer immunogenic cell death (ICD) in neuroblastoma, which is a promising strategy to enhance the immunogenicity of tumor and trigger the inhibited immune system to kill tumor cells 21. All of the above effects of cDNs (0.1-20 μg) enhance the anti-tumor immunity and achieve effective tumor suppression with 10-60% long term-survival rate in tumor models 7-19,22,23. However, the reported cationic lipid derived delivery systems induced different degrees systematic toxicity, including blood incompatibility, immunogenicity 24-27.A novel delivery system (Mix) developed by our group consists of neutral cytidinyl lipid (DNCA) and cationic lipid (CLD), which can interact with nucleic acid drugs via H-bonding, pi-stacking and electrostatic interaction, and facilitate the nanocomplex formation with appreciable size and zeta potentials 28,29. By local, intravenous or intramuscular injections, Mix can deliver aptamer, antisense oligonucleotide, siRNA and mRNA with remarkable therapeutic effect and safety in vivo 28,30-35. Further optimization of the delivery system, cDNs/Mix have displayed similar immunostimulatory activity and anti-tumor efficacy to other carriers at lower dosage (1 μg, i.t.), as well as ICD induction in melanoma and breast cancer cells (0.5-1.4 μM). Notably, cdG/Mix can reverse the T cell exhaustion (Tex) both in tumor and systemic immune organization, meanwhile down-regulate the mRNA expression of Tox and Nr4a
36.
Materials and Methods
Synthesis of cdG, 2ʹ,3ʹ-cGAMP and 3ʹ,3ʹ-cGAMP
The one-pot phosphoramidite method was adopted to synthesize cdG etc., which was introduced before 37,38. General procedures for synthesis are provided in Supplementary Materials (Scheme ). 1H NMR, 31P NMR and HRMS spectrums of cdG etc. used in this study are provided in the Supplementary Materials ().
Nanoparticle preparation
The DNCA and CLD liposome were dissolved in ethanol for stock solutions (2.5 mM). The cdG were dissolved in dH2O at 125 μM. The PEG2000-DSPE were dissolved in ethanol at 20 μM. Subsequently, 0.4 nmol cdG (3.2 μL), 4 nmol DNCA (1.6 μL), 2.4 nmol CLD (0.96 μL), and 0.032 nmol DSPE-PEG2000 (1.6 μL) was diluted with 72.6 μL PBS (M&C, Beijing, China), or GenOpti (M&C). Afterwards, ultrasonic process the above solution for 30 minutes at 26 °C. As a result, nanocomplexes were obtained (cdG 5 μM, 80 μL) for usage. EntransterTM-in vivo was purchased from Engreen Biosystem Co, Ltd. And cdG-Entranster was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. cdG-NTL was prepared according to the reference 39.
Characterization of nanoparticle
The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential were characterized by Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 instrument with photon correlation spectroscopy at a scattering angle of 90°. Data were analyzed using an ELS-8000 software package. Lipid morphologies were imaged on a 120 kV JEM-1400Plus Transmission Electron Microscope with 10 μL samples (at 0.3 mg/mL).In vitro drug release study was performed as follows: transfer 2 ml of the cdG/Mix(168 μM) into a dialysis bag (Spectrumlabs; 2 kDa molecular weight cut-off), clamp the two sections of the dialysis bag, and then completely immersed into 36 mL PBS. Place the whole device on a magnetic heating stirrer (37 °C, 500 rpm), and 5 μL of buffer was taken at each scheduled time point and quantified using a Thermo NanoDrop 2000C spectrophotometer. The cumulative release rate was calculated according to equation (1), the release was analyzed using first order (2) and Higuchi (3) models.Where,
is the fraction of drug release, k and kare first order rate constant and Higuchi drug release constant.
Cell culture
The B16F10 and EO771 cells were kindly provided by Pro. Ning Tao (Institute of biophysics, Chinese academy of sciences) and cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (M&C) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco). RAW264.7 and THP-1 cells (cell bank of the Committee on Type Culture Collection of Chinese Academy of Science) were cultured in DMEM medium (M&C) and RPMI-1640 medium (M&C), respectively, supplemented with 10% FBS. RAW-Lucia ISG and THP1-Dual ISG cells were kindly provided by Pro. Changpo Chen in Henan Normal University, China and cultured according to the manufacturer's instructions. No authentication of the cell lines was performed by the authors. All cell lines were grown in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C and used before passage 10 after purchase from the vendor.
Induction of type I interferon in RAW-Lucia ISG Cells and THP1-Dual ISG cells
RAW-Lucia ISG cells and THP1-Dual ISG cells were used to determine IRF pathway activation by the indicated formulations. Cells (180 μL) were inoculated in 96 well plates (100,000 cells/well) with DMEM and RPMI-1640 medium, respectively, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Then, cells were stimulated for 18 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator with 20 μL of various cDNs-containing formulations. The quantity of type I interferon was indirectly quantified using QUANTI-Luc (InvivoGen), which was prepared and used according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Flow cytometric analysis of cellular uptake
RAW264.7 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 300,000 cells well-1 1 day before transfection and treated with indicated cdGMP-Dy547 (Axxora) formulations for 2 h at concentrations of 500 nM. Subsequently, the cells were harvested and centrifuged at 1000 g for 3 min, and precipitates were washed by pre-cooled PBS and filtered for a homogeneous distribution in the solution. The cellular cDNs uptake was analyzed on a BD LSRFortessa with 561 nm excitation laser and 582/15 filter configuration.
Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis and calreticulin
Cell apoptosis was detected by Flow cytometry using FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (556547, BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells (2×105 cells/well in a 12-well plate) were treated with PBS, Mix, free cdG, or cdG/Mix for 24 hours. Cells were washed twice with PBS and then resuspended in 1× Binding Buffer. Cells were stained with Annexin V and PI for 15 mins at RT in the dark, and run on the CytoFLEX S flow cytometer (BECHMAN COULTER). Data from three independent experiments were analyzed using CytExpert software.Calreticulin (CRT) expression was detected by Flow cytometry using Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-CRT antibody (Ab196159, Abcam). Cells (2×105 cells/well in a 12-well plate) were treated with PBS, Mix, free cdG, or cdG/Mix for 24 hours. cells were trypsinized, washed in cold PBS, and stained with anti-CRT antibody for 1 h at 4 °C, and stained with PI for 5 mins at RT in the dark then washed three times and re-suspended in cold PBS with 3% FBS and analyzed on a CytoFLEX S flow cytometer (BECHMAN COULTER). Data from three independent experiments were analyzed using CytExpert software.
ATP detection assay
The release of ATP was measured with the ATP Determination Kit (A22066, Molecular Probes). Prepare the reaction solution according to the protocol, mix the cell supernatant or ATP standard after administration with the reaction solution, and luminescence was measured by the LB960 Microplate Luminescence Detector (Berthold). Luminescence was normalized to background from untreated blank group. Results were from three independent experiments.
Confocal microscopy assay
RAW264.7 cells (2 × 104 per well) were cultured at confocal observation dishes and proliferated for 24 h. Then, cdG-Dy547 (500 nM) were exposed to cells and incubated for 1, 2 and 4 h. Subsequently, the culture medium was removed, following by washing twice with PBS. Cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Solarbio) for 15 min and washed twice with PBS, and then observed under an A1Rsi confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc). Confocal images were obtained using NIS-Elements software (Nikon Instruments Inc).
Mouse care and experimentation
Female C57BL/6 mice (6-8 weeks old) were purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Center (Beijing, China). All animals were maintained at the animal facilities of Peking University under specific pathogen-free conditions and treated in accordance with the regulations and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Gene expression analysis following intratumoral administration
Female C57BL/6 mice (6-8 weeks old) were inoculated subcutaneously with 200,000 B16F10 cells. Mice were treated intratumorally with PBS, free cdG (5 μg) or cDNs (5 μg)/Mix when tumors were around 200 mm3. For qPCR analysis, tumors were collected on indicated time points, then grinded and lysed immediately using a TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the standard extraction protocol. For cDNA synthesis, total RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed using the Reverse Transcription System (Promega). Then, the real-time PCR was carried out using an Mx3005P QPCR System (Agilent) and SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Promega). The expression levels were determined by the Ct (cycle threshold) values and analyzed using delta-delta-Ct method. The primers used in the study were listed in Table S1.
Murine tumor experiments
B16F10 cells (200,000) were injected subcutaneously into the flank of 6-8-week-old female C57BL/6 mice suspended in 100 μL of serum-free RPMI 1640 media. Five cdG/Mix etc. injections were given as treatment scheme when tumors grew to between 50-100 mm3. E0771 cells (750,000) were injected subcutaneously into the flank of 6-8week-old female C57BL/6 mice in 100 μL of serum-free RPMI 1640 media. When tumors grew to between 50-100 mm3, cdG/Mix were initially administered by either i.v. or i.t. according to the treatment scheme. The tumor size was measured using caliper, and the tumor volume calculated using the equation V=1/2×L×W2
40.
Flow cytometric analysis in EO771 mice
All tissue preparations were performed after Murine euthanasia. Peripheral blood was collected via mice eye, then transferred into sodium heparin-coated vacuum tubes before dilution in PBS with 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 60-00-4, Aladdin) and 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, 554657, BD Pharmingen). Spleens and lymph nodes were crushed using a sterile syringe piston and screened with a 70 μm cell filter in PBS with 1 mM EDTA and 2% FBS at 4 °C. Cells were centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min at 4 °C and re-suspended in PBS. Tumors were finely minced and digested in RPMI 1640 with Mouse tumor tissue dissociation kit (Miltenyi, 130-096-730), then inverted in the tissue dissociator to run program as the protocol. Cell suspensions were screened with a 70 μm cell filter. After counting, all cells were diluted into 1×106 cells/ml cell suspension for later use. Each 100 ul cell suspension was preincubated with 2 ul CD16/CD32 antibodies at 4 °C for 5 min to block Fc receptors 41.Dead cells were excluded by staining with Live/Dead fixable viability stain 510 (564406, BD Biosciences). Cell surface staining was performed in brilliant stain buffer (563794, BD Horizon) for 30 min at 4 °C in dark. Intracellular staining (CD206 and Granzyme B) was performed with Transcription Factor Buffer Set RUO (562574, BD Pharmingen) after fixing cells with Fix/Perm buffer for 20 min at 4 °C in dark and permeabilizing cells with Intracellular Staining Perm/Wash Buffer. The following anti-mouse antibodies were used: (PE-Cy5)-CD3 (clone BM10-37), (FITC)-CD4 (clone V4), (APC-Cy7)-CD8 (clone 53-6.7), (BUV395)-CD45 (clone 30-F11), (PerCP-Cy5.5)-CD38 (clone 90), (Alexa Fluor 647)-CD101 (clone 307707), (PE-Cy7)-CD86 (clone GL1), (PE-CF594)-CD80 (clone 16-10A1), (PerCP-Cy5.5)-MHC class II (clone M5/114.15.2), (BV605)-CD11c (clone HL3), (BV650)-CD11b (clone M1/70), (PE)-F4/80 (clone T45-2342), (Alexa Fluor 700)-NK-1.1 (clone PK136), (Alexa Fluor 647)-CD206 (clone MR5D3), (PE)-PD-1 (clone J43) and (Pacific Blue)-Granzyme B (clone GB11). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences or BioLegend (only Granzyme B). Stained cells were analyzed on a CytoFLEX S flow cytometry gating strategy flow cytometry gating strategy flow cytometer (BECHMAN COULTER). Data were analyzed using CytExpert software. Flow cytometry gating strategy were showed in .
Liver, kidney function and blood chemistry detection
Mice were sacrificed when tumors grew to 1500 mm3 and then blood was collected via mice eye. Blood was stored at 4 °C overnight and centrifugated at 1000 rpm to collect the serum. Livers were harvested and fixed in a 4% formalin in PBS solution, then embedded in paraffin, sectioned to 3-5 µm, floated on a water bath, picked up onto glass slides, and placed in slide racks for haematoxylin and eosin staining 42.
CD8+ T cells isolation in vivo
Lymph nodes were crushed using a sterile syringe piston and screened with a 70 μm cell filter in PBS with 1 mM EDTA and 2% FBS at 4 °C. Tumors were finely minced and digested in RPMI 1640 with Mouse tumor tissue dissociation kit (Miltenyi, 130-096-730), then inverted in the tissue dissociator to run program as the protocol. Cell suspensions were screened with a 70 μm cell filter. Cells were centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min at 4 °C and re-suspended in PBS. T cells were isolated from tumor and lymph nodes by positive selection with magnetic Dynabeads CD8 (Invitrogen, 11447D), per the manufacturer's protocol.
In vivo depletion
For cellular subsets depletion experiments, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 400 μg depletion antibody twice weekly beginning 1 day before therapy. The depletion antibody are as follows: anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioXCell), anti-CD8α (clone 2.43, BioXCell), anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136, BioXCell) antibodies and isotype control antibody (clone LTF-2, BioXCell) 16. The depletion efficacy was confirmed by flow cytometry of PBMC on day 14 ().
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software package. Difference between groups were analyzed as detailed in figure legends. Comparisons between groups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. The significant differences were represented by P-values: n.s. P>0.05; * P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001; **** P < 0.0001.
Results and Discussion
Optimization of cdG/Mix delivery systems
cDNs activate the STING pathway, leading to the production of IFN-I and proinflammatory cytokines that play a critical role in antitumor immunity 43-45. RAW-Lucia ISG cells with an IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-inducible reporter were selected, in which IFN-I induction as an indicator to evaluate the tumor immunity ability of cdG-containing formulations.In the first round of cell level screening, a formulation of DNCA/CLD/cdG = 10/6/1 (molar ratio, formulation a) in PBS was found to be the best, which stimulated 10 fold IFN-I response compared with that of free cdG in RAW-Lucia ISG cells (Figure , 2B). Then with additional 0.1 mM Ca2+ in a (formulation b), IFN-I induction increased two-fold relative to that of a (Figure ). Addition of 0.5 mol% PEG2000-DSPE in b (formulation c) further increased 100% IFN-I induction compared with formulation b (Figure ). With fluorescently-labeled cdG (cdG-Dy547), formulation c showed the highest proportion of cellular uptake (Figure ).
Characterization of cdG/Mix nanoparticles
Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) images reveal that indicated lipid can self-assemble as spherical vesicles with cdG and nanoparticle diameters were approximately 50-100 nm (Figure ). Consistent with previous observations, dynamic light scattering (DLS) data demonstrate that the size of three indicated formulations were homogenous (PDI < 0.3) at approximately 100 nm, although particle size increased gradually with the addition of composition ingredients (Figure ). The zeta potential of formulations was all negative, however, formulation c was close to electrically neutral (-9.37 ± 7.23 mV) and exhibited higher loading capacity (5.7%) and encapsulation efficiency (94.5%, Table 1). The in vitro stability of these three nanoparticles were evaluated by monitoring the particle size and Zeta potential for 7 days at 4 °C. The results showed that the particle size of the three formulations did not change much, but the Zeta potential of formulations a and b changed significantly, and only formulation c remained stable (Figure ). The release behavior of cdG from various formulation were assessed in PBS (pH 7.4) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C (Figure ). The formulation c showed nonlinear release of cdG both in PBS and 10% FBS. Formulation c achieved slow release of cdG; 50% cdG was released within 25 h and 98% was released within 7 days in PBS (Figure ); 50% cdG was released within 12 h and 100% was released within 4 days in 10% FBS, showing a faster release profile compared to that in PBS (Figure ). However, the formulation a and b both exhibited faster release rate, 50% cdG was released within 5 h and 100% was released within 40 h (). Given that formulation c (hereafter referred to as cdG/Mix) possessed higher loading and encapsulation efficiency, slower release rate of drug and better in vitro stability, cdG/Mix (Figure ) was selected as the optimal formulation for the cDNs delivery and was used for all subsequent studies.
cdG/Mix triggers tumor cell apoptosis and immunogenic cell death in both human and mouse tumor cells
Annexin V/PI staining revealed that both Mix and cdG/Mix treatment induced higher levels of apoptosis in human and mouse melanoma (A375 and B16F10) and breast cancer (MCF-7 and EO771) cells (Figure ) relative to PBS. Nevertheless, Mix induced limited apoptosis in B16F10 (Figure ).ICD promoted antigen cross-presentation and provided an inflammatory context for generating antigen-specific T cell responses 21. The hallmarks of ICD, including cell-surface calreticulin (CRT) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release, were significantly elevated on A375, B16F10, MCF7 and EO771 cells (Figure ), suggesting that both Mix and cdG/Mix triggered ICD in indicated cancer cell lines. Notably, neither Mix nor cdG/Mix elicited any signature of apoptosis in normal cells, including HFL-1 (human lung epithelial fibroblasts) cells and RAW264.7 cells ().
Enhanced immunostimulatory activity of cdG/Mix etc. in vitro and in vivo
DC maturation is critical for antigen presentation and the initiation of subsequent T cell immune responses 46. To test the ability of cdG/Mix etc. to promote the maturation of DCs, naïve BMDCs was treated for 24 h with indicated formulations. Notably, cdG/Mix 3',3'-cGAMP/Mix and 2',3'-cGAMP/Mix all significantly increased the expression of CD40, MHCII, CD80 and CD86 in BMDCs around 2-fold compared with free cdG (Figure ).In addition, the three natural cDNs (cdG, 3',3'-cGAMP and 2',3'-cGAMP) encapsulated by Mix elicited substantial IFN-I release in RAW-Lucia ISG and THP1-Dual ISG cells relative to PBS and free cdG (Figure ). Consistent with this, the cdG/Mix etc. led to significantly upregulated Ifnb and Cxcl10 mRNA levels in RAW cells relative to PBS and free cdG (Figure ). Furthermore, cdG/Mix, 3',3'-cGAMP/Mix and 2',3'-cGAMP/Mix all significantly up-regulated Cxcl9 and Cxcl10 mRNA level in the TME of B16F10-burdened mice by 3 to 15-fold compared to free cdG, which were critical chemokines of antitumor T-cell activation and recruitment (Figure ).
Enhanced anti-tumor efficacy of cdG/Mix etc. in the B16F10 melanoma model
Mice were treated with cdG (5 μg)/Mix etc. (i.t.) when tumors were palpable and then treated according to scheme with a total of five injections (Figure ). Once the last injection was complete, mice were monitored continuously until they reached the study endpoint (1500 mm3). Administration with the cdG/Mix etc. effectively inhibited tumor growth relative to PBS and free cdG (Figure ). 2',3'-cGAMP/Mix, 3',3'-cGAMP/Mix and cdG/Mix showed equal efficacy on tumor progression inhibition and significantly increased the long-term survival rate of B16F10 murine models to 33.3% (2/6), 42.9% (3/7) and 16.7% (1/6), respectively, and no tumor burden was observed until 50 days post the treatment (Figure ). These survival mice was rechallenged with 105 B16F10 tumor cells and tumor volume was monitored. Five of six (83%) rechallenged mice showed no tumor growth through at least 110 days without any additional treatment compared to age-matched control mice (Figure ). During the treatment period, the mice gained moderate weight and the blood biochemical indexes of liver and kidney functions were within the normal extent (Figure ).
cdG/Mix enhance the anti-tumor immunology activity at lower doses by alternative route of administration
The EO771 model, a kind of TNBC model that was the most aggressive form of breast cancer and lacked effective targeted therapy 47, was chose to evaluate the multiple anti-tumor activity of cdG/Mix and explore a lower dosage with optimal curative effect in tumor-burdened mice. cdG (1 μg)/Mix (i.t.) administration significantly inhibited tumor growth and showed equal anti-tumor efficacy to 5 and 10 μg cdG/Mix, achieving an almost 10-fold reduction of effective dose (Figure ). Importantly, treatment with cdG (1, 5 and 10 μg)/Mix (i.t.) significantly increased the survival rate of EO771 tumor model to 30%, 22% and 20%, respectively, and no tumor burden was observed until 90 days post treatment (Figure ). cdG (5 μg)/Mix (i.t.) showed significant reduction in tumor volume compared to PBS (P = 0.015), however, control preparations, cdG-NTL and cdG-Entranster, showed limited benefits in tumor suppression and survival of mice, suggesting the advantages of Mix delivery system (Figure ) 39. 3',3'-cGAMP delivered with Ace-DEX MPs (polymer) can inhibit tumor growth at the lowest dosage (0.1 μg i.t., seven injections) reported so far with an inferior long-term survival rate (10%) 16. However, 3',3'-cGAMP (10 μg) showed stronger anti-tumor efficacy over other pathogen associated molecular patterns when delivered with Ace-DEX MPs 16. cdG (1 μg)/Mix (i.t.) maintained a higher long-term survival rate at a lower dose and injection frequency, achieving a balance between dose and anti-tumor efficacy. cdG (10 μg)/Mix (i.v.) significantly inhibited tumor growth, showing equal anti-tumor efficacy to intratumoral administration (Figure ) and the long term-survival rate increased to 11% (Figure ). These results demonstrate that cdG/Mix (i.v.) could serve as an alternative route of administration to patients with non-accessible tumors, providing promising and durable anti-tumor activity and moderate survival benefit. During the treatment period, the mice gained moderate weight and the blood biochemical indexes of liver and kidney functions were within the normal extent (Figure ).Next, these survival mice were rechallenged with 3.5×105 EO771 cells and monitored tumor volume. Seven of eight (87.5%) rechallenged mice showed no tumor growth through at least 60 days post rechallenge without any additional treatment and the remaining one mouse showed slower tumor growth than controls (Figure ). Fourteen days post rechallenge, the blood of living rechallenged mice were collected and analyzed to estimate the percentages of CD8+ or CD4+ central memory T (Tcm, CD44highCD62Lhigh) cells and effector memory T (Tem, CD44highCD62Llow) cells. cdG/Mix significantly improved the proportion of Tem and Tcm in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells among rechallenged mice (Figure ), which revealed that cdG/Mix induced the immune memory effects in mice to against tumor recurrence.
cdG/Mix boosts NK and CD8+ T cell activation in tumor and systemic immune organization
The impact of cdG/Mix on the immunocellular composition of tumor and systemic immune organization in EO771 tumor-bearing mice was explored either. Mice were inoculated with EO771 tumor cells and treated with a single dose of PBS, cdG (5 μg) or cdG (5 μg)/Mix. Mice were sacrificed 48 h after administration, and then tumors, tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN), spleen and peripheral blood were harvested for subsequent flow cytometry. A single intratumoral injection of cdG/Mix substantially increased the fraction of infiltrating CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in TME and TDLN relative to free cdG and PBS (Figure ). cdG/Mix also increased the proportion of CD8+ T cells in blood and CD4+ T cells in the spleen (Figure ). Furthermore, the CD8+/CD4+ ratio of TDLN and blood were significantly increased in the cdG/Mix group, a commonly reported independent favorable prognostic factor (Figure ) 48-50. No significant fraction changes occur in the other leukocyte populations (Figure ).Additionally, activated cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (defined as granzyme B+ PD-1-) significantly accumulated within the TME, spleen and blood of mice treated by cdG/Mix, which is a positive indicator of survival in patients with resected disease and response to immunotherapy in advanced cancer cases (Figure ) 51. The granzyme B+ PD-1- CD8+ T cells also increased within TDLN although the increase was not statistically significant (). Meanwhile, the percentage of granzyme B+ NK cells within tumor and immune systems also significantly increased, suggesting that cdG/Mix induced activation of cytotoxic NK cells both within tumors and systemically relative to PBS and cdG, although the percentage of NK cells was not significantly increased (Figure ).cdG/Mix treatment mainly induced activation and recruitment of CD8+ T and NK cells within tumors and to some extent systemically, consistent with previous observations that cdG/Mix caused the immediate climbing of Cxcl9 and Cxcl10 chemokines responsible for driving the trafficking of CD8+ T cells and NK cells 52 mRNA expression in tumors (Figure ).
CD8+ T cells were critical to anti-tumor immune response generated by cdG/Mix
Antibody depletion studies were performed to define the key cells for anti-tumor effect induced by cdG/Mix in the E0771 mouse. In vivo depletion experiments showed that tumor volume in mice treated with cdG/Mix + anti-CD8 depletion antibody was significantly bigger than that in mice treated with cdG/Mix + Isotype and was almost identical to that of PBS + Isotype group (Figure ). In addition, anti-CD8 depletion also led to significant reductions in overall survival rates and median survival compared to cdG/Mix + Isotype group (Figure ). The above results demonstrated that CD8+ T cells were critical to tumor rejection in cdG/Mix treatment. Tumor volume in mice treated with cdG/Mix + anti-NK depletion antibody was bigger than that in mice treated with cdG/Mix + Isotype and was significantly smaller to that of PBS + Isotype group, suggesting that NK cells contribute partially to tumor inhibition in cdG/Mix treatment (Figure ). In contrast, mice treated with cdG/Mix + anti-CD4 depletion antibody showed similar tumor volume to that in mice treated with cdG/Mix + Isotype and significantly increased the longterm-survival rate to 50% (Figure ), possibly due to the depletion of CD4+ T regulatory cells.
cdG/Mix reverses T cell exhaustion in tumor and systemic immune organization
Tex is common in tumors, along with a state of impaired effector functions, high expression of inhibitory receptors, transcriptional reprogramming, and defective immune memory, all of which prevent optimal control of tumors 36. Here, the potential of cdG/Mix to reverse Tex within tumor and the systemic immune system in EO771 tumor-bearing mice was explored by detecting the expression of CD101 and CD38, which were recently identified as evidence of permanent T cell dysfunction 41,53. cdG/Mix significantly decreased the CD101+ CD38+ CD8+ T cell proportions among tumor and systemic immune organization relative to PBS and free cdG, suggesting cdG/Mix can reverse Tex in TME and even, to some extent, systemically (Figure ).TOX and NR4A were recently reported to be key transcription factors imposing CD8+ T cell exhaustion 54,55. Tox and Nr4a mRNA expression in the CD8+ T cells isolated from tumor and TDLN of EO771-burdened mice was detected at 48 h after treatment with cdG (5 μg)/Mix. cdG/Mix significantly inhibited the mRNA expression of Tox and Nr4a to ~20% - 40% both in tumor and TDLN relative to PBS, suggesting that cdG/Mix could interfere with the expression of Tox and Nr4a mRNA to reverse the Tex (Figure ). Confocal results of RAW264.7 cells revealed that cdG-Dy547/Mix at 2 h showed co-localization with the nucleus in many cells, suggesting the possibility of cdG/Mix modulating Tox and Nr4a mRNA directly or indirectly in the nucleus ().
Conclusion
Mix, a novel delivery system, enhances the cytosolic delivery of cDNs, possessing an excellent anti-tumor immunology effect in two murine tumor models by inducing ICD of tumor cells. cDNs/Mix (i.t.) can significantly inhibit tumor growth, prolong survival of tumor-burden mice, induce the immune memory effects and lead to 83% and 87.5% of mice obtain the resistance to B16F10 and EO771 tumor, respectively. Compared with other reported delivery system, cDNs/Mix maintain a higher long-term survival rate at a lower dose, achieving a balance between dose and anti-tumor efficacy. In addition, cdG (10 μg)/Mix (i.v.) also significantly inhibited tumor growth with 11% long-term survival, offering a treatment opportunity to patients with non-accessible cancer. Furthermore, the cdG/Mix reversed the Tex systemically by interfering with the expression of Tox and Nr4a, leading to the potent recruitment and activation of NK and CD8+ T cells. In conclusion, cDNs/Mix could be a promising alternative strategy for cancer immunotherapy. Exploration of mechanism of cdG modulating Tex may shed new light on the development of immunotherapies.Supplementary figures and tables.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Melissa C Hanson; Monica P Crespo; Wuhbet Abraham; Kelly D Moynihan; Gregory L Szeto; Stephanie H Chen; Mariane B Melo; Stefanie Mueller; Darrell J Irvine Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Funda Meric-Bernstam; Randy F Sweis; F Stephen Hodi; Wells A Messersmith; Robert H I Andtbacka; Matthew Ingham; Nancy Lewis; Xinhui Chen; Marc Pelletier; Xueying Chen; Jincheng Wu; Sarah M McWhirter; Thomas Müller; Nitya Nair; Jason J Luke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yang Liu; Lulu Wang; Qianqian Song; Muhammad Ali; William N Crowe; Gregory L Kucera; Gregory A Hawkins; Shay Soker; Karl W Thomas; Lance D Miller; Yong Lu; Christina R Bellinger; Wei Zhang; Amyn A Habib; W Jeffrey Petty; Dawen Zhao Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 40.523
Authors: Christopher J Nicolai; Natalie Wolf; I-Chang Chang; Georgia Kirn; Assaf Marcus; Chudi O Ndubaku; Sarah M McWhirter; David H Raulet Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2020-03-20
Authors: Carola H Ries; Michael A Cannarile; Sabine Hoves; Jörg Benz; Katharina Wartha; Valeria Runza; Flora Rey-Giraud; Leon P Pradel; Friedrich Feuerhake; Irina Klaman; Tobin Jones; Ute Jucknischke; Stefan Scheiblich; Klaus Kaluza; Ingo H Gorr; Antje Walz; Keelara Abiraj; Philippe A Cassier; Antonio Sica; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Karin E de Visser; Antoine Italiano; Christophe Le Tourneau; Jean-Pierre Delord; Hyam Levitsky; Jean-Yves Blay; Dominik Rüttinger Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Mary Philip; Lauren Fairchild; Liping Sun; Ellen L Horste; Steven Camara; Mojdeh Shakiba; Andrew C Scott; Agnes Viale; Peter Lauer; Taha Merghoub; Matthew D Hellmann; Jedd D Wolchok; Christina S Leslie; Andrea Schietinger Journal: Nature Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 49.962