| Literature DB >> 36185472 |
Aida Muntsant1,2, Lydia Giménez-Llort1,2.
Abstract
Coping with emotional stressors strongly impacts older people due to their age-related impaired neuroendocrine and immune systems. Elevated cortisol levels seem to be associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), alterations in the innate immune system result in crosstalk between immune mediators and neuronal and endocrine functions. Besides, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, or agitation are observed in most patients. Here, we studied the psychophysiological response to intrinsic (AD-phenotype) and extrinsic (anxiogenic tests) stress factors and their relation to liver, kidneys, heart, and spleen oxidative status in 18-months-old female gold-standard C57BL/6 mice and 3xTg-AD mice model for AD. The emotional, cognitive, and motor phenotypes were assessed under three different anxiogenic conditions. Survival, frailty index, and immunoendocrine status (corticosterone levels and oxidative stress of peripheral organs) were evaluated. Genotype differences in neuropsychiatric-like profiles and cognitive disfunction in 3xTg-AD females that survived beyond advanced stages of the disease persisted despite losing other behavioral and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) physiological differences. A secondary analysis studied the impact of social isolation, naturally occurring in 3xTg-AD mice due to the death of cage mates. One month of isolation modified hyperactivity and neophobia patterns and disrupt the obsessive-compulsive disorder-like digging ethogram. Frailty index correlated with spleen organometrics in all groups, whereas two AD-specific salient functional correlations were identified: (1) Levels of corticosterone with worse performance in the T-maze, (2) and with a lower splenic GPx antioxidant enzymatic activity, which may suppose a potent risk of morbidity and mortality in AD.Entities:
Keywords: 3xTg-AD mice; Alzheimer’s disease; aging; cognition; neuroimmunoendocrine crosstalk; neuropsychiatric symptoms; social isolation; translational neuroscience
Year: 2022 PMID: 36185472 PMCID: PMC9520301 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.969381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.702
FIGURE 1Salient behavioral alterations in 18-month-old female 3xTg-AD mice in the open field tests compared to NTg females with normal aging. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (A) OF: Open field test Horizontal activity: left, time course; and right, total distance; (B) vertical activity: left, time course; and right, total number; (C) speed; (D) freezing response. Statistics: Students t-test: G, genotype effect, G *p < 0.05, G **p < 0.01, G ***p < 0.001. ANOVA for comparisons between all the groups of mice followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test: *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.01 vs. the NTg-group. Paired t-test, TT p < 0.01 vs. the same group on Day 1.
FIGURE 3Survival, physical health, HPA axis, and peripheral oxidative stress in 18-month-old 3xTg-AD females compared to NTg females with normal aging. (A) Survival; (B) body weight; (C) frailty index scores; (D) HPA axis measured by Corticosterone levels; (E) organometrics of spleen: weight and spleen index (relative weight, % vs. body weight); Oxidative Stress of liver, kidney, heart, and spleen: (F) GSH levels; (G) GPx enzymatic activity and (H) GR enzymatic activity. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. HC (high corticosterone levels), LC (low corticosterone levels). Statistics: Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank test; G, genotype effect, G *p < 0.05. Student t-test, *p < 0.05 vs. LC counterparts. Pearson’s correlation analysis, ©p < 0.05; ©©p < 0.01; TM, T-maze test; FI, frailty index.
Convergence of 18-month-old NTg and 3xTg-AD females’ phenotypes in the corner test, open field test and object recognition test.
| NTg mice ( | 3xTg-AD ( | 3xTg-AD-ISO ( | ||||
| Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | G | Mean ± SEM | G | ISO | |
|
| ||||||
| Visited corners ( | 7.22 ± 0.88 | 5.88 ± 1.27 |
| 5.56 ± 0.85 |
|
|
| Rearing (latency, s) | 17.89 ± 3.02 | 16.63 ± 3.81 |
| 13.11 ± 3.32 |
|
|
| Rearings (number) | 1.44 ± 0.29 | 1.88 ± 0.58 |
| 2.56 ± 0.41 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Initial freezing (latency, s) | 20.56 ± 13.79 | 3.00 ± 0.63 |
| 5.00 ± 0.87 |
|
|
| Exit of the center (latency, s) | 28.33 ± 13.98 | 9.75 ± 1.94 |
| 44.78 ± 31.96 |
|
|
| Entrance to the periphery (latency, s) | 78.33 ± 37.12 | 64.75 ± 31.60 |
| 94.33 ± 41.35 |
|
|
| Vertical activity (latency, s) | 161.78 ± 38.45 | 175.38 ± 41.39 |
| 210.22 ± 33.49 |
|
|
| Bizarre, vertical rearing (latency, s) | 265.33 ± 26.1 | 207.88 ± 42.5 |
| 295.89 ± 4.1 |
|
|
| Self-grooming (latency, s) | 161.00 ± 26.49 | 147.50 ± 27.36 |
| 161.33 ± 28.44 |
|
|
| Self-grooming ( | 1.33 ± 0.29 | 1.25 ± 0.25 |
| 1.00 ± 0.24 |
|
|
| Defecation boli ( | 2.78 ± 0.46 | 3.63 ± 0.84 |
| 3.00 ± 0.50 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Initial freezing (latency, s) | 20.11 ± 8.12 | 9.71 ± 2.53 |
| 7.00 ± 2.15 |
|
|
| Exit of the center (latency, s) | 23.44 ± 7.80 | 17.29 ± 3.99 |
| 13.38 ± 4.39 |
|
|
| Entrance to the periphery (latency, s) | 23.44 ± 8.52 | 24.57 ± 6.22 |
| 23.50 ± 7.77 |
|
|
| Vertical activity (latency, s) | 50.67 ± 6.72 | 53.86 ± 4.09 |
| 40.50 ± 7.62 |
|
|
| Bizarre, vertical rearing (latency, s) | 60.00 ± 0.00 | 60.00 ± 0.00 |
| 60.00 ± 0.00 |
|
|
| Self-grooming (latency, s) | 56.67 ± 3.33 | 60.00 ± 0.00 |
| 59.00 ± 0.94 |
|
|
| Self-grooming ( | 0.33 ± 0.17 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 0.14 ± 0.13 |
|
|
| Defecation boli ( | 1.22 ± 0.46 | 0.29 ± 0.17 |
| 0.14 ± 0.13 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Latency 1st object (s) | 142.67 ± 76.52 | 60.29 ± 42.74 |
| 60.13 ± 19.48 |
|
|
| Latency 2nd object (s) | 235.00 ± 65.45 | 362.57 ± 85.02 |
| 238.00 ± 80.77 |
|
|
| Time 1, acquisition criteria (s) | 551.00 ± 40.01 | 490.71 ± 50.53 |
| 408.88 ± 73.64 |
|
|
| Total touch duration (s) | 10.50 ± 2.58 | 12.14 ± 2.95 |
| 14.12 ± 2.35 |
|
|
| Animals to reach acquisition criteria | 1/9 | 3/8 |
| 4/9 |
|
|
Statistics: Results are expressed as mean ± SEM or incidence. Student t-test, G, genotype effect (vs. NTg mice), ISO, isolation effect in 3xTg-AD mice (vs. 3xTg-AD mice housed in groups). All n.s., p > 0.05.
FIGURE 2Salient behavioral alterations in 18-month-old female 3xTg-AD females in the T-maze and marble test compared to NTg females with normal aging. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM or incidence (%). (A) Ethogram in the acquisition trial (TM1) in the T-Maze; (B) rate of success in TM1; (C) ethogram in the recall trial (TM2) in the T-Maze; (D) rate of success in TM2; (E) spatial Working memory in TM2; (F) MB: Marble test, Interaction with marbles. Inset of bars, number of animals exhibiting the behavior. Statistics: Students t-test: #, isolation effect, #p < 0.05. Pearson’s correlation analysis, ©©p < 0.01; ©©p < 0.001; CORT: corticosterone levels.