| Literature DB >> 36185435 |
Di Zhang1, Shuyi Liu1, Jianguo Guan1, Fangzhi Mou1.
Abstract
Traditional drug delivery systems opened the gate for tumor-targeted therapy, but they generally took advantage of enhanced permeability and retention or ligand-receptor mediated interaction, and thus suffered from limited recognition range (<0.5 nm) and low targeting efficiency (0.7%, median). Alternatively, micro/nanorobots (MNRs) may act as emerging "motile-targeting" drug delivery platforms to deliver therapeutic payloads, thereby making a giant step toward effective and safe cancer treatment due to their autonomous movement and navigation in biological media. This review focuses on the most recent developments of MNRs in "motile-targeting" drug delivery. After a brief introduction to traditional tumor-targeted drug delivery strategies and various MNRs, the representative applications of MNRs in "motile-targeting" drug delivery are systematically streamlined in terms of the propelling mechanisms. Following a discussion of the current challenges of each type of MNR in biomedical applications, as well as future prospects, several promising designs for MNRs that could benefit in "motile-targeting" drug delivery are proposed. This work is expected to attract and motivate researchers from different communities to advance the creation and practical application of the "motile-targeting" drug delivery platforms.Entities:
Keywords: drug delivery; micro/nanomotors; micro/nanorobots; self-propulsion; tumor targeting
Year: 2022 PMID: 36185435 PMCID: PMC9523273 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1002171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Schematic illustration of “motile-targeting” drug delivery of micro/nanorobots (MNRs).
FIGURE 2Categories and representative examples of MNRs. (A) Chemically-powered MNRs. (A1) Bubble propulsion: tubular catalytic microrobot propelled by O2-bubble ejection in an aqueous H2O2 solution. (Manjare et al., 2013) Copyright 2013. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (A2) Self-diffusiophoresis: polymerization-powered microrobot. (Pavlick et al., 2011) Copyright 2011. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (A3) Self-electrophoresis: Au‒Pt bimetallic nanorod propelled by a self-electrophoresis mechanism in an aqueous H2O2 solution (Paxton et al., 2004). Copyright 2004. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (A4) Surface tension gradient: autonomous motors powered by the rapid depolymerization reaction of poly (2-ethyl cyanoacrylate) (PECA). (Zhang et al., 2013) Copyright 2013. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (B) External-field-powered MNRs. (B1) Magnetic field: magnetic field propelled micromotor (Dreyfus et al., 2005). (B2) Ultrasound: metallic micro-rods propelled by ultrasound. (Wang et al., 2012) Copyright 2012. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (B3) Light: an isotropic TiO2 microrobot powered by UV light. (Chen et al., 2017) Copyright 2017. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (B4) Electric field: rod-like nanorobots powered by an electric field. (Calvo-Marzal et al., 2010) Copyright 2010. Reproduced with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Biohybrid MNRs. (C1) Muscle cells: a muscle-cell-driven hybrid microrobot (Williams et al., 2014) (C2) Bacteria: bacteria-driven microswimmers based on polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) magnetic nanoparticles attached to an E. coli MG1655 bacterium. (Park et al., 2017) Copyright 2017. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (C3) Sperms: sperm-hybrid microrobots for drug delivery in the female reproductive tract. (Xu et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (C4) Immune cells: nanoparticle-loaded neutrophil micromotors. (Shao et al., 2017) Copyright 2017. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons.
Chemically-powered MNRs for motile-targeting drug delivery.
| Energy sources | Composition | Environment | Motion behavior | Loaded cargo/therapeutic drugs | Biomedical application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2O2 | CNTDOX-Fe3O4-Tf/COX-Fe3O4-mAb nanobots |
| PBS: 0.338 mm/s, DMEM: 0.831 mm/s, blood serum: 1.011 mm/s (0.5% H2O2) | DOX hydrochloride | Chemotherapy for tumor |
|
| Dual-drive hybrid micromotors (PS@Fe3O4@Pt-PS) |
| ≈12.5 μm/s (10% H2O2) | N.A. | Drug delivery in future |
| |
| Graphene/FeOx-MnO2 micromotors |
| Average speed 89 ± 59 μm/s (0.03% H2O2) | N.A. | N.A. |
| |
| PEG-PS polymersome-based Janus nanomotors |
| N.A. | Fluorescein sodium salt (model drug) | Drug delivery |
| |
| Water | PACT-guided microrobotic system |
| < 1 mm/min | DOX | Drug delivery |
|
| Qβ VLPs-loaded Mg-based micromotors |
| Average speed in intraperitoneal (IP) fluid ≈60 μm/s | Qβ VLPs | Cancer immunotherapy (ovarian cancer) |
| |
| Mg-Fe3O4-based Magneto-fluorescent nanorobots |
| 0.393 ± 0.07 mm/s in serum with 1.0 M NaHCO3 | N.A. | Capture and isolate tumor cells |
| |
| L-arginine | NO-driven nanomotors |
| HLA10: 3 μm/s, HLA15:8 μm/s, HLA20:13 μm/s | NO, HPAM, L-citrulline | Various diseases (e.g., tumor) |
|
| Native acid | Calcium carbonate micromotors |
| 0.544 μm/s | N.A. | Drug delivery for cancer treatment |
|
| Micromotor toxoids |
| ∼200 μm/s | Antigen | Gastrointestinal drug delivery |
| |
| Macrophage-Magnesium biohybrid micromotors |
| Average speed ≈127.3 μm/s | N.A. | Endotoxin neutralization |
| |
| Poly (aspartic acid)/iron−zinc microrockets |
| ≈29.2 ± 7.9 μm/s (gastric acid simulant) | DOX | Chemotherapy (gastric cancer) |
| |
| Collagen (collagenase) | Collagenase-powered MF-NPs coated microswimmers |
| ≈22 μm/s (collagen solution) | Multifunctional nanoparticles | Potential for Cargo delivery |
|
| H2O2 (catalase) | Ultrasmall stomatocyte polymersomes |
| From 13.69 ± 1.11 to 20.52 ± 0.35 μm/s (2–20 mM H2O2) | N.A. | Potential for cargo delivery |
|
| Glucose (GOx) | Dual enzyme-functionalized core-shell nanomotors |
| N.A. | Photosensitizer, upconversion nanoparticles | Synergetic photodynamic and starvation therapy |
|
| Urea (urease) | enzyme-powered Janus platelet micromotors |
| ≈7 μm/s (200 mM urea concentration) | DOX | Various disease (e.g., breast cancer) |
|
| Multilayer-urea -based Janus Au/MMPs |
| 21.5 ± 0.8 μm/s (physiological urea concentrations (10 mM)) | N.A. | Potential for drug delivery |
| |
| Urease-powered silica NPs based nanomotors |
| N.A. | N.A. | Targeted bladder cancer therapy |
| |
| Enzyme-powered gated mesoporous silica nanomotors |
| N.A. | DOX, [Ru (bpy)3]Cl2 (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) | Intracellular Payload Delivery |
|
FIGURE 3Motile drug delivery by peroxide-powered MNRs. (A) Poly (ethylene glycol)-b-polystyrene (PEG-PS) polymersome-based Janus nanomotors. (Peng et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (B) Dual-drive hybrid micromotors (PS@Fe3O4@Pt-PS). (Chen et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier Inc. (C) Multi-component magnetic nanobot designed by chemically conjugating magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs), anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibody (anti-EpCAM mAb) to multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNT) loaded with DOX. (Andhari et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee Springer Nature.
FIGURE 4Motile drug delivery by biocompatible fuel-powered MNRs. (A) Macrophage-magnesium biohybrid micromotor. (Zhang et al., 2019) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (B) Bacteriophage virus-like nanoparticles (QβVLPs)-loaded Mg-based micromotors. (Wang C et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (C) Mg-Fe3O4-based Magneto-fluorescent nanorobot. (Wavhale et al., 2021) Copyright 2021. The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee Springer Nature. (D) Poly (aspartic acid)/iron-zinc microrockets. (Zhou et al., 2019) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (E) Calcium carbonate micromotors. (Guix et al., 2016) Copyright 2016. The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee Springer Nature. (F) NO-driven nanomotors. (Wan et al., 2019) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from Springer Nature.
FIGURE 5Motile drug delivery by enzyme-powered MNRs. (A) Enzyme-powered Janus platelet micromotor. (Tang et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from American Association for the Advancement of Science. (B) Multilayer-urea-based Janus Au/magnetic microparticles. (Luo et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (C) Enzyme-powered gated mesoporous silica nanomotors. (Llopis-Lorente et al., 2019b) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (D) Enzyme-powered Janus Au-mesoporous silica nanoparticles. (Llopis-Lorente et al., 2019a) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
External-field-powered MNRs for motile-targeting drug delivery.
| Energy sources | Representative examples | Environment | Motion behavior | Loaded cargo/therapeutic drugs | Biomedical application | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light | NIR | Pt NPs modified polymer multilayer micromotors |
| Maximum speed ≈62 μm/s | N.A. | Photothermal therapy |
|
| MPCM@JMSNMs |
| 0.9 μm/s ∼ 5.98 μm/s | Propidium iodide | Drug delivery for cancer |
| ||
| Membrane-cloaked Janus polymeric motors |
| 2.33 μm/s ∼ 19.8 μm/s | Heparin | Drug delivery and Photothermal therapy for thrombus |
| ||
| Photothermally-driven polymersome nanomotors |
| ≈1.9 μm/s ∼ 6.2 μm/s | Propidium iodide | Intracellular Drug delivery |
| ||
| Platelet-derived porous nanomotors |
| Maximum speed ≈4.5 μm/s | Urokinase | Thrombus therapy |
| ||
|
| Heparin | ||||||
| Janus calcium carbonate particle micromotors |
| 2.9 μm/s ∼ 7.3 μm/s | DOX | Drug delivery |
| ||
| X-ray | Half-copper-coated silica (Cu/SiO2) Janus microparticles |
| Maximum speed ≈1.2 μm/s | N.A. | Potential for enhancing diagnosis and radiotherapy |
| |
| UV | Photoelectrochemical TiO2-Au-nanowire-based motors |
| Speed of 5.6 ± 1.5 μm/s | N.A. | Ocular disease (neural RGC stimulation) |
| |
| Ultrasound | Asparaginase-modified nanowire motors |
| 5 μm/s ∼ 60 μm/s | Asparaginase | Cancer cells inhibition |
| |
| Cas9-sgRNA@AuNW motors |
| ≈22 μm/s | Cas9-sgRNA Complex | Drug delivery (e.g., gene therapy) |
| ||
| Liquid metal nanomachines |
| 4.6 μm, 420 kHz, 47.4 μm/s | N.A. | Photothermal therapy for cancer |
| ||
| AuNS functionalized polymer multilayer tubular nanoswimmers |
| 5 μm/s ∼ 80 μm/s | N.A. | Potential for various biomedical applications (e.g., gene delivery) |
| ||
| RBCM-micromotors |
| Maximum speed ≈56.5 μm/s | Oxygen and ICG | Photodynamic cancer therapy |
| ||
| Magnetic field | Multifunctional nanorobot systems (MF-NRS) |
| 4.5 ± 2.2–10.37 ± 5.3 mm/s | DOX | Chemo-phototherapy for cancer |
| |
|
| |||||||
| HADMSC-based medical microrobots |
| N.A. | Mesenchymal stem cell | Cartilage repair |
| ||
|
| |||||||
| Bilayer hydrogel sheet-type intraocular microrobots |
| N.A. | DOX | Ocular disease (e.g., retinoblastoma) |
| ||
| Leukocyte-inspired mult-ifunctional microrollers |
| 600 μm/s | DOX | Various diseases (e.g., cancer) |
| ||
| Photosynthetic bohybrid nanoswimmers |
| Maximum speed ≈78.3 μm/s | Chlorophyll | Cancer treatment |
| ||
|
| |||||||
| Sequential magneto-actuated and optics-triggered biomicrorobots |
| Average speed: 13.3 ± 4.5 μm/s | ICG nanoparticles | Various disease (e.g., cancer) |
| ||
|
| |||||||
| ICG/R837 loading and DPA-PEG coating magnetic nanoparticles |
| N.A. | ICG and immune-ostimulator R837 hydrochloride | Photothermal/immunotherapy for cancer |
| ||
| Magnetic tri-bead microrobots |
| Average velocity: 14.5 μm/s | DOX | Photothermal therapy and chemotherapy |
| ||
| Magnetic-actuated “capillary container” |
| N.A. | N.A. | Selective fluid colle-ction, drug delivery |
| ||
| Personalized magnetic micromachines |
| Maximum speed: 9.3–9.8 μm/s | Cell tracker deep red dye | Potential for drug delivery |
| ||
| Au-Ni nanowires |
| 6.35–21.5 μm/s | DOX and ssDNA | Drug delivery |
| ||
| Nickel-based spherical Janus magnetic microrobots |
| 0.97 ± 0.27 mm/s | N.A. | Potential for drug delivery |
| ||
FIGURE 6Motile drug delivery by ultrasound-powered MNRs. (A) Red blood cell mimicking-micromotor. (Hansen-Bruhn et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (B) Shape-transformable, fusible rodlike swimming liquid metal nanomachine. (Wang et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (C) Cas9-sgRNA@gold nanowire (AuNW) motor. (Gao et al., 2019) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 7Motile drug delivery by magnetic-field-powered MNRs. (A) Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hADMSC)-based medical microrobot. (Go et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from American Association for the Advancement of Science. (B) Bilayer hydrogel sheet-type intraocular microrobots. (Kim et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (C) Leukocyte-inspired multifunctional microrollers. (Alapan et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from American Association for the Advancement of Science. (D) Sequential magneto-actuated and optics-triggered biomicrorobots. (Xing et al., 2021) Copyright 2021. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (E) Photosynthetic biohybrid nanoswimmers. (Zhong et al., 2020) Copyright 2021. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons.
FIGURE 8Motile drug delivery by light-driven MNRs. (A) Platinum nanoparticle (Pt NP)-modified polymer multilayer micromotors. (Wu et al., 2014) Copyright 2014. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (B) Macrophage cell membrane (MPCM)-camouflaged Janus mesoporous silica nanomotor (JMSNM). (Xuan et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (C) Platelet-derived porous nanomotors. (Wan et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. (D) Photothermally-driven polymersome nanomotors. (Shao et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Chemical Society. (E) Membrane-cloaked Janus polymeric motors. (Shao et al., 2020) Copyright 2020. The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee John Wiley and Sons. (F) Janus calcium carbonate particle micromotors (JCPMs). (Zhou et al., 2021) Copyright 2021. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier Inc. (G) Photoelectrochemical TiO2-Au-nanowire-based motor. (Chen et al., 2021) Copyright 2021. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons.
Biohybrid MNRs for motile-targeting drug delivery.
| Energy sources | Representative examples | Experimental environment | Motion behavior | Loaded cargo/therapeutic drugs | Biomedical application | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Living cells | Sperm hybrid micromotors |
| Average speed: 41 ± 10 μm/s | DOX hydrochloride | Drug delivery (e.g., cancer, diseases in the female reproductive system) |
| |
| SHC hybrid sperm micromotors |
| Average speed: 76 ± 17 μm/s in blood | Heparin | Diseases in the circulatory system (e.g., blood clot) |
| ||
| Human-sperm-based hybrid micromotors |
| N.A. | DOX and CPT | Gynecologic diseases (e.g., cervical cancer, ovarian cancer) |
| ||
| Neutrobots |
| Maximum speed: 16.4 μm/s | Paclitaxel | Drug delivery |
| ||
|
| |||||||
| Micro-organisms | Microalga | Microalga-powered biohybrid microswimmers |
| Average speed: 156.13 ± 9.66 μm/s | FITC labeled dextran | Drug delivery |
|
|
| Soft erythrocyte-based bacterial microswimmers |
| Average speed: 10.2 ± 3.5 μm/s | DOX and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle | Drug delivery |
| |
| TDNPP-coated |
| N.A. | TDNPPs | Photodynamic cancer therapy Intracellular cargo (e.g., protein) delivery |
| ||
| Engineered probiotics |
| N.A. | PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antagonists | Immunotherapy |
| ||
|
| |||||||
| Magnetic-sensing |
| Average speed: 5µm/min ±2 μm/min | N.A. | Potential for drug delivery |
| ||
FIGURE 9Motile drug delivery by biohybrid MNRs. (A) Sperm hybrid micromotors. (Xu et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (B) Streamlined-horned cap (SHC) hybrid sperm micromotors. (Xu et al., 2020a) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society. (C) Human-sperm based hybrid micromotors. (Xu et al., 2020b) Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Soft erythrocyte-based bacterial microswimmers. (Alapan et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from American Association for the Advancement of Science. (E) Microalga-powered biohybrid microswimmers. (Yasa et al., 2018) Copyright 2018. Reproduced with permission from John Wiley and Sons. (F) Poly-ethylenimine aggregation-induced emission photosensitizer nanoparticles (TDNPP)-coated E. coli. (Wu M et al., 2019) Copyright 2019. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society.