| Literature DB >> 36185429 |
Jin Xu1,2, Mubasher Hussain3, Wenfeng Su1,2, Qian Yao1,2, Guandong Yang4, Yu Zhong4, Lin Zhou4, Xiaoting Huang5, Zhixiang Wang6, Quliang Gu1,2, Yifei Ren7, He Li1,2.
Abstract
Vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) is a plant resource with good nutritional and medicinal, and is widely consumed in China. This study aimed to develop a functional vine tea fermentation broth using microbial fermentation and cellulase degradation. First, the most suitable probiotics for vine tea fermentation were screened, and the fermentation conditions were optimized. Then, a new cellulase (Cel 906, MW076177) was added to evaluate the changes in the contents of effective substances and to study its efficacy. The results show that saccharomyces cerevisiae Y-401 was identified as the best strain, the optimal fermentation conditions were a time of 94.60 h, feeding concentration of 115.21 g/L, and temperature of about 34.97°C. The vine tea fermentation broth has a strong inhibitory ability on 2,2'-azinobis3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) (99.73%), peroxyl (53.15%), superoxide anion radicals (84.13%), and 1,1-Diphenyl-2-trinitrophenylhydrazine (DPPH) (92.48%). It has a decent inhibitory impact on the cell viability, tyrosinase activity (32.25%), and melanin synthesis (63.52%) of B16-F10 melanoma cells induced by α-MSH. Inflammatory cell recruitment was reduced in a zebrafish inflammation model. Therefore, this vine tea fermented broth has strong antioxidant, anti-melanoma, and anti-inflammatory effects, and has healthcare potential as a probiotic tea.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammatory; antioxidant; fermentation; vine tea; yeast; zebrafish
Year: 2022 PMID: 36185429 PMCID: PMC9521311 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1006316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Screening most suitable strains for vine tea fermentation. (A) DPPH clearance rate, (B) Standard curve of rutin (within 95% CI) (C) Flavonoid content, (D) Standard curve of gallic acid (within 95% CI) (E) Polyphenol content, (F) standard curve of glucose (within 95%CI) (G) Polysaccharide content. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus Control group).
FIGURE 2Optimization of fermentation conditions. (A) Fermentation time, (B) temperature (C) strain inoculation amount, (D) concentration (E) glucose addition, (F) urea addition (G) pH. And response surface and contour plots of the interactive effects of (H) fermentation time and concentration (I) fermentation time and temperature and (J) temperature and concentration.
FIGURE 3Extraction rate of effective substances. (A) Flavonoids, (B) polyphenols and (C) polysaccharides. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
FIGURE 4Inhibition of melanin production experiments. (A) Statistical chart of DPPH, ABTS, OH-, O2- free radical scavenging ability, (B) B16-F10 melanoma cell viability (C) Tyrosinase inhibition rate, (D) melanin synthesis inhibition rate (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs Control group. ###p < 0.001 vs 100 ug/mL Vc group).
FIGURE 5Anti-inflammatory effect of vine tea fermented broth, the scale in the figure is 200 μm. (A) Distribution of inflammatory cells in the tail of zebrafish larvae induced by tail cutting. (B) Number of cells recruited in the caudal (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. Control group).