Fengxia Zeng1, Hui Dai2,3, Xu Li4, Le Guo1, Ningyang Jia5, Jun Yang1, Danping Huang1, Hui Zeng1, Weiguo Chen1, Ling Zhang1, Genggeng Qin1,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Hospital Office, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, China. 3. Hospital Office, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Ganzhou, China. 4. School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 5. Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. 6. Department of Radiology, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Abstract
Objective: To compare and evaluate radiomics models to preoperatively predict β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Ninety-eight patients who underwent preoperative gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. Volumes of interest were manually delineated on arterial phase, portal venous phase, delay phase, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Radiomics features extracted from different combinations of imaging phases were analyzed and validated. A linear support vector classifier was applied to develop different models. Results: Among all 15 types of radiomics models, the model with the best performance was seen in the RHBP radiomics model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of the RHBP radiomics model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.93), 0.75, 1.0, and 0.65 and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-0.93), 0.73, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively. The combined model integrated radiomics features in the RHBP radiomics model, and signatures in the clinical model did not improve further compared to the single HBP radiomics model with AUCs of 0.86 and 0.76. Good calibration for the best RHBP radiomics model was displayed in both cohorts; the decision curve showed that the net benefit could achieve 0.15. The most important radiomics features were low and high gray-level zone emphases based on gray-level size zone matrix with the same Shapley additive explanation values of 0.424. Conclusion: The RHBP radiomics model may be used as an effective model indicative of HCCs with β-catenin mutation preoperatively and thus could guide personalized medicine.
Objective: To compare and evaluate radiomics models to preoperatively predict β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Ninety-eight patients who underwent preoperative gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. Volumes of interest were manually delineated on arterial phase, portal venous phase, delay phase, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Radiomics features extracted from different combinations of imaging phases were analyzed and validated. A linear support vector classifier was applied to develop different models. Results: Among all 15 types of radiomics models, the model with the best performance was seen in the RHBP radiomics model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of the RHBP radiomics model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.93), 0.75, 1.0, and 0.65 and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-0.93), 0.73, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively. The combined model integrated radiomics features in the RHBP radiomics model, and signatures in the clinical model did not improve further compared to the single HBP radiomics model with AUCs of 0.86 and 0.76. Good calibration for the best RHBP radiomics model was displayed in both cohorts; the decision curve showed that the net benefit could achieve 0.15. The most important radiomics features were low and high gray-level zone emphases based on gray-level size zone matrix with the same Shapley additive explanation values of 0.424. Conclusion: The RHBP radiomics model may be used as an effective model indicative of HCCs with β-catenin mutation preoperatively and thus could guide personalized medicine.
Authors: Y Miyoshi; K Iwao; Y Nagasawa; T Aihara; Y Sasaki; S Imaoka; M Murata; T Shimano; Y Nakamura Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Marc S Ernstoff; Shipra Gandhi; Manu Pandey; Igor Puzanov; Petros Grivas; Alberto Montero; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Mary Jo Turk; Claudia Marcela Diaz-Montero; Lionel D Lewis; Carl Morrison Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Barbara Dal Bello; Laura Rosa; Nicoletta Campanini; Carmine Tinelli; Francesca Torello Viera; Gioacchino D'Ambrosio; Sandro Rossi; Enrico M Silini Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Patrick A Ott; F Stephen Hodi; Howard L Kaufman; Jon M Wigginton; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 13.751