| Literature DB >> 36185157 |
William Grigg1, Faisal Mahfooz1, Dharmista Chaudhary1, Isain Zapata2, Douglas Duffee1,3.
Abstract
The use of glycosylated hemoglobin as a diabetic glycemic control and cardiovascular risk marker is well documented. It has also been suggested as a marker for early diastolic hemodynamic changes leading to clinical heart failure, but is less well characterized. This study explored the association between elevated glycosylated hemoglobin and liver Fibrosis-4 values and worsening measures of diastolic cardiac function in order to assess their potential as early serologic markers in cardiovascular disease prevention. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in 102 patients presenting to the Parkview Medical Center health system who had received a full resting echo characterized by normal systolic ejection fraction and clinical risk factors associated with stage A heart failure in conjunction with glycosylated hemoglobin and Fibrosis-4 scores within a 3-month time window. Using regression analysis, measures of diastolic cardiac function were assessed in conjunction with rising glycosylated hemoglobin levels characterized as <6.5 and >6.5 and Fibrosis-4 scores after controlling for the presence of hypertension, coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels >6.5 were significantly associated with a higher E/e' ratio and closely associated with an elevated left atrial volume index both indicative of elevated left atrial pressure as a sensitive marker for diastolic cardiac dysfunction. Fibrosis-4 scores did not appear to be clinically associated with progression of diastolic dysfunction. Thus, glycosylated hemoglobin may act as an early marker for identifying patients at increased risk for the progression of stage A heart failure. Fibrosis-4 scores do not appear to be related.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 36185157 PMCID: PMC9491392 DOI: 10.21542/gcsp.2021.25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Cardiol Sci Pract ISSN: 2305-7823
Descriptive statistics continuous parameters evaluated in the study cohort.
|
|
Descriptive statistics of categorical parameters evaluated in the study cohort.
|
|
Notes.
CAD regional wall motion abnormalities
Figure 1.Risk ratio parameter estimates of Glyco% and FIB-4 models.
Sex (M/F) and comorbidities (Yes/No) were defined as parametric responses while age, BMI, BNP, LAVI and E/e’ were defined as spline smoothing components. Significantly associated effects (P < 0.05) are marked by an asterisk (*).
Figure 2.Spline smoothing component evaluation of deviance for linearly defined parameters in the generalized additive models.
Curve-wise confidence band is at 95% confidence level. P values presented are for the analysis of deviance of each spline smoothing component where significant deviance is declared at P < 0.05.
Low group vs high group parameter estimates.
“Low group” being defined as having Glyco% 6.5 or less while the “high group” being defined as having Glyco% over 6.5. Groupings were evaluated independently for each Glyco% and FIB-4. Sex (M/F) and comorbidities (Yes/No) were defined as parametric responses while age, BMI,BNP, LAVI and E/e’ were defined as spline smoothing components. Significantly associated effects (P < 0.05) are marked by an asterisk (*).
|
|
Notes.
CAD regional wall motion abnormalities