| Literature DB >> 36185092 |
Shunlian Fu1, Lisha Sun1, Yiding Chen1, Qian Zhou1, Lijun Yuan1, Zinan Li1, Qiu Chen1.
Abstract
Background: Due to the limited treatment options in antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in children, more effective treatments should be explored. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has a long history in China, which has produced a pretty effect in clinical practice. Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have explored the effect of traditional Chinese medicine on treating AAD in children. However, there has been no systematic review or meta-analysis on the impact of TCM on AAD in children. The aim of this study was to systematically review RCTs on the effect of TCM in children with AAD.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36185092 PMCID: PMC9522518 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6108772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Search terms.
| #1 | “traditional Chinese medicine” or “Chinese patent medicine” |
| #2 | “Chinese herbal compound prescription” or “TCM” or “Chinese medicinal herb” or “Chinese herbal medicine” |
| #3 | #1 or #2 |
| #4 | “Chinese” |
| #5 | “formula” or “decoction” or “drug” or “prescription” or “medicine” |
| #6 | #4 AND #5 |
| #7 | #3 or #6 |
| #8 | “controlled clinical trial” or “random∗” or “randomized controlled trial” or “RCT” or “trial” |
| #9 | “antibiotic-associated diarrhea” |
| #10 | #7 AND #8 AND #9 |
Figure 1PRISMA flow diagram of the study-selection process.
Summary of included studies.
| Author, year | Sample size | Interventions | Control | Treatment course | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCM | CG | |||||
| Zhu Hong, 2020 | 43 | 42 | Shenling Baizhu granule + | a | 2 weeks | ①④ |
| Yao Na, 2019 | 42 | 42 | Shenling Baizhu granule + | a | 5 days | ①②⑤⑥ |
| Wang Fuhai, 2020 | 38 | 38 | Shenling Baizhu granule + | a | 5 days | ②③④⑤⑦⑧ |
| Luo Linlin, 2014 | 60 | 60 | Shenling Baizhu granule + | a | 5 days | ①②⑥ |
| Shou-Xin Wang, 2020 | 60 | 60 | Xingpi Yanger granule + | a | 7 days | ①②⑤⑪ |
| Tian Tian, 2018 | 85 | 80 | Xingpi Yanger granule + | a | 5-7 days | ①②③⑧⑫⑬ |
| Huijuan Qi, 2020 | 42 | 42 | Xingpi Yanger granule + | a | 5 days | ①⑤⑨⑪⑫ |
| LinJian Ying, 2019 | 53 | 53 | Xingpi Yanger granule + | a | 3 days | ① |
| Rong Li, 2020 | 25 | 25 | Xingpi Yanger granule + | a | 3∼5 days | ①②⑫⑬ |
| Liu Huijin, 2017 | 48 | 48 | Xingpi Yanger granule + | a | 7 days | ①②⑧ |
| Zhang Minzhen, 2018 | 39 | 39 | Jianpi Bushen decoction + | a | 7 days | ①②③ |
| Fan Zhang, 2021 | 49 | 41 | Erxieting granules + | a | 72 h | ①②③⑤⑨ |
| Cao fang, 2016 | 100 | 60 | Erxieting granules + | a | 72 h | ① |
| Yuan Chaogang, 2022 | 60 | 60 | Huangqi Jianzhong decoction + | a | 6 days | ①②⑤ |
| Yang Liping, 2016 | 50 | 50 | Weichangan pill + | a | 7 days | ①②③⑮ |
| Guo Xinning, 2016 | 58 | 50 | Weichangan pill + | a | 7 days | ①② |
| Ma Jingyan, 2017 | 51 | 52 | Weichangan pill + | a | 7 days | ① |
| Chun-Ling Yang, 2017 | 35 | 35 | Jianpi Bushen decoction + | a | 72 h | ①② |
| Yong-jun xu, 2015 | 84 | 58 | Sijunzi decoction + | a | 5–10 days | ①② |
| Tu Xufei, 2020 | 54 | 54 | Modified Yigong powder + | a | 7 days | ①⑤③ |
| RuanXiaoDong, 2019 | 57 | 57 | Xiaoer Fuxie powder + | a | 2 weeks | ①②⑬⑨⑩ |
| Bai jin, 2017 | 56 | 56 | Xiaoer Fuxie powder + | a | 2 weeks | ①②⑬⑨⑩ |
| Li-fang cao, 2017 | 43 | 43 | Yiersan + | a | 5 days | ① |
| Ma Xiaopeng, 2016 | 60 | 60 | Guben Yichang tablets + | a | 2 weeks | ①②④⑦⑬⑨ |
| Fan Jiayu, 2021 | 25 | 25 | Buzhong Yiqi particles+ | a | 1 week | ① |
| Li-fang cao, 2015 | 45 | 44 | Qiweibaizhu powder+ | a | 10 days | ① |
a: conventional therapy: antidiarrheal, fluid, diet adjustment, correct electrolyte imbalance, probiotics, montmorillonite powder, and so on; CG: control group. ①total effective rate; ②Antidiarrheal time; ③Diarrhea frequency; ④T cell subset: CD3+, CD4 +, CD8 +, CD4 +/CD8 +; ⑤The time to change the shape of feces; ⑥Time for bowel sounds to return to normal; ⑦Immune indice: CD3+, CD4+, IgA, IgG, IgM; ⑧intestinal barrier function: bacterial endotoxin(BT), diamine oxidase(DAO), D-Lactic acid(D-LC); ⑨Vomiting improvement time; ⑩Inflammatory factors: hs-CRP, IL8, IL-12, and TNF-α; ⑪Gastrointestinal hormones: gastrin(GAS), motilin(MOT), somatostatin(SS); ⑫Average hospital stay; ⑬Normal temperature time.
Figure 2Risk of bias graph.
Figure 3Risk of bias summary.
Figure 4Effect of TCM combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy on the total effective rate.
Figure 5The funnel plot of TCM combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy on the total effective rate.
Figure 6Effect of TCM combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy on the time to change the shape of feces.
Figure 7Effect of TCM combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy on antidiarrheal time.
Figure 8The funnel plot of TCM combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy on antidiarrheal time.
Effect of TCM combined with conventional therapy on other indices.
| Outcome or Subgroup | Studies | Participants | Effect Estimate(Mean Difference, 95% CI) | Heterogeneity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency of diarrhea on the third day after TCM intervention | 5 | 509 | −1.18 [−1.77, −0.58] | 96% |
| The change of CD3+ | 2 | 205 | 6.40 [−8.77, 21.57] | 0% |
| Time for bowel sounds to return to normal | 2 | 204 | −6.65 [−17.27, 3.96] | 97% |
| The change of CD4+ | 3 | 281 | 5.99 [−2.42, 14.41] | 0% |
| The change of CD8+ | −1.86 [−7.90, 4.18] | 0% | ||
| The change of CD4 : CD8 | 0.19 [−0.12, 0.49] | 0% | ||
| Effect of vomiting improvement time | 3 | 346 | −1.14 [−1.64, −0.64] | 86% |
| The change of diamine oxidase | 2 | 241 | −3.69 [−6.45, −0.92] | 0% |
| IgA | 2 | 196 | 0.56 [0.02, 1.10] | 0% |
| IgG | 2 | 196 | 3.49 [0.69, 6.29] | 0% |
| IgM | 2 | 196 | 0.38 [−0.07, 0.83] | 0% |
| Average hospital stay | 3 | 299 | −1.31 [−2.11, −0.51] | 88% |
| Hs-CRP | 2 | 226 | −0.28 [−0.89, 0.34] | 0% |
| IL-8 | −1.16 [−2.07, −0.26] | 0% | ||
| TNF | −0.83 [−1.12, −0.54] | 0% |