| Literature DB >> 36185053 |
Yan-Rong Yang1, Wen-Wu Ling1, Shu-Hua Shi1, Yong-Zhong Li1, Jiao-Jiao Zhou1.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36185053 PMCID: PMC9511433 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg ISSN: 2223-4306
Diagnostic criteria for posterior nutcracker phenomenon in the Department of Ultrasound of West China Hospital
| 1. Retroaortic left renal vein |
| 2. D-VD/S-VD >3:1 in the supine position or >4:1 in the spinal extension position |
| 3. S-PSV/D-PSV >3:1 in the supine position or >4:1 in the spinal extension position |
Patients meeting criteria 1 and 2 and/or 3 are diagnosed as posterior nutcracker phenomenon. D-VD, diameter of the dilated part of the vessel; S-VD, diameter of the stenotic part of the vessel; S-PSV, peak systolic flow velocity in the stenotic part of the vessel; D-PSV, peak systolic flow velocity in the dilated part.
Summary of clinical features and follow-up information of patients with posterior nutcracker syndrome (n=8)
| Case No. | Age (years) | Sex | Scrotal fall-swell | Flank pain | Pelvic congestion | Hematuria | No. erythrocytes/HPF | Proteinuria | Examination time | Duration of follow-up (years) | Ultrasound machine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | M | No | No | No | Yes | 17 | No | 2017 | 4 | iU22 (Philips) |
| 2 | 39 | F | No | No | No | Yes | 70 | No | 2018 | 3 | iU22 (Philips) |
| 3 | 31 | M | No | No | No | Yes | 388 | Yes | 2018 | 3 | iU22 (Philips) |
| 4 | 48 | F | No | No | No | Yes | 23 | No | 2019 | 2 | iU22 (Philips) |
| 5 | 34 | F | No | No | No | Yes | 19 | Yes | 2021 | 1 | iU22 (Philips) |
| 6 | 29 | M | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 33 | No | 2018 | 3 | iU22 (Philips) |
| 7 | 31 | F | No | No | No | Yes | 2235 | Yes | 2020 | 1 | iU22 (Philips)/GE Logiq E9 |
| 8 | 44 | M | Yes | No | No | Yes | 21 | No | 2021 | 1 | iU22 (Philips) |
HPF, high-power field; M, male; F, female.
Figure 1Typical ultrasound images from a 34-year-old woman (case 5). (A) Gray-scale and (B) color Doppler sonograms of a retroaortic LRV. (C,D) Peak systolic flow velocity of the distal (C) and stenotic (D) LRV (13.7 and 116 cm/s, respectively). AO, abdominal aorta; SP, spine; LRV, left renal vein.
Figure 2Ultrasound and enhanced CT images from a 29-year-old man (case 6). (A) Gray-scale and (B) color Doppler sonograms of the LRV. (C) Sagittal reconstruction image of the LRV. (D-F) Arterial phase enhanced computed tomography images of the LRV. AO, abdominal aorta; SP, spine; LRV, left renal vein.
Figure 3Circumaortic LRV of a 31-year-old woman (case 7) in different planes. (A) Gray-scale and (B) color Doppler sonograms of the LRV with an anterior aortic course. (C) CT vein reconstruction of the A-LRV. (D) Gray-scale and (E) color Doppler sonograms of the LRV with a retroaortic course. (F) CT vein reconstruction of P-LRV. SMA, superior mesenteric artery; LRV, left renal vein; AO, abdominal aorta; SP, spine; CT, computed tomography; A-LRV, anterior LRV.
Ultrasound information for all the patients (n=8)
| Case No. | S-VD (cm) | D-VD (cm) | D-VD/S-VD | S-PSV (cm/s) | D-PSV (cm/s) | S-PSV/D-PSV | Angle between AO and SMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.14 | 0.7 | 5 | 90.4 | 27.6 | 3.3 | N/A |
| 2 | 0.22 | 1.10 | 5 | 116.0 | 15.5 | 7.5 | N/A |
| 3 | 0.11 | 0.70 | 6.4 | 62.7 | 15.8 | 4.0 | 34.7º |
| 4 | 0.26 | 1.00 | 3.8 | 67.4 | 20.2 | 3.3 | N/A |
| 5 | 0.18 | 1.02 | 5.7 | 45.8 | 11.8 | 3.9 | 17.5º |
| 6 | 0.25 | 0.78 | 3.1 | 40.0 | 12.5 | 3.2 | N/A |
| 7a | 0.21 | 0.73 | 3.5 | 85.0 | 12.9 | 6.6 | 19º |
| 7p | 0.16 | 0.85 | 5.3 | 105.0 | 29.5 | 3.6 | N/A |
| 8 | 0.15 | 0.75 | 5 | 65.2 | 16.1 | 4.0 | 12.9º |
7a, anterior left renal vein; 7p, posterior left renal vein. S-VD, diameter of the stenotic part of the vessel; D-VD, diameter of the dilated part of the vessel; S-PSV, peak systolic flow velocity in the stenotic part of the vessel; D-PSV, peak systolic flow velocity in the dilated part of the vessel; AO, abdominal aorta; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; N/A, not available.