Aleksandra Matuszewska-Iwanicka1, Bernd Stratmann2, Oliver Stachs3, Stephan Allgeier4, Andreas Bartschat4, Karsten Winter5, Rudolf Guthoff3, Diethelm Tschoepe2,6, Hans-Joachim Hettlich7. 1. Eye Clinic Johannes Wesling Hospital, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Augen-Praxisklinik Minden, Königstraße 120, 32427, Minden, Germany. aleksandra.matuszewska@gmail.com. 2. Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Diabeteszentrum, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. 4. Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany. 5. Institute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 6. Stiftung DHD (Der herzkranke Diabetiker) Stiftung in der Deutschen Diabetes-Stiftung, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. 7. Eye Clinic Johannes Wesling Hospital, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Augen-Praxisklinik Minden, Königstraße 120, 32427, Minden, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the corneal nerve fibre plexus with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is an upcoming but still experimental method in the diagnosis of early stage diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Using an innovative imaging technique-Heidelberg Retina Tomograph equipped with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT-RCM) and EyeGuidance module (EG)-we were able to look at greater areas of subbasal nerve plexus (SNP) in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of EG instead of single image analysis in diagnosis of early stage DPN. METHODS: This prospective study was performed on 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, classified equally into two subgroups based on neuropathy deficient score (NDS): patients without DPN (group 1) or with mild DPN (group 2). The following parameters were analysed in the two subgroups: corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL; mm/mm2), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD; no./mm2), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD; no./mm2). Furthermore, we compared the data calculated with the novel mosaic, EG-based method with those received from single image analysis using different quantification tools. RESULTS: Using EG we did not find a significant difference between group 1 and group 2: CNFL (16.81 ± 5.87 mm/mm2 vs. 17.19 ± 7.19 mm/mm2, p = 0.895), CNFD (254.05 ± 115.36 no./mm2 vs. 265.91 ± 161.63 no./mm2, p = 0.732) and CNBD (102.68 ± 62.28 no./mm2 vs. 115.38 ± 96.91 no./mm2, p = 0.541). No significant difference between the EG method of analysing the SNP and the single image analysis of 10 images per patient was detected. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our results it was not possible to differentiate between early stages of large nerve fibre DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus via SNP analysis. To improve sensitivity and specificity of this method newer technologies are under current evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05326958.
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the corneal nerve fibre plexus with corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is an upcoming but still experimental method in the diagnosis of early stage diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Using an innovative imaging technique-Heidelberg Retina Tomograph equipped with the Rostock Cornea Module (HRT-RCM) and EyeGuidance module (EG)-we were able to look at greater areas of subbasal nerve plexus (SNP) in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of EG instead of single image analysis in diagnosis of early stage DPN. METHODS: This prospective study was performed on 60 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, classified equally into two subgroups based on neuropathy deficient score (NDS): patients without DPN (group 1) or with mild DPN (group 2). The following parameters were analysed in the two subgroups: corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL; mm/mm2), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD; no./mm2), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD; no./mm2). Furthermore, we compared the data calculated with the novel mosaic, EG-based method with those received from single image analysis using different quantification tools. RESULTS: Using EG we did not find a significant difference between group 1 and group 2: CNFL (16.81 ± 5.87 mm/mm2 vs. 17.19 ± 7.19 mm/mm2, p = 0.895), CNFD (254.05 ± 115.36 no./mm2 vs. 265.91 ± 161.63 no./mm2, p = 0.732) and CNBD (102.68 ± 62.28 no./mm2 vs. 115.38 ± 96.91 no./mm2, p = 0.541). No significant difference between the EG method of analysing the SNP and the single image analysis of 10 images per patient was detected. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our results it was not possible to differentiate between early stages of large nerve fibre DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus via SNP analysis. To improve sensitivity and specificity of this method newer technologies are under current evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05326958.
Authors: Andrew J M Boulton; Arthur I Vinik; Joseph C Arezzo; Vera Bril; Eva L Feldman; Roy Freeman; Rayaz A Malik; Raelene E Maser; Jay M Sosenko; Dan Ziegler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: S Tesfaye; L Vileikyte; G Rayman; S H Sindrup; B A Perkins; M Baconja; A I Vinik; A J M Boulton Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: B Köhler; S Allgeier; A Bartschat; R F Guthoff; S Bohn; K-M Reichert; O Stachs; K Winter; R Mikut Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.059