| Literature DB >> 36182982 |
Daoming Chen1, Zijian Xu1, Jun Cui1, Ting Chen2,3.
Abstract
Vitiligo is the most common human skin depigmenting disorder. It is mediated by endogenous autoreactive CD8 + T cells that destruct skin melanocytes. This disease has an estimated prevalence of 1% of the global population and currently has no cure. Animal models are indispensable tools for understanding vitiligo pathogenesis and for developing new therapies. Here, we describe a vitiligo mouse model which recapitulates key clinical features of vitiligo, including epidermis depigmentation, CD8 + T cell infiltration in skin, and melanocyte loss. To activate endogenous autoreactive cytotoxic CD8 + T cells targeting melanocytes, this model relies on transient inoculation of B16F10 melanoma cells and depletion of CD4 + regulatory T cells. At cellular level, epidermal CD8 + T cell infiltration and melanocyte loss start as early as Day 19 after treatment. Visually apparent epidermis depigmentation occurs 2 months later. This protocol can efficiently induce vitiligo in any C57BL/6 background mouse strain, using only commercially available reagents. This enables researchers to carry out in-depth in vivo vitiligo studies utilizing mouse genetics tools, and provides a powerful platform for drug discovery.Entities:
Keywords: Activation; Endogenous autoreactive cytotoxic CD8 + T cells; Mouse model; Vitiligo
Year: 2022 PMID: 36182982 PMCID: PMC9526765 DOI: 10.1186/s13619-022-00132-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Regen ISSN: 2045-9769
Fig. 1Schema for vitiligo mouse model induction. a Schematic diagram of the induction procedure for vitiligo mouse model. b Experimental procedure to evaluate the depletion efficiency of anti-CD4 depletion antibody. Two doses of anti-mouse CD4 depletion antibody were injected intraperitoneally, at 10 μg/g body weight (~ 200 μg) per animal per day. (c-d) Representative FACS profiles and quantification of CD3 + CD4 + T cells in spleen c, and tail skin epidermis d, of mice that were either untreated (Ctl) or treated with anti-CD4 depletion antibody. Cells were pre-gated on CD45 + live singlets. e Representative FACS profiles and quantification of CD4 + Foxp3 + Tregs in skin draining lymph node with or without anti-CD4 depletion antibody treatment. Cells were pre-gated on CD45 + CD3 + live singlets. f Representative images to illustrate the color of cell pellets of B16F10 cells under different culture conditions. g Representative brightfield images in a petri dish and cell counts of B16F10 cells that will yield cell pellets with different colors. h The tumorigenesis capacity of B16F10 cells with different colors of pellets. The tumor size was measured at Day 12 post B16F10 inoculation. i Quantifications represent the percentage of vitiligo developed (determined by marked melanocyte loss and CD8 + T cell infiltration at Day 33) with different tumor size at Day 12 post B16F10 inoculation. n = 10 (0–0.02 cm3), 9 (0.02–0.05 cm3), 6 (0.05–0.1 cm3), 8 (0.1–0.15 cm3), 5 (0.15–0.2 cm3), and 6 (> 0.2 cm3). j Photographs of injection area at Day 0, 4, and 12 of B16F10 intradermal injection. A small bubble will appear underneath the skin after the injection procedure. The tumor size is 2–4 mm on Day 4 and 5–15 mm on Day 12 in diameter. k Representative images of dorsal hair coat on Day 60 and tail on Day 120 after the vitiligo induction
Fig. 2FACS to evaluate vitiligo induction efficiency. a Schematic diagram of the protocol for FACS analysis of CD3 + CD8 + T cells in tail skin epidermis. b-c Representative FACS profiles and quantification of CD3 + CD8 + T cells (pre-gated on CD45 + live singlets) on Day 33 after vitiligo induction. d Schematic diagram of the protocol for FACS analysis of CD117 + melanocytes in tail skin epidermis. e–f Representative FACS profiles and quantification of CD117 + melanocytes (pre-gated on live singlets) on Day 33 after vitiligo induction
Fig. 3Whole-mount immunofluorescence staining to evaluate vitiligo induction efficiency. a Schematic diagram of the protocol for whole-mount immunofluorescent staining to detect melanocytes and CD8 + T cells in tail skin epidermis. b Representative whole-mount immunofluorescent images of epidermis separated by 20 mM EDTA or 1 × dispase. Scale bars, 100 µm. c Representative whole-mount immunofluorescent images, converted digital spots, scatter plots, and smoothed density plots showing the distribution pattern of melanocytes and CD8 + T cells on Day 33 after vitiligo induction. Scale bars, 500 µm. d Top: Representative whole-mount immunofluorescent images of melanocytes and CD8 + T cells on Day 19, 26, and 33 after vitiligo induction. Bottom: Scatter plots showing the distribution pattern of CD8 + T cells on the indicating time. Scale bars, 500 µm. e Quantification of T cell cluster size on Day 19, 26, and 33 after vitiligo induction. n = 8, 9, 7 mice for Day 19, 26, and 33, respectively
Fig. 4Lentivirus-mediated shRNA knockdown in skin dermal fibroblasts. a Schematic diagram of lentivirus-mediated shRNA knockdown in the skin dermal fibroblasts. b Representative image of lentivirus-injected area in skin section. Lentivirus infected cells are marked in red by lentivirus expressed H2B-RFP. Scale bar, 50 µm. c-d Whole-mount analysis of distribution pattern of dermal CD8 + T cells and infected fibroblasts (c), and epidermal CD8 + T cells and melanocytes (d) post Stat1-shRNA-containing lentiviruses injection and vitiligo induction. Black dotted line frames indicate the scale region of the tail epidermis. Scale bars, 500 µm
| Step | Problem | Possible reason(s) | Possible solution(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | The B16F10 pellet turns black | B16F10 cells approach more than 80% confluence before subculturing | Do not use this dish of cells and thaw a new vial |
| 21 | Difficulty in piercing the needle into the skin during B16F10 injection | The needle is blunt | Change to a new syringe after injecting 3 mice |
| 21 | Excessive leakage of B16F10 suspension from the injection site (> 1/3) | The hair cycle enters anagen and the skin thickens | Do not use such mice; use 8–9-week-old female mice with telogen skin |
| 21 | After injection, the emerged small bubble does not move with the skin when the skin is gently tugged | The needle is inserted subcutaneously or into the muscle layer | 1. Insert the needle at an angle parallel to the skin surface (5–15°). Bending the needle slightly will help 2. Decrease the insertion depth of the needle |
| 22 | No tumor is detected on Day 4 | 1. B16F10 cells approach more than 80% confluence or turn black 2. The counts of B16F10 cells have not been correctly counted or calculated 3. The viability of B16F10 cells decreases after being kept on ice for more than 1 h 4. The viability of B16F10 cells can decrease upon transporting with a -20˚C ice pack | 1. Ensure the B16F10 cells are in optimal status before use (< 80% confluence, and white-to-gray in color) 2. Determine the viable and total cell counts with an automated cell counter. Gently pipette to mix the cell suspensions before loading them onto the chip of a cell counter 3. Complete the B16F10 injection step within 1 h. Keep the cell suspension on ice before injection 4. Transport the B16F10 cells with ice |
| 27 | The diameter of the tumor is less than 5 mm on Day 12 | B16F10 cells are heterogeneous in nature and previous publications have widely reported variable tumor growth after engraftment. Based on our experience, tumor with diameter less than 2 mm at Day 4, will not grow up to have diameter exceeding 5 mm on Day 12 | 1. We recommend that researchers prepare 10 female mice per group to ensure that at least 5 replicates will be obtained 2. Do not use mice with tumors smaller than 2 mm on Day 4 |
| 28 | High incidence of death after tumor removal | 1. The mice housing condition is not optimal 2. The suture clip on the wound is so loose that it fell off after operation 3. The tumor is so large that the wound is too large after the operation | 1. Mice should be maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility with clean caging 2. Carefully affix the suture clip to sure closure 3. Strictly control the number of injected cells to less than 2 × 105 |
| 33 | Low yield of cells after enzyme and mechanical digestion | 1. Dispase digestion or Trypsin/TrypLE digestion is not efficient 2. Mechanical digestion is not enough | 1. Ensure enzyme solutions are freshly made. Dispase should be prepared on the day of use 2. Increase digestion time by 1–2 min 3. Make sure to repeatedly pipette the epidermis piece 20 times. An increase to 30 times may help |
| 34 | Cell viability was lower than 50% in FACS analysis | 1. Excessive time for cell suspension preparation 2. Low yield of cells after enzyme and mechanical digestion | 1. Complete the digestion and staining step within 3 h. If there are > 5 samples, we recommend having 2 people working together to minimize the digestion time 2. Refer to troubleshooting item 33 |
| 34 | No positive staining of CD8 + markers by flow cytometry | Dispase digestion time exceeded 1 h. Longer dispase digestion impairs CD8 antigen | Shorten the dispase digestion time |
| 34 | No vitiligo development (No CD8 + T infiltration or melanocyte loss) | 1. Storage condition of the CD4 depletion antibody may not be optimal to ensure preservation of antibody activity 2. The tumor is too large or too small on Day 12 3. The tumor was not completely removed on Day 12 | 1. Antibody should be stored at -80˚C and handled on ice. The CD4 + T cell depletion efficiency of the antibody should be determined by FACS if in question 2. Do not use mice with tumors less than 5 mm or larger than 15 mm 3. Make sure the tumor is completely removed |
| 50 | Difficulty in sealing the tissue using coverslip due to curling at the edge | The edges of the skin curl during transfer to the well or during fixation | Avoid any curling at the edge before and during PFA fixation Put epidermis in DPBS with the surface side facing up. Aspirate off DPBS and slowly add 1.5 mL 4% PFA to the well and then incubate |
| 51 | High background signal in immunofluorescence staining image | 1. The concentration of the antibody is too high 2. Insufficient washing 3. The penetration step was omitted (Methanol + 0.3% H2O2 in -20˚C) | 1. Titrate the optimal antibody concentration 2. Use more DPBS and a longer washing time 3. Make sure to conduct the penetration step |
| 51 | No or low immuno-fluorescence signal detected (poor resolution) | 1. Excess fixation time 2. Confocal microscope is not properly set up 3. The concentration of the antibody is too low 4. Inappropriate choice of antibody | 1. Optimize the fixation time. Long fixation time can cause antigen disruption 2. Ensure that microscope settings are properly adjusted 3. Titrate the optimal antibody concentration 4. Check the host species and isotype |
| 51 | Several skin regions have melanocyte loss but no T cell infiltration | Some mice have spontaneous white patches in their tail skin and may lack melanocytes due to developmental problems | Make sure that the tail tip is black when receiving mice from the supplier |
| 51 | Skin regions display CD8 + T cell infiltration but no melanocyte loss | Mice are too young or too old. The hair cycle of the dorsal skin is in anagen | Use 8–9-week-old female mice with telogen skin. When using genetically modified strains, use age-matched female controls |