| Literature DB >> 36181649 |
Wen Yang1, Ming Hui Li1, Jane Jie Yu2, Stephen Heung-Sang Wong1, Raymond Kim-Wai Sum1, Cindy Hui-Ping Sit3.
Abstract
To examine the associations between physical activity (PA) levels and mental health in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (IDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic, 117 participants aged between 6 and 17 years with IDs from 10 Hong Kong special schools were included. There were positive dose-response associations between PA (i.e., light PA, moderate PA, and vigorous PA) and mental health, and participants with higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and self-concept (SC) had better social quality of life (QoL) than those with lower levels of MVPA and SC. Moreover, personal and environmental factors such as age, body mass index, school, sex, ID level, and parental education level influenced the PA levels and QoL in children and adolescents with IDs.Entities:
Keywords: Quality of life; Self-concept; Special educational needs; Special schools; Youth
Year: 2022 PMID: 36181649 PMCID: PMC9526382 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05777-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Autism Dev Disord ISSN: 0162-3257
Fig. 1The hypothesized model between accelerometer-measured physical activity levels and mental health in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Note. Solid arrows denote significant association results; dotted arrows denote the mechanisms between physical activity, quality of life, and self-concept; dash-dotted arrows denote significant moderating effects of personal and environmental factors
Fig. 2ICF-CY framework showing relevant factors for studying the associations between physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities
Characteristics of participants and variables (N = 117)
| Variable | Dimension | Mean ± SD/N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Overall | 13.17 ± 3.82 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | Overall | 20.90 ± 5.10 |
| School | Overall | 10 (26.3%) |
| Sex | Male | 86 (73.5%) |
| Female | 31 (26.5%) | |
| ID level | Mild ID | 61 (52.1%) |
| Moderate ID | 56 (47.9%) | |
| Parental education level | < College/university | 75 (64.1%) |
| ≥ College/university | 42 (35.9%) | |
| Physical activity (min per day) | Light physical activity | 254.09 ± 78.42 |
| Moderate physical activity | 33.24 ± 25.24 | |
| Vigorous physical activity | 1.21 ± 1.61 | |
| Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity | 34.92 ± 26.00 | |
| Participants meeting MVPA guidelines | 16 (13.7%) | |
| Mental health | ||
| Quality of life (QoL), range 0–100 | Physical QoL | 74.52 ± 17.83 |
| Emotional QoL | 69.43 ± 15.26 | |
| Social QoL | 47.70 ± 23.90 | |
| School QoL | 58.15 ± 18.83 | |
| Psychosocial QoL | 58.50 ± 16.74 | |
| Total QoL | 64.43 ± 15.28 | |
| Self-concept (SC), range 1–6 | Physical activity SC | 3.90 ± 1.37 |
| Appearance SC | 4.47 ± 1.27 | |
| Global SC | 4.34 ± 1.29 | |
| Strength SC | 4.45 ± 1.15 | |
| Total SC | 4.30 ± 1.05 | |
Fig. 3The dose–response associations between physical activity and quality of life in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Note. Generalized linear model results were fully adjusted for personal, environmental, and health-related factors; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Fig. 4The dose–response associations between physical activity and self-concept in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Note. Generalized linear model results were fully adjusted for personal, environmental, and health-related factors; *p < 0.05
The interaction of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and self-concept in relation to quality of life
| Group 1 | Group 2 (n = 30) | Group 3 (n = 29) | Group 4 (n = 29) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 29) | MD | lower | upper | MD | lower | upper | MD | lower | upper | ||||
| Physical quality of life (QoL) | |||||||||||||
| Model 1 | Ref | 9.78 | 0.06 | − 0.23 | 19.79 | − 0.55 | 0.92 | − 10.79 | 9.69 | 7.04 | 0.18 | − 3.20 | 17.28 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 6.90 | 0.16 | − 2.81 | 16.60 | − 6.29 | 0.23 | − 16.50 | 3.93 | 2.89 | 0.61 | − 8.20 | 13.98 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 5.27 | 0.28 | − 4.32 | 14.87 | − 9.25 | 0.12 | − 20.89 | 2.39 | − 2.02 | 0.75 | − 14.28 | 10.23 |
| Emotional QoL | |||||||||||||
| Model 1 | Ref | 7.97 | 0.06 | − 0.26 | 16.20 | 0.71 | 0.87 | − 7.72 | 9.14 | 3.33 | 0.44 | − 5.10 | 11.76 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 7.71 | 0.06 | − 0.28 | 15.69 | − 1.02 | 0.81 | − 9.48 | 7.44 | 2.53 | 0.59 | − 6.65 | 11.71 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 7.13 | 0.08 | − 0.87 | 15.13 | 0.29 | 0.95 | − 9.51 | 10.10 | 4.82 | 0.35 | − 5.35 | 14.99 |
| Social QoL | |||||||||||||
| Model 1 | Ref | 6.53 | 0.34 | − 6.97 | 20.04 | − 0.82 | 0.91 | − 14.64 | 13.01 | 6.71 | 0.35 | − 7.30 | 20.72 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 8.79 | 0.18 | − 3.93 | 21.52 | 0.24 | 0.97 | − 13.24 | 13.73 | 16.32* | 1.52 | 31.11 | |
| Model 3 | Ref | 6.48 | 0.31 | − 6.08 | 19.04 | 2.33 | 0.77 | − 13.06 | 17.72 | 17.92* | 1.85 | 34.00 | |
| School QoL | |||||||||||||
| Model 1 | Ref | 3.26 | 0.54 | − 7.23 | 13.75 | − 3.21 | 0.56 | − 13.95 | 7.53 | − 1.72 | 0.75 | − 12.46 | 9.02 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 4.74 | 0.35 | − 5.23 | 14.72 | − 5.31 | 0.32 | − 15.80 | 5.18 | 1.01 | 0.86 | − 10.38 | 12.39 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 2.26 | 0.64 | − 7.20 | 11.72 | − 4.39 | 0.45 | − 15.84 | 7.06 | − 0.31 | 0.96 | − 12.17 | 11.55 |
| Psychosocial QoL | |||||||||||||
| Model 1 | Ref | 5.81 | 0.22 | − 3.53 | 15.14 | − 1.26 | 0.80 | − 10.81 | 8.30 | 2.67 | 0.59 | − 7.01 | 12.35 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 7.03 | 0.12 | − 1.75 | 15.81 | − 1.99 | 0.67 | − 11.23 | 7.24 | 6.97 | 0.18 | − 3.17 | 17.10 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 5.09 | 0.25 | − 3.64 | 13.82 | − 0.59 | 0.91 | − 11.15 | 9.97 | 8.04 | 0.15 | − 2.98 | 19.07 |
| Total QoL | |||||||||||||
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.48 | 0.93 | − 10.73 | 11.69 | − 0.78 | 0.89 | − 12.22 | 10.65 | 2.98 | 0.62 | − 8.71 | 14.68 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 5.56 | 0.18 | − 2.56 | 13.67 | − 4.75 | 0.27 | − 13.23 | 3.72 | 4.21 | 0.38 | − 5.10 | 13.53 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 3.71 | 0.37 | − 4.45 | 11.87 | − 5.02 | 0.31 | − 14.77 | 4.74 | 2.93 | 0.58 | − 7.43 | 13.28 |
The interaction of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and self-concept was divided into four groups, and group 1 as the reference category; model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for personal and environmental factors; model 3: adjusted for model 2 + health-related factors; *p < 0.05
Bold values indicates statistical significance
Moderating effects of sex, ID level, and parental education level on physical activity, quality of life and self-concept
| Sex | ID level | Parental education level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (n = 86) | Female (n = 31) | Mild ID (n = 61) | Moderate ID (n = 56) | < College/University (n = 75) | ≥ College/university (n = 42) | |
| Physical activity (min per day) a,g | ||||||
| LPAa,d,e,g | 267.34 ± 75.82 | 217.32 ± 74.75 | 242.38 ± 73.26 | 266.84 ± 82.44 | 247.34 ± 72.91 | 266.14 ± 87.01 |
| MPAc,e,g | 36.44 ± 24.76 | 27.18 ± 25.71 | 33.20 ± 22.09 | 34.83 ± 28.45 | 29.86 ± 20.36 | 41.34 ± 31.10 |
| VPA | 1.34 ± 1.72 | 0.83 ± 1.23 | 1.23 ± 1.73 | 1.18 ± 1.49 | 1.04 ± 1.36 | 1.51 ± 1.97 |
| MVPAc,e,g | 37.41 ± 25.60 | 28.01 ± 26.26 | 34.43 ± 23.03 | 35.44 ± 29.10 | 30.90 ± 21.07 | 42.09 ± 32.09 |
| Quality of life (QoL)b,d,f,g | ||||||
| Physical QoLb,d,f,g | 75.67 ± 19.09 | 71.03 ± 13.01 | 80.88 ± 16.35 | 68.52 ± 17.20 | 72.84 ± 18.29 | 77.62 ± 16.76 |
| Emotional QoLb,d | 69.87 ± 16.47 | 68.15 ± 11.19 | 73.08 ± 15.75 | 65.93 ± 14.04 | 68.48 ± 15.80 | 71.22 ± 14.26 |
| Social QoLb,d,f | 47.83 ± 23.95 | 47.31 ± 24.22 | 53.84 ± 22.41 | 41.79 ± 24.00 | 49.57 ± 23.78 | 44.17 ± 24.07 |
| School QoLb,d,f,g | 57.77 ± 20.52 | 59.26 ± 13.01 | 63.82 ± 17.86 | 52.59 ± 18.24 | 56.71 ± 17.25 | 60.81 ± 21.43 |
| Psychosocial QoLb,d,f,g | 58.61 ± 17.52 | 58.17 ± 14.49 | 63.56 ± 15.88 | 53.54 ± 16.20 | 58.48 ± 16.16 | 58.53 ± 18.00 |
| Total QoL b,d,f,g | 64.88 ± 16.45 | 63.05 ± 11.10 | 70.19 ± 14.40 | 58.89 ± 14.12 | 63.88 ± 14.98 | 65.44 ± 15.97 |
| Self-concept (SC) | ||||||
| Physical activity SC | 4.00 ± 1.36 | 3.61 ± 1.38 | 4.01 ± 1.30 | 3.79 ± 1.44 | 3.95 ± 1.50 | 3.78 ± 1.14 |
| Appearance SC | 4.48 ± 1.30 | 4.46 ± 1.22 | 4.45 ± 1.31 | 4.50 ± 1.25 | 4.59 ± 1.30 | 4.28 ± 1.22 |
| Global SC | 4.38 ± 1.29 | 4.22 ± 1.31 | 4.43 ± 1.17 | 4.25 ± 1.41 | 4.39 ± 1.31 | 4.36 ± 1.18 |
| Strength SC | 4.55 ± 1.18 | 4.20 ± 1.03 | 4.49 ± 1.10 | 4.42 ± 1.21 | 4.52 ± 1.16 | 4.38 ± 1.14 |
| Total SC | 4.35 ± 1.07 | 4.16 ± 1.02 | 4.34 ± 0.95 | 4.26 ± 1.15 | 4.36 ± 1.08 | 4.20 ± 1.01 |
MANOVA results were means and SDs
asignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the main effects of sex
bsignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the main effects of ID level
csignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the main effects of parental education level
dsignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the effects of interaction (sex by ID level)
esignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the effects of interaction (sex by parental education level)
fsignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the effects of interaction (ID level by parental education level)
gsignificant differences at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 for the effects of interaction (sex by ID level by parental education level)