Literature DB >> 36181548

The influence of age and health status for outcomes after mid-urethral sling surgery-a nationwide register study.

Julia Gyhagen1,2, Sigvard Åkervall2, Jennie Larsudd-Kåverud2,3, Mattias Molin4, Ian Milsom2,5, Adrian Wagg2,6, Maria Gyhagen7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The efficacy of mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery in older women and women with a significant disease burden is limited. We aimed to determine the influence of chronological age and physical status (assessed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, ASA) classification on outcomes.
METHODS: Cure rate, change in frequency of lower urinary tract symptoms, satisfaction, impact, and adverse events after MUS surgery were assessed in 5200 women aged 55-94 years with MUS surgery (2010-2017). Data were analysed by multivariate logistic regression and Mantel-Haenszel chi-square statistics.
RESULTS: The cure rate was 64.2% (95% CI, 60.0-68.4) in the ≥ 75-year cohort compared to 88.5% (95% CI, 87.1-89.8) in the 55-64-year cohort (trend p < 0.0001). The estimated probability of cure, improvement, and satisfaction with the procedure decreased by aOR10yr = 0.51 for cure to aOR10yr = 0.59 for satisfaction (all p < 0.0001). Women with a significant health burden (ASA class 3-4) had lower cure rates and satisfaction than those without (65.5% vs. 83.7%, p < 0.0001 and 65.7% vs. 80.6%, p < 0.0001). Older age was more likely to be associated with de novo urgency (p = 0.0022) and nocturia ≥ 2 (p < 0.0001). Adverse events, readmission, and 30-day mortality rates were low. Women, irrespective of age, were equally satisfied if they experienced a decrease of at least one step in leakage frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if MUS surgery in older women and those with ASA class 3-4 was associated with a lower cure rate and less satisfactory outcome, a majority were satisfied provided they experienced a reduction of incontinence episodes.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA class; De novo urgency; Mixed urinary incontinence; Old age; Remission; Stress urinary incontinence; Urgency incontinence

Year:  2022        PMID: 36181548     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05364-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Abigail A Ford; Lynne Rogerson; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Joseph A Ogah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

Review 2.  Dynamic progression of overactive bladder and urinary incontinence symptoms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Debra E Irwin; Ian Milsom; Michael B Chancellor; Zoe Kopp; Zhonghong Guan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Urinary incontinence and chronic conditions in the US population age 50 years and older.

Authors:  Sarunas P Daugirdas; Talar Markossian; Elizabeth R Mueller; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Guichan Cao; Holly Kramer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.