Luohai Chen1, Nuerailaguli Jumai1, Qiao He2, Man Liu1, Yuan Lin3, Yanji Luo4, Yu Wang5, Min-Hu Chen1, Zhirong Zeng1, Xiangsong Zhang6, Ning Zhang7. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 5. Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. zhxiangs@mail.sysu.edu.cn. 7. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. zhangn5@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to elucidate the role of quantitative tumor burden based on PET/CT of somatostatin receptors in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: This study enrolled patients with [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT-positive advanced NETs who did not receive medical treatment prior to PET/CT. Tumor burden was calculated using methods based on the background threshold and relative fixed threshold values (30%, 40%, and 50%). The prognostic value of the measured tumor burden in reference to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) was assessed using Cox regression analysis, Harrell's C-index, and survival analysis. A classification and regression tree (CART) was used to determine the optimal threshold for tumor burden. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included. Somatostatin receptor-expressing tumor volume (SRETV) and liver SRETV derived from a relative fixed threshold of 30% (SRETV30 and liver SRETV30) were statistically significantly associated with OS (C-index: 0.802 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.658-0.946] and 0.806 [95% CI, 0.664-0.948], respectively). Extrahepatic tumor burden was not correlated with OS (hazard ratio: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.241-1.574, P = 0.312). Among 155 patients with non-functional NETs with a ki-67 index of ≤ 10%, those with a high SRETV30 (P = 0.016) or high liver SRETV30 (P = 0.014) showed statistically significantly worse PFS on treatment with octreotide LAR. Patients receiving a higher dose of octreotide LAR normalized by SRETV30 or liver SRETV30 (a normalized dose or a liver normalized dose) showed prolonged PFS on treatment with octreotide LAR and a prolonged OS. CONCLUSION: Quantitative tumor burden based on [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT was correlated with OS and PFS in patients with non-functional NETs with a ki-67 index of ≤ 10% who received octreotide LAR. Calculating normalized and liver normalized doses may help in selecting the starting dose of octreotide LAR.
PURPOSE: We aimed to elucidate the role of quantitative tumor burden based on PET/CT of somatostatin receptors in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: This study enrolled patients with [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT-positive advanced NETs who did not receive medical treatment prior to PET/CT. Tumor burden was calculated using methods based on the background threshold and relative fixed threshold values (30%, 40%, and 50%). The prognostic value of the measured tumor burden in reference to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) was assessed using Cox regression analysis, Harrell's C-index, and survival analysis. A classification and regression tree (CART) was used to determine the optimal threshold for tumor burden. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included. Somatostatin receptor-expressing tumor volume (SRETV) and liver SRETV derived from a relative fixed threshold of 30% (SRETV30 and liver SRETV30) were statistically significantly associated with OS (C-index: 0.802 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.658-0.946] and 0.806 [95% CI, 0.664-0.948], respectively). Extrahepatic tumor burden was not correlated with OS (hazard ratio: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.241-1.574, P = 0.312). Among 155 patients with non-functional NETs with a ki-67 index of ≤ 10%, those with a high SRETV30 (P = 0.016) or high liver SRETV30 (P = 0.014) showed statistically significantly worse PFS on treatment with octreotide LAR. Patients receiving a higher dose of octreotide LAR normalized by SRETV30 or liver SRETV30 (a normalized dose or a liver normalized dose) showed prolonged PFS on treatment with octreotide LAR and a prolonged OS. CONCLUSION: Quantitative tumor burden based on [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT was correlated with OS and PFS in patients with non-functional NETs with a ki-67 index of ≤ 10% who received octreotide LAR. Calculating normalized and liver normalized doses may help in selecting the starting dose of octreotide LAR.
Authors: Marianne Pavel; Eric Baudin; Anne Couvelard; Eric Krenning; Kjell Öberg; Thomas Steinmüller; Martin Anlauf; Bertram Wiedenmann; Ramon Salazar Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: M Pavel; D O'Toole; F Costa; J Capdevila; D Gross; R Kianmanesh; E Krenning; U Knigge; R Salazar; U-F Pape; K Öberg Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: E Baudin; M Caplin; R Garcia-Carbonero; N Fazio; P Ferolla; P L Filosso; A Frilling; W W de Herder; D Hörsch; U Knigge; C M Korse; E Lim; C Lombard-Bohas; M Pavel; J Y Scoazec; A Sundin; A Berruti Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Michael S Broder; David Beenhouwer; Jonathan R Strosberg; Maureen P Neary; Dasha Cherepanov Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Anja Rinke; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Klaus-Jochen Klose; Peter Barth; Matthias Wied; Christina Mayer; Behnaz Aminossadati; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Michael Bläker; Jan Harder; Christian Arnold; Thomas Gress; Rudolf Arnold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martyn E Caplin; Marianne Pavel; Jarosław B Ćwikła; Alexandria T Phan; Markus Raderer; Eva Sedláčková; Guillaume Cadiot; Edward M Wolin; Jaume Capdevila; Lucy Wall; Guido Rindi; Alison Langley; Séverine Martinez; Joëlle Blumberg; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777