| Literature DB >> 36181096 |
Qinqin Wang1, Huixiang Zou, Qin Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Teach-back is a teaching method that can quickly improve the acknowledge of target audience and change their behaviors effectively. However, this approach has not been reported in previous studies that were dedicated to reducing the incidence of falls in elderly inpatients. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the teach-back method for improving the knowledge, confidence, and behaviors (KCB) of professional caregivers on the fall prevention in elderly inpatients and to provide practical evidence for reducing the incidence of falls.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36181096 PMCID: PMC9524941 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Comparison of general data of two groups.
| Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | χ2/ |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, n (%) | 0.162 | .687 | ||
| Male | 21 (42.0) | 23 (46.0) | ||
| Female | 29 (58.0) | 27 (54.0) | ||
| Level of education, n (%) | 0.372 | .542 | ||
| Primary education and below | 28 (56.0) | 31 (62.0) | ||
| Junior high school and above | 22 (44.0) | 19 (38.0) | ||
| Age (yr) | 51 ± 2.821 | 52 ± 2.740 | 1.832 | .073 |
| Years of working (yr) | 8.5 ± 3.228 | 8.0 ± 2.673 | 1.115 | .270 |
| Whether there is fall-related training, n (%) | 0.585 | .444 | ||
| Yes | 39(78.0) | 42(84.0) | ||
| No | 11(22.0) | 8(16.0) |
Comparisons of scores of knowledge dimension.
| Number of paticipants | Before the interventions | 3 mo after the interventions | 6 mo after the interventions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 50 | 39.78 ± 2.27 | 52.58 ± 2.87 | 60.06 ± 3.62 |
| Observation group | 50 | 39.56 ± 2.65 | 56.92 ± 2.38 | 65.86 ± 2.45 |
|
| 0.460 | −8.410 | −9.623 | |
|
| .670 | <.001 | <.001 |
Comparisons of scores of confidence dimension.
| Number of paticipants | Before the interventions | 3 mo after the interventions | 6 mo after the interventions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 50 | 34.12 ± 1.88 | 38.76 ± 2.26 | 40.48 ± 1.97 |
| Observation group | 50 | 34.32 ± 1.71 | 41.08 ± 1.78 | 43.14 ± 1.14 |
|
| −0.552 | −5.457 | −9.835 | |
|
| .584 | <.001 | <.001 |
Comparisons of scores of behavior dimension.
| Number of paticipants | Before the interventions | 3 mo after the interventions | 6 mo after the interventions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 50 | 30.72 ± 1.63 | 38.76 ± 2.26 | 40.48 ± 1.97 |
| Observation group | 50 | 34.32 ± 1.71 | 41.08 ± 1.78 | 43.14 ± 1.14 |
|
| −0.552 | −5.457 | −9.835 | |
|
| .584 | <.001 | <.001 |
Comparisons of the incidence of falls.
| Fallers | Non-fallers | χ2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group, n (%) | 9 (1.32) | 675 (98.68) | 2.115 | .040 |
| Observation group, n (%) | 2 (0.30) | 656 (99.70) |