| Literature DB >> 36181073 |
Jing Lin1, Meiling Jiang, Jinmiao Liu, Lan Yao.
Abstract
Transient ischemic attack (TIA) carries a particularly high short-term risk of stroke, which is associated with brain dysfunction caused by a regional reduction in blood flow. Transitional care services present benefits in improving ischemic neurological function and decreasing the recurrence in patients with TIA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of transitional care on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for TIA. We retrospectively collected data about 1288 patients with TIA from May 2017 to June 2019. Patients were divided into mild (n = 438), moderate (n = 420) and severe group (n = 430) accessed by age, blood pressure, type of TIA, and duration (ABCD2) score. Participants were patients hospitalized due to TIA, assigned to transitional care (n = 643) or usual care (n = 645), and followed up for 24 months. Physical function of patients was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test. We evaluated patient reach, implementation using hospital quality measures, hospital-level sustainability physical function, ischemic neurological score, composite quality indicator score, and recurrence of TIA between transitional care or usual care group. TIA patients in transitional care group had better physical function and quality indicator score, lower ischemic neurological score and recurrence of TIA, and shorter hospital stay than patients in usual care group. Results demonstrated that transitional care significantly improved the patients' satisfaction compared to usual care. Patients in mild, moderate, and severe group presented more benefits than usual care clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for TIA. Transitional care is associated with better functional status for patients with TIA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36181073 PMCID: PMC9524928 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1.Study design flow of patients with transient ischemic attack.
Characteristics of patients with transient ischemic attack.
| Transitional care | Usual care | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr-old) | 54.5 ± 7.5 | 52.5 ± 8.0 | .84 |
| Male | 310 (24.1%) | 300 (23.2%) | .92 |
| Female | 333 (25.9%) | 345 (26.8%) | .76 |
| Mild | 218 (16.9%) | 220 (17.1%) | .88 |
| Moderate | 215 (16.7%) | 205 (15.9%) | .85 |
| Severe | 210 (16.3%) | 220 (17.1%) | .81 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 432 (33.5%) | 425 (33.0%) | .96 |
| Hypercholesterolemia, n (%) | 115 (8.9%) | 120 (9.3%) | .95 |
| Heart failure, n (%) | 98 (7.6%) | 102 (7.9%) | .70 |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 105 (8.2%) | 110 (8.5%) | .93 |
| Coronary artery disease, n (%) | 120 (9.3%) | 116 (9.0%) | .87 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.5 ± 2.5 | 25.0 ± 3.0 | .89 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%). The P values were analyzed using independent sample t test or Kruskal–Wallis test.
Analysis the effect of transitional care and usual care on parameters in patients with transient ischemic attack.
| Usual care | Transitional care | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Mild | 43 ± 5 | 56 ± 6 | .028[ |
| Moderate | 36 ± 8 | 45 ± 5 | .006[ |
| Severe | 25 ± 6 | 37 ± 6 | .002[ |
|
| |||
| Mild | 20 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 | .046[ |
| Moderate | 16 ± 3 | 20 ± 3 | .004[ |
| Severe | 8 ± 2 | 14 ± 3 | .002[ |
|
| |||
| Mild | 6 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | .040[ |
| Moderate | 9 ± 2 | 5 ± 2 | .005[ |
| Severe | 12 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 | .004[ |
|
| |||
| Mild | 8 ± 2 | 6 ± 2 | .012[ |
| Moderate | 14 ± 3 | 11 ± 3 | .036[ |
| Severe | 18 ± 4 | 15 ± 3 | .038[ |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The P values were analyzed using independent sample t test.
P < .05.
P < .01.
Analysis the effect of transitional care and usual care on of recurrence transient ischemic attack.
| Usual care | Transitional care | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Mild | 12 (5.5%) | 10 (4.5%) | .074 |
| Moderate | 34 (15.8%) | 17 (8.3%) | .005[ |
| Severe | 45 (21.4%) | 22 (10%) | .004[ |
Data are expressed as n (%). The P values were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test.
P < .01.
Analysis the effect of transitional care and usual care on satisfaction communication capacity and physical function of transient ischemic attack after discharge to home.
| Transitional care | Usual care | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Mild | 24 ± 4 | 26 ± 5 | .068 |
| Moderate | 20 ± 5 | 25 ± 5 | .040[ |
| Severe | 18 ± 6 | 26 ± 4 | .036[ |
|
| |||
| Mild | 6 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 | .508 |
| Moderate | 4 ± 2 | 6 ± 2 | .042[ |
| Severe | 3 ± 1 | 5 ± 2 | .030[ |
|
| |||
| Mild | 84 ± 10 | 89 ± 8 | .040[ |
| Moderate | 72 ± 12 | 80 ± 7 | .037[ |
| Severe | 57 ± 9 | 72 ± 10 | .007[ |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. A total of 12-month follow up was performed in this study. The P values were analyzed using independent sample t test, Mann–Whitney U test or chi-square test.
P < .05.
P < .01.