| Literature DB >> 36181039 |
Zhen Li1, Xin Mao, Xiuxiu Cui, Tingting Yu, Mengmeng Zhang, Xiya Li, Guangsen Li.
Abstract
To evaluate carotid elasticity by using two-dimensional strain imaging (2DSI) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 98 patients with T2DM diagnosed in our hospital were selected. All the patients were without carotid plaque, which were proved by carotid ultrasonography. According to the fatty liver classification standard, patients were divided into three groups. There were 35 cases without NAFLD in group A, 33 cases with mild NAFLD in group B and 30 cases with moderate to severe NAFLD in group C. By using two-dimensional and M-mode ultrasound to measure the left carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), common carotid arterial systolic diameter (Ds) and diastolic diameter (Dd). The systolic peak velocity was measured by spectral Doppler ultrasound. The systolic global peak circumferential strain (CS), early and late systolic global circumferential strain rate (CSr) were measured by 2DSI. The stiffness parameters β1 and β2 were calculated by M-mode ultrasound and 2DSI separately. Among three groups, the Ds, Dd and systolic peak velocity showed no significant difference (all P > .05). In group C, IMT and β1 were obviously increased than those of groups A and B (all P < .05). Compared groups A and B, there were no significant difference in IMT and β1 (all P > .05). β2 was higher in groups B and C than those in group A, CS, CSr were lower in groups B and C than those in group A (both P > .05). The carotid elasticity of T2DM patients with NAFLD can be evaluated by 2DSI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36181039 PMCID: PMC9524962 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Comparison of general clinical and biochemical parameters among 3 groups (__x ± s).
| Clinical and biochemical parameters | Group A (n = 35) | Group B (n = 33) | Group C (n = 30) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 45.8 ± 8.3 | 48.3 ± 6.5 | 46.2 ± 7.1 |
| Male/female ratio | 20/15 | 21/12 | 18/12 |
| Heart rate (rates/min) | 72.86 ± 7.69 | 74.95 ± 9.47 | 77.04 ± 10.31 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.15 ± 2.16 | 25.78 ± 2.37 | 27.20 ± 3.26[ |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 126.03 ± 5.51 | 126.52 ± 5.83 | 127.5 ± 6.84 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 75.80 ± 7.36 | 77.42 ± 5.53 | 77.83 ± 7.72 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 8.49 ± 1.66 | 8.90 ± 1.79 | 8.92 ± 2.00 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.99 ± 1.92 | 8.52 ± 2.14 | 9.91 ± 2.08[ |
| ALT (U/I) | 20.97 ± 6.24 | 33.95 ± 9.98[ | 52.20 ± 21.79[ |
| AST (U/I) | 17.52 ± 4.79 | 29.27 ± 5.24[ | 35.78 ± 11.02[ |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.46 ± 1.06 | 5.42 ± 1.42 | 5.22 ± 1.36 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.53 ± 0.55 | 2.05 ± 1.11[ | 2.63 ± 1.28[ |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.55 ± 0.59 | 1.33 ± 0.47 | 1.32 ± 0.38 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.78 ± 0.47 | 2.89 ± 0.86 | 3.10 ± 0.91 |
BMI = body mass index, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, FBG = fasting blood glucose, HbA1c = glycosylated hemoglobin, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, TC = total cholesterol, TG = triglyceride, HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
P < .05, compared with group A.
P < .05, compared with group B.
Comparison of carotid artery conventional ultrasound parameters among 3 groups (__x ± s).
| Parameters | Group A (n = 35) | Group B (n = 33) | Group C (n = 30) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMT (mm) | 0.64 ± 0.12 | 0.66 ± 0.14 | 0.83 ± 0.19[ |
| Ds (mm) | 6.95 ± 0.52 | 7.05 ± 0.48 | 7.14 ± 0.39 |
| Dd (mm) | 6.40 ± 0.45 | 6.49 ± 0.41 | 6.54 ± 0.39 |
| D (mm) | 0.60 ± 0.11 | 0.57 ± 0.09 | 0.59 ± 0.10 |
| β1 | 5.55 ± 1.72 | 5.60 ± 1.44 | 6.02 ± 1.24[ |
| PSV (cm/s) | 59.87 ± 11.23 | 58.43 ± 10.94 | 58.52 ± 10.56 |
IMT = intima-media thickness, Ds = systolic diameter, Dd = diastolic diameter, D = systolic diameter (Ds) - diastolic diameter (Dd), PSV = systolic peak velocity.
P < .05, compared with group A.
P < .05, compared with group B.
Comparison of two-dimensional strain parameters of carotid artery in 3 groups (__x ± s).
| Parameters | Group A (n = 35) | Group B (n = 33) | Group C (n = 30) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS(%) | 8.57 ± 1.90 | 6.99 ± 1.91[ | 5.43 ± 1.30[ |
| The early systolic global CSr (s-1) | 1.01 ± 0.34 | 0.82 ± 0.27[ | 0.69 ± 0.16[ |
| The late systolic global CSr (s-1) | −0.45 ± 0.10 | −0.39 ± 0.10[ | −0.35 ± 0.12[ |
| β2 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02[ | 0.09 ± 0.01[ |
CS = circumferential strain, CSr = circumferential strain rate.
P < .05, compared with group A.
P < .05, compared with group B.
Figure 1.The early and late systolic global CSr curves of CCA in group A, B, and C. CSr = circumferential strain rate.
Figure 2.The systolic global peak CS curves of CCA in group A, B, and C. CS = circumferential strain.
Reliability analysis of two-dimensional strain measurement of carotid artery.
| Intra-observer | Inter-observer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | ICC | 95% consistency limit |
| ICC | 95% consistency limit |
| |
| CS | 0.922 | 0.831–0.965 | <.001 | 0.899 | 0.784–0.954 | <.001 | |
| The early systolic global CSr (s-1) | 0.878 | 0.742–0.944 | <.001 | 0.848 | 0.685–0.930 | <.001 | |
| The late systolic global CSr (s-1) | 0.829 | 0.650–0.921 | <.001 | 0.794 | 0.586–0.904 | <.001 | |
CS = circumferential strain, CSr = circumferential strain rate, ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient.