| Literature DB >> 36180563 |
Na Wang1,2,3,4, Yuhu Luo5,6,7,8, Zhe Liu5,6,7,8, Yingying Sun5,6,7,8.
Abstract
The ecological environment in Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi is fragile, so the soil pollution caused by the exploitation of coal resources cannot be ignored. With Shigetai Coal Mine in Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi as the object of study for field survey and sampling, the content of heavy metals in soil is analyzed, the environmental pollution in the research area is evaluated by the single factor pollution index method, comprehensive pollution index method and potential ecological risk index method, and the spatial distribution characteristics of heavy metals are discussed by the geostatistics method. According to the study results, the average contents of heavy metals Hg, Cd, Pb and Cr are 2.03, 1.36, 1.11 and 1.23 times of the soil background values in Shaanxi Province respectively and the average contents of other heavy metals are lower than the soil background values in Shaanxi Province; Hg and Cd show moderate variation while As, Pb, Cr, Zn, Ni and Cu show strong variation; the skewness coefficients and kurtosis coefficient of Cd, As and Cu in the soil within the research area are relatively high, and these elements are accumulated in large amounts. Single factor pollution index (Pi) and potential ecological risk index (E) indicate that heavy metal Hg is the main pollution factor and mainly distributed in the east and north of the research area. The comprehensive index of potential ecological risk (RI) of the research area is 1336.49, showing an extremely high ecological risk, and the distribution characteristics of potential ecological risk are consistent with that of potential ecological risk index (E) of Hg. The results of ecological risk warning show that Hg is in a slight warning status, while Cd, Pb and Cr are in a warning status. The areas with high ecological risk warning values are mainly distributed in the east and north, and the whole research area shows relatively obvious zonal distribution law. The soil is disturbed greatly during the coal mining, so the ecological governance of the mine area shall adapt to the local natural conditions and regional environmental characteristics and follow the principle of "adjusting governance measures based on specific local conditions and classifications". An environmentally sustainable governance manner shall be adopted to realize the protection of the ecological environment and high-quality development of coal resources.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36180563 PMCID: PMC9525309 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20865-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Location of the research area and the distribution of sampling points (created by Arcgis 10.8, http://desktop.arcgis.com/cn/).
Executive standard for test of heavy metal contents.
| Element | Test basis | Test limit (mg/kg) | Test Equipment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | GB/T 22105.1-2008 | 0.002 | BAF-2000 atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer |
| Cd | GB/T 17141-1997 | 0.01 | SOLAAR M6 atomic absorption spectrometer |
| As | GB/T 22105.2-2008 | 0.01 | BAF-2000 atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer |
| Pb | GB/T 17141-1997 | 0.10 | SOLAAR M6 atomic absorption spectrometer |
| Cr | HJ 350-2007 | 0.40 | ICP-5000 inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer |
| Zn | HJ 350-2007 | 0.10 | ICP-5000 inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer |
| Ni | HJ491-2019 | 3.0 | SOLAAR M6 atomic absorption spectrometer |
| Cu | HJ491-2019 | 1.0 | SOLAAR M6 atomic absorption spectrometer |
Classification standard for single factor pollution index and Nemerow pollution index.
| Pollution grade | Pollution level | Pollution level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Without pollution | Clean/safe | ||
| 2 | 1 < | Mild pollution | 0.7 < | Almost clean/close to the warning line |
| 3 | 2 < | Moderate pollution | 1 < | Mild pollution |
| 4 | Heavy pollution | 2 < | Moderate pollution | |
| 5 | / | / | Heavy pollution |
Environmental background values and toxic-response parameters of heavy metals in the soil.
| Element | Hg | Cd | As | Pb | Cr | Zn | Ni | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.063 | 0.76 | 11.1 | 21.4 | 62.5 | 69.4 | 28.8 | 21.4 | |
| 40 | 30 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Classification of risk degree of RI and IER.
| Class | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Low | No | ||
| II | 40 < | Medium | 0 < | Early |
| III | 80 < | High | 1 < | Low |
| IV | 160 < | Very high | 3 < | Medium |
| V | Extremely high | High | ||
Statistics of contents of heavy metals in wasteland soil (n = 79).
| Parameter | Hg | Cd | As | Pb | Cr | Zn | Ni | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum (mg/kg) | 0.043 | 0.44 | 2.66 | 11.80 | 40.50 | 18.90 | 4.31 | 4.96 |
| Maximum (mg/kg) | 0.255 | 2.23 | 18.40 | 42.80 | 118.60 | 70.10 | 28.10 | 46.25 |
| Average (mg/kg) | 0.128 | 1.03 | 4.73 | 23.80 | 76.22 | 46.94 | 16.11 | 12.10 |
| Coefficient of variation (CV) | 0.050 | 0.37 | 2.81 | 7.46 | 18.00 | 13.51 | 5.44 | 5.64 |
| Skewness coefficient | 0.389 | 0.36 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.47 |
| Kurtosis coefficient | 0.808 | 1.91 | 1.39 | 0.76 | 0.36 | − 0.36 | − 0.01 | 2.90 |
| Background value of Shaanxi soil (mg/kg) | 0.063 | 0.76 | 11.1 | 21.4 | 62.5 | 69.4 | 28.8 | 21.4 |
Ecological risk of heavy metals in the surface soil within the research area.
| Parameter | Pi | NPI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | Cd | As | Pb | Cr | Zn | Ni | Cu | ||
| Minimum | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.24 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.80 |
| Maximum | 4.05 | 2.94 | 1.66 | 2.00 | 1.92 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 2.16 | 3.20 |
| Average | 2.03 | 1.14 | 0.59 | 1.11 | 1.22 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 1.64 |
| Pollution class | III | II | I | II | II | I | I | I | III |
Figure 2Spatial distribution of Pi and NPI of heavy metal in the study area (created by Arcgis 10.8, http://desktop.arcgis.com/cn/).
Evaluation of ecological risk of heavy metals in the surface soil within the research area.
| Parameter | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | Cd | As | Pb | Cr | Zn | Ni | Cu | ||
| Minimum | 27.30 | 17.21 | 2.40 | 2.76 | 1.30 | 0.27 | 0.75 | 1.16 | 53.44 |
| Maximum | 161.90 | 88.11 | 16.58 | 10.00 | 3.80 | 1.01 | 4.88 | 10.81 | 6400.00 |
| Average | 81.01 | 34.13 | 5.90 | 5.56 | 2.44 | 0.68 | 2.80 | 2.83 | 1336.49 |
| Pollution class | High | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Extremely high |
E stands for the individual potential ecological risk index.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of single ecological risk index (E) of heavy metals (created by Arcgis 10.8, http://desktop.arcgis.com/cn/).
Figure 4Spatial distribution of RI of heavy matals(created by Arcgis 10.8, http://desktop.arcgis.com/cn/).
Warning of ecological risks of heavy metals in surface soil within the research area.
| Parameter | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | Cd | As | Pb | Cr | Zn | Ni | Cu | ||
| Minimum | − 0.32 | − 0.43 | − 0.76 | − 0.45 | − 0.35 | − 0.73 | − 0.85 | − 0.77 | − 34.80 |
| Maximum | 3.05 | 1.94 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.01 | − 0.02 | 1.16 | 81.00 |
| Average | 1.03 | 0.14 | − 0.41 | 0.11 | 0.22 | − 0.32 | − 0.44 | − 0.43 | − 1.13 |
| Warning class | Low | Early | No | Early | Early | No | No | No | No |
Figure 5Ecological risk warning assessment of heavy metals in the study area (created by Arcgis 10.8, http://desktop.arcgis.com/cn/).