Literature DB >> 36177867

Epitweetr: Early warning of public health threats using Twitter data.

Laura Espinosa1, Ariana Wijermans1, Francisco Orchard2, Michael Höhle3, Thomas Czernichow2,4, Pietro Coletti5, Lisa Hermans5, Christel Faes5, Esther Kissling2, Thomas Mollet1,6.   

Abstract

BackgroundThe European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) systematically collates information from sources to rapidly detect early public health threats. The lack of a freely available, customisable and automated early warning tool using data from Twitter prompted the ECDC to develop epitweetr, which collects, geolocates and aggregates tweets generating signals and email alerts.AimThis study aims to compare the performance of epitweetr to manually monitoring tweets for the purpose of early detecting public health threats.MethodsWe calculated the general and specific positive predictive value (PPV) of signals generated by epitweetr between 19 October and 30 November 2020. Sensitivity, specificity, timeliness and accuracy and performance of tweet geolocation and signal detection algorithms obtained from epitweetr and the manual monitoring of 1,200 tweets were compared.ResultsThe epitweetr geolocation algorithm had an accuracy of 30.1% at national, and 25.9% at subnational levels. The signal detection algorithm had 3.0% general PPV and 74.6% specific PPV. Compared to manual monitoring, epitweetr had greater sensitivity (47.9% and 78.6%, respectively), and reduced PPV (97.9% and 74.6%, respectively). Median validation time difference between 16 common events detected by epitweetr and manual monitoring was -48.6 hours (IQR: -102.8 to -23.7).ConclusionEpitweetr has shown sufficient performance as an early warning tool for public health threats using Twitter data. Since epitweetr is a free, open-source tool with configurable settings and a strong automated component, it is expected to increase in usability and usefulness to public health experts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Twitter; early warning; epidemic intelligence; machine learning; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36177867      PMCID: PMC9524055          DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.39.2200177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


  10 in total

1.  Initial evaluation of the early aberration reporting system--Florida.

Authors:  Yiliang Zhu; W Wang; D Atrubin; Y Wu
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2005-08-26

2.  What is epidemic intelligence, and how is it being improved in Europe?

Authors:  R Kaiser; D Coulombier; M Baldari; D Morgan; C Paquet
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2006-02-02

3.  Comparing syndromic surveillance detection methods: EARS' versus a CUSUM-based methodology.

Authors:  Ronald D Fricker; Benjamin L Hegler; David A Dunfee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy.

Authors:  Karlijn J van Stralen; Vianda S Stel; Johannes B Reitsma; Friedo W Dekker; Carmine Zoccali; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Social media posts and online search behaviour as early-warning system for MRSA outbreaks.

Authors:  Tom H van de Belt; Pieter T van Stockum; Lucien J L P G Engelen; Jules Lancee; Remco Schrijver; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño; Evelina Tacconelli; Katja Saris; Marleen M H J van Gelder; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Use of Twitter data to improve Zika virus surveillance in the United States during the 2016 epidemic.

Authors:  Shahir Masri; Jianfeng Jia; Chen Li; Guofa Zhou; Ming-Chieh Lee; Guiyun Yan; Jun Wu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Using Big Data to Monitor the Introduction and Spread of Chikungunya, Europe, 2017.

Authors:  Joacim Rocklöv; Yesim Tozan; Aditya Ramadona; Maquines O Sewe; Bertrand Sudre; Jon Garrido; Chiara Bellegarde de Saint Lary; Wolfgang Lohr; Jan C Semenza
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Early warnings of COVID-19 outbreaks across Europe from social media.

Authors:  Milena Lopreite; Pietro Panzarasa; Michelangelo Puliga; Massimo Riccaboni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Tsao; Helen Chen; Therese Tisseverasinghe; Yang Yang; Lianghua Li; Zahid A Butt
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2021-01-28

10.  Retrospective analysis of the possibility of predicting the COVID-19 outbreak from Internet searches and social media data, China, 2020.

Authors:  Cuilian Li; Li Jia Chen; Xueyu Chen; Mingzhi Zhang; Chi Pui Pang; Haoyu Chen
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.