| Literature DB >> 36177391 |
Bei Li1, Xian-Guo Guo1, Tian-Guang Ren2, Pei-Ying Peng3, Wen-Yu Song1, Yan Lv1, Peng-Wu Yin1, Zhe Liu1,4, Xin-Hang Liu1,5, Ti-Jun Qian1.
Abstract
Based on a long-term field investigation in the five provincial regions of Southwest China between 2001 and 2019, the present paper studied the infestation and related ecology of chigger mites (chiggers) on the large Chinese vole (Eothenomys miletus), an endemic and dominant rodent species in the regions. A total of 52331 chiggers were collected from 2661 voles, and 52261 mites were identified as 185 species and 13 genera in the family Trombiculidae with very high species diversity. The identified 185 chigger species on E. miletus (a single rodent species) even exceeded those recorded in some countries. The overall infestation prevalence (P m = 53.96%), mean abundance (MA = 19.64) and mean intensity (MI = 36.39) on E. miletus were much higher than those on some other rodent species in the same regions. Although the species composition showed a moderate similarity (J = 0.63) between male and female hosts (E. miletus), the infestation indices (P m = 56.25%, MA = 21.67) of chiggers on male hosts were higher than those on the females (P m = 51.23%, MA = 17.09) (P < 0.05). Two dominant chigger species, Leptotrombidium scutellare (C r = 19.17%) and L. sinicum (C r = 11.06%), showed an aggregated distribution pattern among different individuals of their host E. miletus, and a relatively high degree of positive association existed between the two dominant chigger species with PCC = 0.57, DI = 0.60 and OI = 0.62 (x 2 = 857.46, P < 0.001). Leptotrombidium densipunctatum, Walchia koi, Helenicula hsui, L. scutellare and W. ewingi showed a high degree of environmental adaptability to their environments with high niche breadths. The theoretical curve of the species abundance distribution of chigger community on E. miletus was successfully fitted with Preston's lognormal distribution model. Based on the theoretical curve fitting, the expected total number of chigger species on E. miletus was roughly estimated to be 223 species, and 38 chigger species were probably missed in the sampling investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Acari; Chigger mite; Ectoparasite; Eothenomys miletus; Rodent; Trombiculidae
Year: 2022 PMID: 36177391 PMCID: PMC9513170 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.08.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.773
Fig. 1Investigation sites (n = 91) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China between 2001 and 2019 (The sites marked “▲” were newly increased sites after 2013 and those marked “*” were the sites where large Chinese voles, E. miletus, were captured. The name abbreviations of the investigation sites were shown in “Appendix”).
Analysis on interspecific association between dominant chigger species on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Dominant chigger species | Leptotrombidium | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | – | Total | ||
| Leptotrombidium | + | 220 ( | 50 ( | 273 ( |
| – | 238 ( | 2150 ( | 2388 ( | |
| Total | 458 ( | 2203 ( | 2661 ( | |
| Chi-square | 857.46 | |||
| Significance | P < 0.001 | |||
Annotation: In the above table, n = the total number of animal hosts (E. miletus), a = the host individuals simultaneously infested with chigger species X and Y, b = the host individuals only infested with chigger species X, c = the host individuals only infested with chigger species Y, and d = the host individuals without the infestation of chigger species X and Y.
Identified chigger mites (chiggers) from large Chinese voles (E. miletus) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Names of chigger mites | Individuals | Names of chigger mites | Individuals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10019 | 489 | ||
| 5778 | 32 | ||
| 3929 | 27 | ||
| 3336 | 17 | ||
| 3066 | 3 | ||
| 2 | |||
| 986 | 2 | ||
| 698 | 194 | ||
| 634 | 72 | ||
| 555 | 27 | ||
| 446 | 8 | ||
| 389 | 6 | ||
| 379 | 5 | ||
| 265 | 4 | ||
| 228 | 3 | ||
| 223 | 2 | ||
| 187 | 1 | ||
| 128 | 4398 | ||
| 119 | 746 | ||
| 116 | 38 | ||
| 105 | 24 | ||
| 105 | 23 | ||
| 104 | 14 | ||
| 70 | 13 | ||
| 67 | 10 | ||
| 57 | 7 | ||
| 57 | 4 | ||
| 54 | 1 | ||
| 53 | 1 | ||
| 53 | 3160 | ||
| 50 | 205 | ||
| 50 | 7 | ||
| 48 | 5 | ||
| 47 | 3 | ||
| 47 | 1 | ||
| 46 | 31 | ||
| 46 | 2 | ||
| 42 | 1 | ||
| 35 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 1425 | ||
| 26 | 763 | ||
| 25 | 81 | ||
| 22 | 77 | ||
| 20 | 59 | ||
| 20 | 52 | ||
| 20 | 38 | ||
| 16 | 19 | ||
| 14 | 35 | ||
| 13 | 17 | ||
| 13 | 13 | ||
| 12 | 8 | ||
| 11 | 4 | ||
| 11 | 3 | ||
| 11 | 1 | ||
| 11 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 1 | ||
| 9 | 47 | ||
| 9 | 3 | ||
| 7 | 1 | ||
| 7 | 1 | ||
| 7 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 1182 | ||
| 6 | 938 | ||
| 6 | 496 | ||
| 5 | 327 | ||
| 5 | 286 | ||
| 4 | 286 | ||
| 4 | 102 | ||
| 4 | 89 | ||
| 3 | 75 | ||
| 3 | 53 | ||
| 3 | 17 | ||
| 3 | 17 | ||
| 2 | 15 | ||
| 2 | 11 | ||
| 2 | 10 | ||
| 2 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 7 | ||
| 1 | 5 | ||
| 1 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 4 | ||
| 1 | 55 | ||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 1187 |
Infestations of chigger mites (chiggers) on different sexes of large Chinese voles (E. miletus) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Sexes of the voles | Individuals of the voles | Overall infestations of chiggers on the vole hosts | Constituent ratios ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Examined | Infested | Individuals | ||||||
| Female | 1183 | 606 | 51.23 | 17.09 | 33.37 | 20222 | 38.95 | 147 |
| Male | 1463 | 823 | 56.25 | 21.67 | 38.52 | 31701 | 61.05 | 167 |
| Total | 2646 | 1429 | 54.01 | 19.62 | 36.34 | 51923 | 100.00 | 185 |
Annotation: The animal hosts (E. miletus) without sex record were not included in the above table.
Analysis on spatial distribution pattern of two dominant chigger species on E. miletus in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Dominant chigger species | Patchiness index ( | Clump index ( | Cassie index ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.52 | 118.67 | 31.52 | |
| 41.47 | 87.88 | 40.47 |
Niche breadths of 18 main chigger species on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) in five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Chigger species | Codes | Individuals | Constituent ratios (%) | Niche breaths | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10019 | 19.17 | 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.68 | 0.87 | |
| 2 | 5778 | 11.06 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.48 | 0.55 | |
| 3 | 4398 | 8.42 | 0.39 | 0.14 | 0.55 | 0.69 | |
| 4 | 3929 | 7.52 | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.58 | 0.72 | |
| 5 | 3336 | 6.38 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 1.28 | |
| 6 | 3160 | 6.05 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.53 | |
| 7 | 3066 | 5.87 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.72 | |
| 8 | 1804 | 3.45 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.65 | |
| 9 | 1425 | 2.73 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.95 | |
| 10 | 1187 | 2.27 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 0.45 | |
| 11 | 1182 | 2.26 | 0.42 | 0.08 | 0.32 | 0.53 | |
| 12 | 986 | 1.89 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.36 | |
| 13 | 938 | 1.79 | 0.53 | 0.04 | 0.47 | 0.71 | |
| 14 | 763 | 1.46 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.87 | |
| 15 | 746 | 1.43 | 0.03 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.94 | |
| 16 | 698 | 1.34 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.64 | 0.66 | |
| 17 | 634 | 1.21 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 0.75 | |
| 18 | 555 | 1.06 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.67 | 0.82 | |
Annotation: B = the niche breaths along different altitudes; B = the niche breaths along different latitudes; B = the niche breaths along different habitats; B = the niche breaths along the combined environment series (multidimensional environment series).
Constituent ratios (C) of the 18 main chigger species on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) along different environment series (altitudes, latitudes and habitats) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Codes of chigger species | Constituent ratios ( | Constituent ratios ( | Constituent ratios ( | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1000 | 1000–2000 | 2000–3000 | ≥3000 | <24 | 24–26 | 26–28 | ≥28 | Woodland | Farmland | Bush | Residential area | |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.59 | 0.28 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.66 | 0.03 |
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.96 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.62 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.87 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.68 | 0.26 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.30 | 0.07 |
| 10 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
| 11 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
| 12 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.92 |
| 13 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 14 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
| 15 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
| 16 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
| 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
| 18 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
Annotation: The codes of chigger species are the same as in Table 5.
Fig. 2Niche breaths of the 18 main chigger species on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) along the combined environment series (multidimensional environment series) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
Niche overlaps (cosine similarity, cosθ) of the 18 main chigger species on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) along the combined environment series (multidimensional environment series) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Codes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
| 6 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| 7 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| 8 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| 9 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.89 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| 10 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.61 | 1.00 | |||||||
| 12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 13 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.27 | 1.00 | |||||
| 14 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.30 | 0.98 | 1.00 | ||||
| 15 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 0.46 | 0.10 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 1.00 | |||
| 16 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.99 | 0.60 | 0.09 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 1.00 | ||
| 17 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.15 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 1.00 |
Annotation: The codes of chigger species are the same as in Table 5.
Fig. 3The dendrogram of niche overlaps of the 18 main chigger species on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) along the combined environment series (multidimensional environment series) in the five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
The statistical parameters for fitting the theoretical curve of species abundance distribution of chigger mites on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) in five provincial regions of Southwest China (2001–2019).
| Log intervals | Individual ranges in each log interval | Midpoint values of each individual range | Actual chigger mite species | Theoretical chigger mite species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0–1 | 1 | 29 | 25.40 |
| 1 | 2–4 | 3 | 32 | 31.61 |
| 2 | 5–13 | 9 | 34 | 34.00 |
| 3 | 14–40 | 27 | 26 | 31.61 |
| 4 | 41–121 | 81 | 31 | 25.40 |
| 5 | 122–364 | 243 | 10 | 17.64 |
| 6 | 365–1093 | 729 | 12 | 10.59 |
| 7 | 1094–3280 | 2187 | 6 | 5.50 |
| 8 | 3281–9841 | 6561 | 4 | 2.46 |
| 9 | 9842–29254 | 19683 | 1 | 0.96 |
Fig. 4The species abundance distribution of chigger mites on large Chinese voles (E. miletus) fitted by Preston's lognormal distribution model with the theoretical equation of .
| Site abbr. | Names of investigation sites | Captured voles | Site abbr. | Names of investigation sites | Captured voles | Site abbr. | Names of investigation sites | Captured voles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AY▲ | Anyue | 0 | JY▲ | Jiangyang | 0 | SM | Simao | 0 |
| (Leshan) | ||||||||
| BC* | Binchuan | 34 | KR▲ | Karuo | 0 | SN▲ | Sinan | 0 |
| (Changdu) | ||||||||
| BY▲ | Bayi | 0 | LC* | Longchuan | 131 | SZ▲ | Shizhu | 0 |
| (Linzhi) | ||||||||
| CS▲ | Changshou | 0 | LH* | Lianghe | 129 | SZh▲ | Shizhong | 0 |
| (Leshan) | ||||||||
| CY* | Cangyuan | 2 | LHo▲ | Luhuo | 0 | TN▲ | Tongnan | 0 |
| (Lincang) | ||||||||
| DC | Daocheng | 0 | LL* | Luliang | 2 | TZ▲ | Tongzhi | 0 |
| DJ▲ | Dianjiang | 0 | LLi* | Longli | 12 | WS | Wenshan | 0 |
| DL* | Dali | 1081 | LP* | Lanping | 13 | WuS▲ | Wusheng | 0 |
| DQ* | Deqin | 52 | LS▲ | Lushui | 0 | WX* | Weixi | 430 |
| DY▲ | Daying | 0 | LX▲ | Luxian | 0 | WY▲ | Weiyuan | 0 |
| DYu* | Duyun | 68 | LZ▲ | Lezhi | 0 | WZ▲ | Wanzhou | 0 |
| FC▲ | Fucheng | 0 | MEK▲ | Maerkang | 0 | XC | Xiangcheng | 0 |
| (Mianyang) | ||||||||
| FG▲ | Fugong | 0 | MG | Maguan | 0 | XGLL | Xianggelila | 0 |
| FL▲ | Fuling | 0 | MH | Menghai | 0 | XH▲ | Xuanhan | 0 |
| FY* | Fuyuan | 12 | MK▲ | Mangkang | 0 | XX* | Xixiu | 32 |
| (Anshun) | ||||||||
| GD▲* | Guiding | 23 | ML▲ | Mengla | 0 | XZ▲ | Xuzhou | 0 |
| (Yibin) | ||||||||
| GL▲* | Guanling | 1 | MLi* | Muli | 85 | YaJ▲ | Yajiang | 0 |
| GM* | Gengma | 3 | MN▲* | Mianning | 12 | YD* | Yongde | 106 |
| GS* | Gongshan | 18 | MY* | Miyi | 19 | YJ | Yuanjiang | 0 |
| GZ▲ | Ganzi | 0 | MZ | Mengzi | 0 | YL* | Yulong | 19 |
| Lijiang | ||||||||
| HK | Hekou | 0 | NE | Ninger | 0 | YoY▲* | Youyang | 2 |
| HS▲* | Huishui | 4 | PA▲* | Puan | 103 | YuY▲ | Yunyang | 0 |
| HX* | Huaxi | 48 | PC▲ | Pingchang | 0 | YY* | Yanyuan | 30 |
| (Guiyang) | ||||||||
| HY▲ | Hongya | 0 | PS▲ | Pingshan | 0 | ZA▲ | Zhengan | 0 |
| JC* | Jianchuan | 83 | QB | Qiubei | 0 | ZF▲ | Zhenfeng | 0 |
| JH | Jinghong | 0 | QJ | Qiaojia | 0 | ZJ* | Zhijin | 50 |
| JJ▲ | Jiangjin | 0 | QW▲ | Qianwei | 0 | ZS▲* | Zhongshan | 17 |
| (Liupanshui) | ||||||||
| JK▲ | Jiangkou | 0 | RJ▲ | Rongjiang | 0 | ZX▲ | Zhongxian | 0 |
| JP▲* | Jinping | 4 | RL* | Ruili | 36 | ZZ▲ | Zizhong | 0 |
| JS▲ | Jinsha | 0 | RS▲ | Renshou | 0 | |||
| JT▲ | Jintang | 0 | SJ | Suijiang | 0 |
(Annotation: Site abbr. = the name abbreviations of the investigation sites. The investigation sites marked “▲” were newly increased sites after 2013 and those marked “*” were the sites where large Chinese voles, Eothenomys miletus, were captured).