| Literature DB >> 36177178 |
Paul Girard1,2,3, Joelle Dulong2,3, Jerome Duisit1, Camille Mocquard1,2,3, Simon Le Gallou2,3, Benoit Chaput4,5, Elise Lupon4, Eric Watier1, Audrey Varin5, Karin Tarte2,3, Nicolas Bertheuil1,2,3.
Abstract
Background: Nanofat grafting (NG) is a simple and cost-effective method of lipoaspirates with inter-syringe passages, to produce stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and isolate adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). This represents a tremendous interest in the future clinical needs of tissue engineering. In this study, we optimized the NG technique to increase the yield of ASC extractions.Entities:
Keywords: SVF; adipose derived stem cells; adipose tissue; clinical applicability; immunomodulatory properties; mechanical isolation; nanofat; recellularization
Year: 2022 PMID: 36177178 PMCID: PMC9513316 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.895735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1SVF phenotype gating strategy. Manual analysis on Kalooza software. (A) showed the gating of beads count. FVS-780 was the viability marker (B). (C) eliminate the doublets. CD235a stained erythrocytes (D). CD45 was expressed by hematopoietic cells (E). CD31 was expressed by endothelial cells (F). CD146 stained pericytes (on CD45− CD31−cells) (G). CD34 stained AUCs after an adapted gating strategy (G). CD11b, CD14, and CD16 (H) were pooled in a cocktail of antibodies on the same filter and stained myeloid cells. CD15 stained granulocytes (I). CD19 stained B cells (J), CD3 stained the T cells (K). CD335 stained NK cells (K).
FIGURE 2Analysis of the cell populations from each SVF obtained for various methods. The results are expressed as the number of cells per gram of the initial fresh tissue. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, and ***p < 0.0001; ns: not significant. SVF: stromal vascular fraction.
FIGURE 3Analysis of the hematopoietic (CD45pos) populations from the SVFs. Results are expressed as a percentage of the total number of cells, for each population. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, and ***p < 0.0001; ns: not significant. SVF: stromal vascular fraction.
FIGURE 4Estimated distribution of the different SVF cell populations, distributed according to the color code indicated. The percentage represents the proportion of each cellular sub-population. SVF: stromal vascular fraction.
FIGURE 5ASC (CFU-F) representation in SVF. The results are expressed as a percentage of CFU-F. It was obtained by the number of CFU-F counted in relation to the number of cells sown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, and ***p < 0.0001; ns = not significant. ASCs: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells; CFU-F: colony-forming unit–fibroblast; SVF: stromal vascular fraction.
FIGURE 6Immunofluorescence by confocal microscopy of the different SVFs. In red, adipocytes are stained by BODIPY; in green, endothelial cells are stained by isolectin coupled with Alexa Fluor 488, and in blue, nucleated cells are stained by DAPI. Shades of gray: transmission electron microscopy imaging of the same section. * False positive, lipid vacuole. SVF: stromal vascular fraction.
FIGURE 7Polarization of macrophages after co-culture with ASCs at the end of P0. The results are expressed as the fluorescence ratio of the TEST tube/FMO tube, obtained by mono parametric test. If the ratio is < 1, the marker is not expressed; between 1 and 2, the expression of the marker cannot be concluded, and 2 the marker is expressed. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, and ***p < 0.0001; ns: not significant. ASCs: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.