| Literature DB >> 36176979 |
Jia Tan1, Siwei Bi2, Jingyi Li3, Jun Gu4, Yishun Wang1, Jiyue Xiong1, Xiang Yu1, Lei Du1.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcomes of four types of cardioplegia during cardiac surgery: del Nido (DN), blood cardioplegia (BC), histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and St. Thomas.Entities:
Keywords: HTK; St. Thomas; blood cardioplegia; cardiac protection; cardiac surgery; del Nido; network meta-analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36176979 PMCID: PMC9513158 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.996744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Flowchart for searching and identifying eligible studies.
Figure 2Network analysis of perioperative mortality across all adult trials. (A) The network plot shows the interventions included in the network analysis. Each node represents an intervention, and the thickness of connections between nodes reflects the number of studies in the comparison. (B) The league plot for perioperative mortality. The number in each cell refers to the comparison between the given column and row. Statistically significant results are marked with double asterisks. (C) Plot of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). BC, blood cardioplegia; DN, del Nido cardioplegia; HTK, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia.
Meta-analyses of trials directly comparing two types of cardioplegias.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | Perioperative mortality | DN vs. BC | 30 | 10,008 | 90/4,732 | 116/5,276 | 0.86 (0.65, 1.15) | 0.94 | 0 |
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 182 | 1/94 | 0/88 | 2.81 (0.12, 68.07) | - | - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 5 | 622 | 3/311 | 6/311 | 0.57 (0.17, 1.93) | 0.97 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 6 | 5,011 | 78/1,672 | 111/3,339 | 1.21 (0.90, 1.64) | 0.36 | 0.09 | ||
| HTK vs. St. Thomas | 2 | 292 | 7/169 | 4/123 | 1.11 (0.34, 3.66) | - | - | ||
| Atrial fibrillation | DN vs. BC | 25 | 5,998 | 796/3,049 | 713/2,949 |
| 0.15 | 0.23 | |
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 182 | 8/94 | 4/88 | 1.87 (0.58, 6.00) | - | - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 3 | 1,286 | 81/490 | 124/796 | 1.08 (0.83, 1.39) | 0.82 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 4 | 743 | 90/362 | 124/381 |
| 0.97 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. St. Thomas | 1 | 104 | 11/54 | 14/50 | 0.73 (0.37, 1.45) | - | - | ||
| Renal failure | DN vs. BC | 17 | 4,694 | 110/2,325 | 129/2,369 | 0.89 (0.71, 1.12) | 0.96 | 0 | |
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 1 | 200 | 2/100 | 3/100 | 0.67 (0.11, 3.90) | - | - | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 5 | 4,504 | 70/1,428 | 225/3,076 | 0.94 (0.71, 1.23) | 0.2 | 0.34 | ||
| Stroke | DN vs. BC | 24 | 6,332 | 59/3,116 | 52/3,216 | 1.18 (0.82, 1.70) | 0.96 | 0 | |
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 1 | 132 | 0/66 | 1/66 | 0.33 (0.0.1, 8.04) | - | - | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 3 | 4,134 | 32/1,243 | 58/2,891 | 1.21 (0.75, 1.94) | 0.55 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. St. Thomas | 1 | 104 | 0/54 | 0/50 | - | - | - | ||
| IABP | DN vs. BC | 11 | 3,881 | 91/1,996 | 94/1,885 | 1.03 (0.77, 1.37) | 0.43 | 0 | |
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 182 | 8/94 | 5/88 | 1.50 (0.51, 4.41) | - | - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 2 | 300 | 4/150 | 6/150 | 0.69 (0.21, 2.25) | 0.62 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 5 | 4,649 | 50/1,491 | 73/3,158 | 0.86 (0.60, 1.24) | 0.9 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. St. Thomas | 1 | 188 | 5/115 | 2/73 | 1.59 (0.32, 7.97) | - | - | ||
| Re-exploration | DN vs. BC | 13 | 3,581 | 31/1,429 | 62/2,152 | 0.93 (0.60, 1.42) | 0.66 | 0 | |
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 1 | 200 | 3/100 | 3/100 | 1.00 (0.21, 4.84) | - | - | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 3 | 2,596 | 91/1,298 | 91/1,298 | 1.00 (0.76, 1.31) | 0.8 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. St. Thomas | 2 | 292 | 22/169 | 14/123 | 1.07 (0.57, 2.01) | 0.27 | 0.18 | ||
| ICU stay | DN vs. BC | 23 | 4,376 | 2,079 | 2,297 | 2.82 (−0.42, 6.06) | 0.72 | ||
| DN vs. HTK | 2 | 222 | 115 | 107 | −0.58 (−2.36, 1.19) | 0.92 | |||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 5 | 1,585 | 649 | 936 | −2.40 (−5.69, 0.89) |
| 0.53 | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 7 | 1,409 | 697 | 712 | −0.58 (−2.36, 1.19) |
| 0.48 | ||
| HTK vs. St. Thomas | 1 | 104 | 54 | 50 | −14.40 (−45.24, 16.44) | - | - | ||
| Hospital stay | DN vs. BC | 22 | 4,686 | 2,386 | 2,300 | 0.16 (−0.06, 0.38) | 0.47 | ||
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 182 | 94 | 88 |
|
| - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 4 | 631 | 325 | 306 | −0.04 (−0.86, 0.78) | 0.84 | |||
| HTK vs. BC | 5 | 1,249 | 617 | 632 | −0.36 (−0.77, 0.05) |
| 0.61 | ||
| Children | Perioperative mortality | DN vs. BC | 2 | 281 | 2/137 | 6/144 | 0.34 (0.07, 1.70) | 0.43 | 0 |
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 100 | 1/50 | 1/50 | 1.00 (0.06, 15.55) | - | - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 2 | 620 | 14/310 | 20/310 | 0.70 (0.36, 1.36) | 0.35 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 3 | 313 | 7/145 | 8/168 | 1.06 (0.42, 2.69) | 0.28 | 0.22 | ||
| HTK vs. St.Thomas | 1 | 101 | 2/75 | 4/26 |
| - | - | ||
| ICU stay | DN vs. BC | 1 | 56 | 30 | 26 | 9.60 (−20.33, 39.53) | - | - | |
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 100 | 50 | 50 | −4.75 (−11.10, 1.60) | - | - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 5 | 839 | 422 | 417 | −2.71 (−39.67, 34.25) | 0.84 | |||
| HTK vs. BC | 2 | 263 | 120 | 143 | 25.88 (−18.38, 70.13) |
| 0.66 | ||
| HTK vs. St.Thomas | 1 | 101 | 75 | 26 |
| - | - | ||
| Hospital stay | DN vs. BC | 2 | 281 | 137 | 144 | −0.52 (−4.30, 3.26) | 0.82 | 0 | |
| DN vs. HTK | 1 | 100 | 50 | 50 |
| - | - | ||
| DN vs. St.Thomas | 3 | 680 | 340 | 340 | −0.53 (−2.92, 1.85) |
| 0.74 | ||
| HTK vs. BC | 2 | 263 | 120 | 143 | −0.27 (−2.70, 2.15) | 0.44 | 0 | ||
| HTK vs. St.Thomas | 1 | 101 | 75 | 26 |
| - | - |
Statistically significant results are shown in bold. BC, blood cardioplegia; CI, confidence interval; DN, del Nido cardioplegia; HTK, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; ICU, intensive care unit; MD, mean difference; RR, risk ratio.
Figure 3Network analysis of atrial fibrillation across all adult trials. (A) The network plot shows the interventions included in the network analysis. Each node represents an intervention, and the thickness of connections between nodes reflects the number of studies in the comparison. (B) The league plot for atrial fibrillation. The number in each cell refers to the comparison between the given column and row. Statistically significant results are marked with double asterisks. (C) Plot of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). BC, blood cardioplegia; DN, del Nido cardioplegia; HTK, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia.
Figure 4Network analysis of perioperative mortality across all pediatric trials. (A) The network plot shows the interventions included in the network analysis. Each node represents an intervention and the thickness of connections between nodes represent the number of studies involved in a comparison. (B) The league plot for perioperative mortality. The number in each cell refers to the comparison between the given column and row. (C) Plot of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). BC, blood cardioplegia; DN, del Nido cardioplegia; HTK, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia.