To the Editor: Dermatoscopy enables early diagnosis of melanoma, reducing morbidity and mortality. The present study evaluated the dermatoscopic features of pigmented lesions excised between January 2015 and March 2021 from patients at high risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) followed by a two-step method in the Hospital das Clinicas, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Dermatoscopic images stored in the FotoFinder® dermoscope were analyzed by 3 specialists independently, blinded to the histopathologic diagnosis. They were asked to assess the presence of predefined dermatoscopic features. For the monitored lesions, data were obtained right before excision, and substantial symmetric or asymmetric enlargement and arising of new structures were also evaluated. Divergent answers were discussed until a consensus.Patients under 18 years old and those with a congenital melanocytic nevus, xeroderma pigmentosum, bullous epidermolysis, ichthyosis, albinos, lesions with low-definition images, or located on the palms, soles, mucosa, and nails were excluded.The lesions were separated by histopathologic diagnosis (melanoma vs nevi) to compare dermatoscopic features. Qualitative variables were represented by absolute and relative frequencies. The Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the correlation between variables. Differences were statistically significant when P < .05.A total of 67 pigmented lesions from 26 patients were included (Table I). Twenty lesions were melanomas, with 80% in situ. The invasive melanomas had a maximum Breslow thickness of 0.5 mm. Melanomas showed 35% of negative pigment network, 70% of multiple colors, and 15% of bluish-white veil. Other dermatoscopic features had P > .05.
Table I
Comparative analysis of dermatoscopic features of melanomas versus nevi
Dermatoscopic features
Total
Melanoma
P
No
Yes
N = 67
n = 47
n = 20
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
Irregular pigment network
No
18 (26.9)
13 (27.7)
5 (25.0)
.822∗
Yes
49 (73.1)
34 (72.3)
15 (75.0)
Negative pigment network
No
54 (80.6)
41 (87.2)
13 (65.0)
.047†
Yes
13 (19.4)
6 (12.8)
7 (35.0)
Irregularly distributed globules/dots at the periphery
No
34 (50.7)
22 (46.8)
12 (60.0)
.323∗
Yes
33 (49.3)
25 (53.2)
8 (40.0)
Atypical vascular pattern
No
56 (83.6)
42 (89.4)
14 (70.0)
.072†
Yes
11 (16.4)
5 (10.6)
6 (30.0)
Regular blotches
No
56 (83.6)
38 (80.9)
18 (90.0)
.484†
Yes
11 (16.4)
9 (19.1)
2 (10.0)
Irregular blotches
No
37 (55.2)
29 (61.7)
8 (40.0)
.102∗
Yes
30 (44.8)
18 (38.3)
12 (60.0)
Multiple colors
No
35 (52.2)
29 (61.7)
6 (30.0)
.017∗
Yes
32 (47.8)
18 (38.3)
14 (70.0)
Radial streaming
No
62 (92.5)
44 (93.6)
18 (90.0)
.631†
Yes
5 (7.5)
3 (6.4)
2 (10.0)
Pseudopods
No
59 (88.1)
41 (87.2)
18 (90.0)
.999†
Yes
8 (11.9)
6 (12.8)
2 (10.0)
Peppering
No
62 (92.5)
44 (93.6)
18 (90.0)
.631†
Yes
5 (7.5)
3 (6.4)
2 (10.0)
Scar-like depigmentation
No
49 (73.1)
37 (78.7)
12 (60.0)
.114∗
Yes
18 (26.9)
10 (21.3)
8 (40.0)
Bluish-white veil
No
64 (95.5)
47 (100)
17 (85.0)
.024†
Yes
3 (4.5)
0
3 (15.0)
Pearson’s chi-square test.
Fisher’s exact test.
Comparative analysis of dermatoscopic features of melanomas versus neviPearson’s chi-square test.Fisher’s exact test.Forty-six lesions had been monitored for a minimal 3-month interval (Table II). Asymmetric enlargement was present in 80% of the melanomas, suggesting a tendency in this group. No statistically significant differences were observed in evolutive features, which may be explained by the fact that most melanomas arise de novo..
Table II
Monitored lesions and evolutive features: melanomas versus nevi
Type of change
Total
Melanoma
P∗
No
Yes
N = 46
n = 36
n = 10
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
Symmetric enlargement
No
37 (80.4)
28 (77.8)
9 (90.0)
.659
Yes
9 (19.6)
8 (22.2)
1 (10.0)
Asymmetric enlargement
No
22 (47.8)
20 (55.6)
2 (20.0)
.074
Yes
24 (52.2)
16 (44.4)
8 (80.0)
Arising of new structures
No
23 (50.0)
19 (52.8)
4 (40.0)
.722
Yes
23 (50.0)
17 (47.2)
6 (60.0)
Fisher’s exact test.
Monitored lesions and evolutive features: melanomas versus neviFisher’s exact test.Menzies et al also compared dermatoscopic features of melanomas and nevi. Negative pigment network and bluish-white veil were highly specific for melanomas. Multiple colors were significant among melanomas, and a single-color lesion was correlated with no melanomas.A Spanish study with 200 CMMs observed bluish-white veil and negative pigment network mainly in invasive melanomas. The multicomponent pattern (multiple colors and structures) was the most common global dermatoscopic feature.In our study, 3 lesions presented bluish-white veils, all melanomas, although only 1 was invasive. A negative pigment network was observed in 35% of the melanomas and 50% of the invasive ones. This mismatching is probably explained by the few invasive melanomas in our analysis.A recent review and meta-analyses of total-body photography for the diagnosis of CMM revealed the number needed to excise of 8.6 (range: 2.3-19.6). Our study had the number needed to excise of 3.35, showing good clinical decisions assisting high-risk patients.Dermatoscopic features can be decisive to biopsy a melanocytic lesion. In our study, negative pigment network, multiple colors, and bluish-white veil were significantly related to melanomas. Our results are in accordance with the literature and suggest that the melanoma-specific criteria might be the same in the Brazilian population.
Authors: Holger A Haenssle; Bianca Korpas; Christian Hansen-Hagge; Timo Buhl; Kjell M Kaune; Steven Johnsen; Albert Rosenberger; Michael P Schön; Steffen Emmert Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2010-03