| Literature DB >> 36176925 |
Zhiyu He1, Anming Liu1, Jiaxi Yu2, Xiaojun Chen1.
Abstract
A wound is the pathological change of soft tissue under normal skin caused by various factors, such as collision, contusion, hot crush, avulsion, corrosive chemicals, operations, excessive wound tension after operations, local pressure that cannot be relieved for a long time, liquid immersion, local infection, and rejection reactions caused by allogeneic substances. The skin itself or its underlying soft tissue loses its integrity and continuity, thus losing its normal physiological function. Medical image analysis is a medical term that refers to the interdisciplinary fields of integrated medical imaging, artificial intelligence, digital image processing and analysis, mathematical modeling, and numerical algorithms. According to the time of wound formation, they can be divided into acute and chronic wounds. The common acute wounds include lacerations caused by trauma, surgical incisions, burns, and donor sites formed after skin graft operations. This article mainly studies the role of platelet-rich plasma gel nanocomposites in promoting wound healing. It is proven that ptt-rich plasma gel can significantly promote tissue repair and regeneration and accelerate wound healing in patients with severe burns. The atomic number of the nanocomposite has a better treatment effect on the nanoparticle approach. In this paper, chitosan nanocomposite membrane, nanocomposite algorithm, and the calculation method of enthalpy of formation of high alloy nanomaterials were used to study the role of ptt-rich plasma gel combined chitosan nanocomposite membrane loaded bone marrow stromal cells in promoting wound healing, and its effects were applied to the repair of special site burns, special burns, and different age burns. Good wound repair benefits from the correct treatment of the wound, which directly affects the stability and development of the internal environment. The difference in healing time between the two groups was statistically significant, and the recovery time of the PRP group was 0.001 less than that of the control group. The results showed that the wound healing time of the PRP group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05); after treatment, the content of VEGF in the wound tissue of the two groups increased, especially in the PRP group; the effective rate of the PRP group was 75.0%, which was higher than 68.8% of the control group. It can play an important role in the regulation of expression and the pathophysiological process of wound healing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36176925 PMCID: PMC9499777 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1543604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Application of medical data mining.
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups.
| Baseline data | Control group | PRP |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 20 ± 0.59 | 18 | 0.566 |
| Male | 15 ± 0.55 | 17 | 0.251 |
| Female | 44 ± 0.87 | 43.25 | 0.332 |
| Age | 45 ± 0.21 | 44.35 | 0.117 |
| Course of disease | 50 ± 0.14 | 41 | 0.653 |
| Wound area | 3.5 ± 0.67 | 3.3 | 0.228 |
Main instruments and reagents.
| Serial number | Equipment | Reagent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ultra-low temperature refrigerator | Quantitative analysis of enzyme |
| 2 | Electronic scale | Calcium chloride injection |
| 3 | Low speed centrifuge | Thrombin |
| 4 | Microplate reader | Sodium hyaluronate injection |
| 5 | Epidural puncture needle | Amino acid |
Figure 2The repair process of ptt-rich plasma.
Comparison of healing time between the two groups.
| Group | Control group | PRP group |
|---|---|---|
| Healing time | 18.34 ± 0.029 | 12.36 ± 0.561 |
|
| 5.543 ± 0.034 | 3.243 ± 0.198 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.001 |
Figure 3Comparison of VEGF content in granulation tissue of the two groups before and after treatment.
Figure 4Treatment of platelet healing mechanism.
Histological changes of expanded skin.
| Serial number | Skin tissue |
|---|---|
| 1 | Epidermis |
| 2 | Dermis |
| 3 | Skin appendage |
| 4 | Subcutaneous fat layer |
| 5 | Muscle |
| 6 | Capsule layer |
Figure 5Comparison of VAS pain scores between the two groups before and after treatment.
Figure 6Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups after one week of treatment.
Figure 7Wound healing (https://alturl.com/fsoz6).