| Literature DB >> 36176693 |
Shenghao Liu1,2, Tingting Li1, Shuo Fang1, Pengying Zhang3, Dan Yi1, Bailin Cong1,2, Zhaohui Zhang1,4, Linlin Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Antarctica is the coldest, driest, and most windy continent on earth. The major terrestrial vegetation consists of cryptogams (mosses and lichens) and two vascular plant species. However, the molecular mechanism of cold tolerance and relevant regulatory networks were largely unknown in these Antarctic plants. Here, we investigated the global alterations in metabolites and regulatory pathways of an Antarctic moss (Pohlia nutans) under cold stress using an integrated multi-omics approach. We found that proline content and several antioxidant enzyme activities were significantly increased in P. nutans under cold stress, but the contents of chlorophyll and total flavonoids were markedly decreased. A total of 559 metabolites were detected using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS). We observed 39 and 71 differentially changed metabolites (DCMs) after 24 h and 60 h cold stress, indicating that several major pathways were differentially activated for producing fatty acids, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and phenolic acids. In addition, the quantitative transcriptome sequencing was conducted to uncover the global transcriptional profiles of P. nutans under cold stress. The representative differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and summarized to the function including Ca2+ signaling, ABA signaling, jasmonate signaling, fatty acids biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, and other biological processes. The integrated dataset analyses of metabolome and transcriptome revealed that jasmonate signaling, auxin signaling, very-long-chain fatty acids and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways might contribute to P. nutans acclimating to cold stress. Overall, these observations provide insight into Antarctic moss adaptations to polar habitats and the impact of global climate change on Antarctic plants.Entities:
Keywords: bryophytes; cold stress; flavonoids; metabolomic profiling; transcriptomic sequencing; very-long-chain fatty acids
Year: 2022 PMID: 36176693 PMCID: PMC9514047 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1006991
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1The moss Pohlia nutans has a potential capability of tolerance to cold stress. (A) Photo of moss gametophytes grown under normal condition. (B) Photo of moss gametophytes placed under 0°C for 60 h to carry out cold stress. (C–J) The biochemical features of mosses under cold stress. All experiments were repeated three times. Significant difference (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). Scale bar = 1.0 cm.
FIGURE 2Multivariate statistical analysis of metabolites in the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans. (A) Principal clustering analysis (PCA). (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA). (C,D) The OPLS-DA model supervised and calculated the variables responsible for differences between groups. R2X and R2Y indicate the interpretation rate of X and Y matrix, respectively. Q2Y represents the prediction ability of the model. A value closer to 1 means that the model is more stable and reliable. In addition, Q2Y > 0.5 can be regarded as an effective model, and Q2Y > 0.9 is an excellent model. C, Cold_24 h vs. CK. D, Cold_60 h vs. CK.
FIGURE 3Identification of differently accumulated metabolites in the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans under cold stress. (A,B) The volcano plot showing the contents of metabolites and the statistical significance. (A), Cold_24 h vs. CK. (B), Cold_60 h vs. CK. Each point represents a metabolite. Horizontal ordinate indicates the fold change of metabolites between two groups, while VIP value represents significant difference in statistical analysis. (C,D) The fold change of the top 20 different metabolites between two groups. (C), Cold_24 h vs. CK. (D), Cold_60 h vs. CK.
FIGURE 4Cluster analysis of significantly different metabolites in Pohlia nutans after cold stress. (A) k-means clustering algorithm analysis of metabolites. (B) Heatmap of significantly different metabolites sorted by metabolite classes in Pohlia nutans after 60 h of cold stress.
FIGURE 5Differentially expressed genes screening and Venn diagram analysis (A–C). The volcano plot showing the DEGs between cold stress group and control group. The X-axis indicates fold change of gene expression (threshold, | log2(Treat/Control)| > 0), while the Y-axis means the statistically significant level (threshold, log10(padj) > 1.3). (D) Venn diagram shows the DGEs distribution among different compare groups.
Representative cold stress-related genes of the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans. Data were summarized from the Supplementary Tables 8–10.
| Function or signaling pathway | Gene family | Cold_6 h vs Cold_0 h | Cold_24 h vs Cold_0 h | Cold_60 h vs Cold_0 h | |||
| Log2Fold Change (Treat/Control) | Ratio (up-regulated genes/total genes) | Log2Fold Change (Treat/Control) | Ratio (up-regulated genes/total genes) | Log2Fold Change (Treat/Control) | Ratio (up-regulated genes/total genes) | ||
| Ca2+ signaling | Calmodulin | 0.25∼6.91 | 10/10 | 0.18∼5.04 | 10/10 | −0.47∼3.66 | 4/5 |
| Calmodulin-binding protein 60 | 0.99∼2.10 | 4/4 | 0.88∼1.52 | 4/4 | −0.42∼0.63 | 1/2 | |
| Probable calcium-binding protein CML | 1.46∼7.42 | 23/23 | −0.41∼5.06 | 19/25 | −2.76∼3.35 | 15/22 | |
| Calmodulin-binding receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase | −1.17∼1.83 | 3/5 | −1.44∼1.35 | 6/7 | −2.32∼1.10 | 5/7 | |
| Calcium-activated potassium channel | −0.80∼2.37 | 4/6 | −2.64∼2.67 | 4/8 | −2.45∼1.30 | 2/7 | |
| Calcium-dependent protein kinase | −0.80∼2.44 | 9/12 | −2.09∼1.91 | 9/18 | −2.90∼0.33 | 1/15 | |
| Calcium-transporting ATPase | 0.39∼2.81 | 15/15 | −0.71∼4.54 | 16/17 | −1.46∼4.67 | 13/14 | |
| Sodium/calcium exchanger NCL1 | 1.66∼3.05 | 4/4 | −0.83∼2.26 | 4/6 | −1.17∼1.13 | 1/4 | |
| Synaptotagmin | 0.45∼3.52 | 9/9 | −1.05∼3.28 | 8/14 | −2.15–2.72 | 8/15 | |
| ABA signaling | 9- | 0.26∼5.19 | 6/6 | −0.45∼4.97 | 4/5 | −1.34∼4.30 | 3/5 |
| Abscisic acid receptor, PYL4/8 | −0.64∼2.35 | 2/6 | −1.50∼1.90 | 3/7 | −1.54∼0.70 | 3/8 | |
| Abscisic acid-insensitive 5, ABI5 | 2.33∼2.39 | 2/2 | 2.09∼2.18 | 2/2 | 1.36∼1.57 | 2/2 | |
| Abscisic acid and environmental stress-inducible protein, TAS14 | 2.63 | 1/1 | 2.12 | 1/1 | 0.43 | 1/1 | |
| Probable protein phosphatase 2C | −1.34∼3.87 | 30/35 | −2.36∼3.56 | 36/44 | −3.00∼2.59 | 34/46 | |
| Jasmonate signaling | 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 1/7/11 | −0.13∼4.91 | 16/17 | −2.24∼4.67 | 11/16 | −4.35∼3.85 | 9/19 |
| Putative 12-oxophytodienoate reductase | −0.13∼4.23 | 9/10 | −1.83 4.67 | 6/8 | −3.61∼3.85 | 6/11 | |
| Protein NINJA homolog | 2.72∼2.90 | 2/2 | 1.77∼2.05 | 2/2 | 1.25∼1.32 | 2/2 | |
| Protein TIFY | 0.39∼4.20 | 10/10 | 0.50∼1.51 | 9/9 | −0.81∼0.93 | 4/5 | |
| Auxin signaling | Auxin response factor, ARFs | −0.91∼0.98 | 12/15 | −1.14∼1.10 | 9/15 | −1.60∼0.51 | 4/17 |
| Auxin-responsive protein, SAURs | −1.63∼2.46 | 2/6 | −2.35∼1.82 | 3/7 | −3.83∼0.39 | 1/6 | |
| Auxin-induced protein 5NG4/6B | −1.23∼1.96 | 3/6 | −1.40∼2.54 | 6/8 | −2.32∼1.78 | 1/6 | |
| Transport inhibitor response 1-like protein | 0.69∼1.10 | 2/2 | 1.25∼2.34 | 2/2 | 0.73∼0.98 | 2/2 | |
| Gibberellin signaling | Gibberellin 20 oxidase | −2.12∼5.12 | 11/15 | −2.20∼3.54 | 12/19 | −3.86∼4.71 | 10/17 |
| Gibberellin 2-beta-dioxygenase (GA-deactivating enzyme) | −0.60∼1.96 | 1/3 | −1.77∼−1.23 | 0/3 | −4.65∼−0.40 | 6/6 | |
| DELLA protein, GAI1 | −2.71∼2.48 | 2/9 | −2.74∼2.13 | 7/11 | −2.77∼0.54 | 2/10 | |
| Fatty acids | 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase | −0.66∼2.94 | 4/8 | −0.94∼1.85 | 8/13 | −1.38∼1.37 | 6/12 |
| Acyl-lipid (8−3)-desaturase | 0.43∼3.64 | 6/6 | 1.21∼4.97 | 7/7 | 1.83∼3.71 | 6/6 | |
| Fatty acid desaturase 4 | 2.72∼4.06 | 2/2 | 3.51∼4.33 | 2/2 | 3.28∼4.11 | 2/2 | |
| Omega−3/6 fatty acid desaturase | −0.25∼0.87 | 3/4 | −0.77∼2.24 | 3/4 | 0.24∼2.31 | 6/6 | |
| Elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein | 1.98∼2.25 | 2/2 | −0.68∼3.33 | 2/3 | −0.25∼2.54 | 3/4 | |
| Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase | −0.56∼2.46 | 8/9 | −1.68∼4.70 | 9/20 | −3.37∼4.44 | 13/20 | |
| Sn1-specific diacylglycerol lipase | −0.73∼4.37 | 12/13 | 0.67∼4.59 | 10/10 | −0.77∼3.57 | 10/12 | |
| Putative lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 | 4.09∼5.80 | 2/2 | 4.03∼5.35 | 2/2 | 2.62∼4.31 | 2/2 | |
| Chalcone synthase | −0.64∼3.47 | 7/10 | −1.67∼5.46 | 19/20 | −2.47∼4.58 | 17/20 | |
| Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase | −0.37∼1.18 | 8/9 | −1.70∼2.64 | 8/13 | −2.22∼4.60 | 6/13 | |
| Flavonoid 3’-monooxygenase | −1.46∼0.55 | 3/7 | −3.98∼4.59 | 10/16 | −4.71∼4.43 | 8/13 | |
| Flavonoid 3’,5’-hydroxylase | −1.15∼1.44 | 5/13 | −6.30∼2.61 | 6/20 | −3.13∼2.11 | 3/21 | |
| GLABRA2 expression modulator | 5.63 | 1/1 | 4.26 | 1/1 | 4.13 | 1/1 | |
| Antioxidant enzymes | Peroxisomal catalase | 2.44 | 1/1 | 2.53∼2.98 | 2/2 | 1.74∼2.59 | 2/2 |
| Catalase | 0.15∼3.23 | 3/3 | −0.99∼4.53 | 3/5 | −2.13∼4.48 | 3/5 | |
| Glutaredoxin | 0.22∼3.14 | 7/7 | 0.87∼3.54 | 8/8 | 0.54∼2.89 | 7/7 | |
| Glutathione S-transferase | −1.64∼3.00 | 27/40 | −2.31∼3.01 | 25/50 | −6.98∼4.05 | 21/48 | |
| Glutathione synthetase | 1.05 | 1/1 | 2.09 | 1/1 | 0.60∼2.62 | 2/2 | |
| Endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin | 1.66∼3.42 | 4/4 | 0.75∼3.51 | 3/3 | 0.90∼2.63 | 3/3 | |
| Cytochrome c | 2.10∼2.43 | 2/2 | 3.17∼3.24 | 2/2 | 2.90∼2.94 | 2/2 | |
| Mitochondrial uncoupling protein | −0.76∼5.44 | 11/13 | −1.44∼4.93 | 10/12 | −1.84∼5.08 | 8/10 | |
| Protein DETOXIFICATION | −2.25∼3.27 | 18/24 | −2.86∼4.34 | 23/31 | −3.76∼4.24 | 20/31 | |
| Transcription factors | Ethylene-responsive transcription factor | −4.17∼8.81 | 68/83 | −2.80∼6.98 | 59/73 | −4.04∼5.16 | 36/58 |
| Dehydration-responsive element-binding protein | 2.77∼7.36 | 15/15 | −2.97∼6.24 | 13/15 | −2.87∼5.74 | 12/15 | |
| B-box zinc finger protein | 0.53∼5.47 | 10/10 | −3.14∼2.77 | 9/11 | −2.55∼3.26 | 8/10 | |
| Probable WRKY transcription factor | −1.97∼6.59 | 15/17 | −2.16∼5.56 | 13/15 | −2.77∼4.58 | 10/14 | |
| Transcription factor MYB | −2.35∼4.74 | 13/22 | −1.58∼4.58 | 20/23 | −1.74∼1.57 | 9/19 | |
| Other gene families | Beta-carotene 3-hydroxylase | 1.15∼6.85 | 4/4 | 2.17∼5.08 | 4/4 | 1.38∼5.52 | 4/4 |
| Beta-amylase | −1.15∼4.22 | 6/8 | −2.76∼5.15 | 6/8 | −2.84∼3.69 | 6/8 | |
| Desiccation stress protein | 3.33∼6.59 | 10/10 | 2.76∼6.78 | 10/10 | 1.12∼6.39 | 9/9 | |
| Senescence/dehydration-associated protein | 1.00∼8.37 | 16/16 | −0.32∼6.56 | 16/17 | −1.00∼6.17 | 2/16 | |
| E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase COP1 | 0.72∼3.02 | 8/8 | 0.35∼3.24 | 6/6 | −1.27∼2.54 | 5/6 | |
| Early light-induced protein | 3.48∼7.42 | 8/8 | 7.35∼7.71 | 8/8 | 7.51∼8.52 | 8/8 | |
| Hydrophobic protein RCI2A | 1.99∼4.10 | 3/3 | 2.88∼4.10 | 3/3 | 2.55∼2.81 | 3/3 | |
| Late embryogenesis abundant protein | 3.60∼6.25 | 14/14 | 2.55∼6.89 | 13/13 | 1.00∼6.91 | 12/12 | |
| Low temperature-induced protein | 0.97∼4.04 | 5/5 | 1.74∼5.41 | 5/5 | 0.73∼5.04 | 5/5 | |
| Probable plastidic glucose transporter | 2.01∼4.16 | 5/5 | 1.69∼3.28 | 5/5 | 0.69∼2.80 | 5/5 | |
| Probable vacuolar amino acid transporter | 2.10∼4.47 | 3/3 | −0.90∼4.65 | 4/5 | −1.20∼5.97 | 4/5 | |
| Protein SRC2 homolog | −0.52∼7.07 | 8/11 | −1.68∼5.55 | 8/11 | −2.95∼4.41 | 8/14 | |
| Translocator protein | 1.48 5.99 | 8/8 | −0.41∼5.98 | 8/9 | −0.40∼5.13 | 9/10 | |
| Low molecular mass early light-inducible protein | 4.11∼5.51 | 3/3 | 4.11∼6.29 | 3/3 | 5.24∼7.16 | 3/3 | |
| High molecular mass early light-inducible protein | 1.47∼7.54 | 14/14 | −2.24∼9.57 | 15/17 | −2.25∼10.22 | 13/16 | |
| Integrin-linked protein kinase | −1.17∼3.97 | 11/13 | −2.69∼2.32 | 8/12 | −2.24∼1.29 | 6/12 | |
| Novel genes related to cold stress | Membrane protein PM19L | −0.47∼6.36 | 10/11 | −1.75∼6.23 | 10/12 | −2.40∼5.02 | 9/14 |
| Transmembrane protein 53/205 | 0.33∼6.67 | 11/11 | 0.56∼6.50 | 11/11 | 0.63∼4.90 | 11/11 | |
| Acyltransferase-like protein | −0.40∼1.53 | 5/6 | 0.58∼3.72 | 5/5 | −1.50∼3.62 | 5/6 | |
| Polyprenol reductase | 2.87∼3.67 | 2/2 | 3.87∼2.66 | 2/2 | 2.12∼3.26 | 2/2 | |
| Ferritin−3 | 1.37∼2.22 | 4/4 | 2.21∼5.42 | 4/4 | 1.69∼3.84 | 4/4 | |
| Vacuolar iron transporter | 3.75∼4.01 | 3/3 | −0.82∼7.36 | 3/5 | 2.79∼5.04 | 3/3 | |
| Monosaccharide-sensing protein | 1.98∼5.58 | 4/4 | 2.07∼5.40 | 4/4 | 1.52∼4.93 | 4/4 | |
| Nitrate reductase | 3.95∼4.15 | 2/2 | 1.41∼2.00 | 2/2 | 1.27∼1.36 | 2/2 | |
| Protein MOTHER of FT and TFL1 | 1.94∼4.81 | 4/4 | 3.20∼4.81 | 4/4 | 2.41∼4.42 | 4/4 | |
| Protein DOG1-like 3 | 3.57∼6.61 | 4/4 | 2.48∼4.30 | 4/4 | 2.25∼3.37 | 4/4 | |
| Phospholipase A2-alpha | 3.88∼6.42 | 2/2 | 5.12∼7.35 | 2/2 | 5.41∼8.18 | 2/2 | |
FIGURE 6Genes involved in the biosynthesis pathways of very-long-chain fatty acids were upregulated under cold stress. (A) fatty acid desaturases (FAD), (B) β-keto-acyl-CoA synthase (KCS), (C) Jasmonate-Zim Domain (JAZ) proteins (JAZ), (D) 12-oxophytodienoate reductase (OPR), (E) LATERAL ORGAN BORDER DOMAIN 16 (LBD16), and (F) AP2/ERF transcription factor. Heatmaps show the gene expression profile at different time points of cold stress, which were markedly upregulated detected by transcriptome sequencing. As gene expression level increases, the color changes from green (low accumulation) to red (high accumulation). (G) A proposed model summarizing the main pathways for KCS gene expression and very-long-chain fatty acids biosynthesis under cold stress. (H) Several genes involved in the biosynthesis pathway of very-long-chain fatty acids were significantly upregulated under cold stress confirmed by qPCR analysis. Significant difference (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01).
FIGURE 7Genes involved in the biosynthesis pathways of flavonoids were upregulated under cold stress. (A) Proposed biosynthetic pathway of flavonoid synthesis in Pohlia nutans. Gene expression profile at different time points of cold stress. As gene expression level increases, the color changes from green (low accumulation) to red (high accumulation). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumarate CoA ligase 4 (4CL), chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), flavonol synthase (FLS), flavone synthase (FNS), UDP-flavonoid glucosyltransferase (UFGT). (B) Several flavonoid biosynthesis enzyme genes were markedly upregulated under cold stress detected by qPCR analysis. Significant difference (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01).