| Literature DB >> 36176553 |
Yunan Shen1, Heng Ni1, Jingfeng Li1, Zhenyu Jia1, Yuezhou Cao1, Haibin Shi1, Linbo Zhao1, Sheng Liu1.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Low-profile intracranial stents such as the LEO Baby stents are considered to be advantageous for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms originating from small arteries. This study aimed to evaluate the initial and mid-term clinical and angiographic results of LEO Baby stents in stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms with small parent arteries (<2.5 mm).Entities:
Keywords: coiling; embolization; intracranial aneurysms; low profile stent; small vessels
Year: 2022 PMID: 36176553 PMCID: PMC9513362 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.990532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Figure 1Decision-making chart for treatment options for patients with aneurysms.
Characteristics of 131 patients.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD | 59.9 ± 9.8 |
| Female sex ( | 73 (55.7) |
| Hypertension ( | 95 (72.5) |
| Smoking ( | 9 (6.9) |
| Diabetes ( | 16 (11.6) |
| Multiplicity of aneurysms ( | 43 (32.8) |
|
| |
| 0–2 | 126 (96.2) |
| ≥3 | 5 (3.8) |
|
| |
| I–II | 47 (73.4) |
| III–IV | 17 (26.6) |
*Evaluated in 64 patients with SAH.
SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Characteristics of 135 aneurysms.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Aneurysm size (mm), median (IQR) | 3.60(2.76, 5.10) |
| Neck size (mm), mean ± SD | 3.24 ± 1.28 |
| Wide (≥4 mm) | 35 (25.9) |
| Narrow (<4 mm) | 100 (74.1) |
| Parent-artery diameter (mm), median (IQR) | 1.95 (1.66, 2.21) |
|
| |
| Favorable (≥2) | 12 (8.9) |
| Unfavorable (<2) | 123 (91.1) |
| Distal ACA | 20 (14.8) |
| AComA | 44 (32.6) |
| MCA | 48 (35.5) |
| Fetal PComA | 15 (11.1) |
| PCA | 4 (3.0) |
| PICA | 2 (1.5) |
| VBA | 2 (1.5) |
| Tiny (<3 mm) | 32 (23.7) |
| Small (3–10 mm) | 99 (73.3) |
| Large (10–25 mm) | 3 (2.2) |
| Giant (> 25 mm) | 1 (0.7) |
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; ACA, anterior cerebral artery; AComA, anterior communicating artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PComA, posterior communicating artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; PICA, posterior inferior cerebellar artery; VBA, vertebrobasilar artery.
Evolution of aneurysm occlusion at first angiographic follow-up.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Class 1 | 111 (82.2) | 86 | 86 (100) | / | / |
| Class 2 | 19 (14.1) | 17 | 15 (88.2) | 1 (5.9) | 1 (5.9) |
| Class 3 | 5 (3.7) | 3 | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) |
| Total | 135 (100) | 106 | 102 (96.2) | 2 (1.9) | 2 (1.9) |
Figure 2A 64 years old female patient with an incidental fatal posterior communicating (PCom) artery aneurysm. Left internal carotid artery (ICA) angiography showed a PComA aneurysm with wide neck located at fatal posterior communicating artery (A). The aneurysm was coiled assisted by a Leo baby stent deployed in the PCom artery across the aneurysm neck. The proximal end of the stent covered the neck of the aneurysm satisfactorily and was detached in the ICA without touching the opposite wall (B). Immediate angiography after procedure showed a Raymond 3 occlusion (C). The patient was discharged without deficit. Follow-up angiography 6 months later showed a complete occlusion of the aneurysm and patent P-com aneurysm (D).
Figure 3A 59 years old male patient presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Left ICA angiogram showed an anterior communicating aneurysm with a daughter sac and a wide neck incorporating both A1/A2 junctions (A). The aneurysm was selected with a microcatheter for embolization from left A1, and a Leo baby stent was deployed from right A1 to left A2, crossing anterior communicating artery and covering the neck of the aneurysm (B,C). The immediate angiogram after embolization showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm and patent anterior cerebral artery (D). Follow-up angiography 6 months later showed in-stent stenosis without any symptom (E,F).
Comparison of clinical complications with previous studies of stent-assisted embolization of aneurysms located in small vessels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chung et al. ( | Enterprise | 31 | 16 | <2.0 | 3 (9.7) | 3 (9.7) | 0 | / | / |
| Kuhn et al. ( | Neuroform/ | 44 | 1 | ≤ 2.0 | 7 (15.9) | 6 (13.6) | 1 (2.3) | 0 | / |
| Kim et al. ( | LVIS Jr/Atlas | 66 | 0 | ≤ 2.0 | 10 (15.2) | 8 (12.1) | 2 (3.0) | 0 | 3 (4.5) |
| Santillan et al. ( | LVIS Jr | 35 | 10 | <2.5 | 5 (14.3) | 4 (11.4) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.9) |
| Alghamdi et al. ( | LVIS Jr | 43 | 3 | <3.5 | 3 (7.5) | 1 (2.5) | 2 (5.0) | 7 (17.5) | 2 (5.0) |
| Wang et al., ( | LVIS | 22 | 5 | <2.5 | 1 (4.5) | 0 | 1 (4.5) | 1 (4.5) | 0 |
| Current study | LEO Baby | 135 | 65 | <2.5 | 14 (10.7) | 13 (9.6) | 1 (0.7) | 11 (10.4) | 0 |