| Literature DB >> 36176444 |
Guanyu Yu1, Mengnan Xu1, Leqi Zhou1, Kuo Zheng1, Xiaoming Zhu1, Jinke Sui1, Cheng Xin1, Wenjun Chang2, Wei Zhang1, Fuao Cao1.
Abstract
Background: Phosphorylated Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) has been reported to be intimately involved in various malignant tumors. The effect of p-FAK on colorectal cancer (CRC) is still disputable. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of p-FAK in the prognosis of colorectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; immunohistochemistry; p-FAK; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36176444 PMCID: PMC9513477 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Characteristics of patients with CRC.
| Characteristics | Total ( | p-FAK expression |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (IHC score <110, | High (IHC score ≥110, | |||
| Age, mean ± SD (years) | 60.61 ± 12.33 | 60.31 ± 11.95 | 60.93 ± 12.71 | 0.453 |
| Sex, n (%) | ||||
| Male | 546 (60.1%) | 256 (55.3%) | 290 (65.2%) | 0.002 |
| Female | 362 (39.9%) | 207 (44.7%) | 155 (34.8%) | |
| Disease location, n (%) | ||||
| Rectal | 475 (52.3%) | 244 (52.7%) | 231 (51.9%) | 0.812 |
| Colon | 433 (47.7%) | 219 (47.3%) | 214 (48.1%) | |
| TNM stage, n (%) | ||||
| I | 138 (15.2%) | 71 (15.3%) | 67 (15.1%) | 0.700 |
| II | 461 (50.8%) | 229 (49.5%) | 232 (52.1%) | |
| III | 309 (34.0%) | 163 (35.2%) | 146 (32.8%) | |
| Differentiation grade, n (%) | ||||
| Well | 12 (1.3%) | 3 (0.6%) | 9 (2.0%) | 0.004 |
| Moderate | 773 (85.1%) | 411 (88.8%) | 362 (81.3%) | |
| Poor | 123 (13.5%) | 49 (10.6%) | 74 (16.6%) | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) | ||||
| No | 137 (15.1%) | 63 (13.6%) | 74 (16.6%) | 0.203 |
| Yes | 771 (84.9%) | 400 (86.4%) | 371 (83.4%) | |
| Resected lymph nodes, n (%) | ||||
| <12 | 200 (22.0%) | 114 (24.6%) | 86 (19.3%) | 0.054 |
| ≥12 | 708 (78.0%) | 349 (75.4%) | 359 (80.7%) | |
| Serum CEA, n (%) | ||||
| <5 ng/ml | 640 (70.5%) | 333 (71.9%) | 307 (69%) | 0.333 |
| ≥5 ng/ml | 268 (29.5%) | 130 (28.1%) | 138 (31%) | |
| Serum CA199, n (%) | ||||
| <37 U/ml | 795 (87.6%) | 410 (88.6%) | 385 (86.5%) | 0.368 |
| ≥37 U/ml | 112 (12.3%) | 52 (11.2%) | 60 (13.5%) | |
FIGURE 1p-FAK expression in CRC. (A) Bioinformatics analyses of PTK2 mRNA expression in normal tissue and CRC. (B) Representative images of IHC. Scalebar, 50 μm. (C) Comparison of IHC H-score among different colorectal pathological tissues. (D) Comparison of IHC H-score between different differentiation grades. (E) Comparison of IHC H-score between different TNM stages. The error bar represents the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) in CRC patients. HR, hazard ratio.
Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors in overall survival and disease-specific survival.
| Overall survival | Disease-specific survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) | p value | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | p value | |
| p-FAK expression | 0.004 | 0.007 | ||
| Low | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| High | 2.090 (1.265–3.452) | 2.004 (1.214–3.308) | ||
| Age (years) | 0.595 | 0.566 | ||
| <60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≥60 | 0.877 (0.540–1.425) | 0.868 (0.534–1.410) | ||
| Sex | 0.775 | 0.908 | ||
| Male | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Female | 1.075 (0.654–1.766) | 1.03 (0.628–1.687) | ||
| Disease location | 0.288 | 0.266 | ||
| Rectal | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Colon | 0.765 (0.466–1.255) | 0.755 (0.461–1.238) | ||
| TNM stage | 0.558 | 0.499 | ||
| I and II | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| III | 0.859 (0.518–1.426) | 0.839 (0.505–1.395) | ||
| Differentiation grade | 0.436 | 0.652 | ||
| Well and Moderate | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Poor | 0.767 (0.393–1.496) | 0.858 (0.442–1.667) | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.717 | 0.662 | ||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.873 (0.419–1.820) | 0.849 (0.407–1.771) | ||
| Resected lymph nodes | 0.076 | 0.204 | ||
| <12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≥12 | 0.569 (0.306–1.060) | 0.672 (0.364–1.240) | ||
| Serum CEA (ng/ml) | 0.109 | 0.081 | ||
| <5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≥5 | 0.659 (0.395–1.097) | 0.635 (0.381–1.058) | ||
| Serum CA199 (U/ml) | 0.819 | 0.785 | ||
| <37 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≥37 | 1.090 (0.395–1.097) | 1.108 (0.529–2.323) | ||
Reference group.
FIGURE 3Univariable subgroup analyses of overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) in CRC patients. The dotted line shows the hazard ratio for all patients.
FIGURE 4(A) Overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. (B) Overall survival and disease-free survival in stage II CRC patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. (C) Overall survival and disease-free survival in stage III CRC patients with adjuvant chemotherapy. HR, hazard ratio.
Effect of p-FAK expression on the prediction of chemotherapy response in CRC patients.
| Overall survival | Disease-specific survival | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low group total (events) | High group total (events) | HR (95%CI) |
|
| Low group (Events) | High group total (events) | HR (95%CI) |
|
| |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.963 | 0.925 | ||||||||
| Without | 63 (3) | 74 (6) | 1.913 (0.477–7.761) | 0.360 | 63 (6) | 74 (11) | 1.934 (0.483–7.746) | 0.352 | ||
| With | 400 (22) | 371 (38) | 2.275 (1.388–3.867) | <0.01 | 400 (70) | 371 (80) | 2.094 (1.236–3.546) | <0.01 | ||