Literature DB >> 36175674

Changes in microbiological spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic shoulder infections.

Paul Siegert1,2, Bernhard J H Frank3, Sebastian Simon3, Dominik Meraner4, Alexandra Pokorny-Olsen4, Julian Diepold5, Christian Wurnig4, Jochen G Hofstaetter3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a major concern in shoulder arthroplasty, which in some cases require two-stage exchange. While it was shown that low-virulence bacteria are the most isolated pathogens in shoulder PJI, little is known about changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns during two-stage revision.
METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients (n = 25) who received a two-stage revision from January 2011 to December 2020 for shoulder PJI in one institution. Microbiological spectrum, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and re-revision rates of culture positive first- and second-stage procedures were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 29.7 months (range 8; 115 months). At final follow-up, subjective shoulder value (SSV) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and satisfaction with the surgery were assessed.
RESULTS: In 25 patients, a total of 54 2-stage exchange procedures were performed and positive cultures were obtained in 36 of these surgeries (66.7%). A total of 7 out of 25 patients (28.0%) showed a positive microbiological culture at first and second stages. In those patients, the mean time between first and second stages was 30.9 weeks (range 6; 70). Three out of those seven patients (42.9%) had a polymicrobial spectrum with one microorganism persistent at stage two, including Cutibacterium acnes (n = 1) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) (n = 2). In all these cases, antimicrobial resistance patterns changed. All cultures with monomicrobial spectrum (n = 4) at first stage showed a changed spectrum. Patients with positive first- and second-stage revisions showed a mean SSV of 49.3% ± 23.5 versus 52.9% ± 29.5 in single positive patients (p = 0.76). Re-revision was performed in five cases, two of those in patients with positive first- and second-stage cultures.
CONCLUSION: There is a high rate of changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns between culture positive first- and second-stage procedures as well as subsequent re-revisions. Intraoperative samples during reimplantation should be taken and resistance reconsidered in case of re-revision.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microbiological spectrum; Resistance pattern; Shoulder periprosthetic joint infection

Year:  2022        PMID: 36175674     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04635-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  17 in total

1.  Proceedings from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections: the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection.

Authors:  Grant E Garrigues; Benjamin Zmistowski; Alexus M Cooper; Andrew Green
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Glenoid vault and humeral head alignment in relation to the scapular blade axis in young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head.

Authors:  Doruk Akgün; Paul Siegert; Victor Danzinger; Fabian Plachel; Marvin Minkus; Kathi Thiele; Philipp Moroder
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel B Buchalter; Siddharth A Mahure; Brent Mollon; Stephen Yu; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Frailty Transitions One Year After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Johnson; Ryan D Frank; Matthew P Abdel; Elizabeth B Habermann; Alanna M Chamberlain; Carlos B Mantilla
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score.

Authors:  Michael K Gilbart; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Shoulder Arthroplasties: Diagnostic and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Florian Sevelda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Periprosthetic shoulder infection: an overview.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonnevialle; Florence Dauzères; Julien Toulemonde; Fanny Elia; Jean-Michel Laffosse; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 8.  Does exchange arthroplasty of an infected shoulder prosthesis provide better eradication rate and better functional outcome, compared to a permanent spacer or resection arthroplasty? a systematic review.

Authors:  D A George; A Volpin; S Scarponi; F S Haddad; C L Romanò
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.