| Literature DB >> 36172007 |
Kalliopi Domvri1, Savvas Petanidis2,3, Paul Zarogoulidis4, Doxakis Anestakis5, Charalampos Charalampidis5, Drosos Tsavlis6, Haidong Huang7, Lutz Freitag8, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt9, Dimitris Matthaios10, Theodora Katopodi2, Konstantinos Porpodis3.
Abstract
Introduction: Tumor immunotherapy is a key therapeutic paradigm for the treatment of several malignancies. However, in metastatic lung cancer, classical immunotherapy regimes are ineffective due to regulatory T cell (Treg)-related immunosuppression and tumor relapse. Materials: To address this issue, we designed specific biocompatible Treg-targeted nanocarriers (NCs) as a model of immune-based nanotherapy, in order to target Treg-related immunosuppression in the lung tumor microenvironment. This is achieved through the combination of Dasatinib and Epacadostat integrated into biodegradable nanosomes which can inhibit and reverse Treg-supporting immunosuppression. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence analysis, PET/CT scan, PTT/PA imaging and the Balb/c tumor model were used to explore the anti-tumor effect of Treg-targeted NCs both in vitro and in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: T cells; Tregs; immunosuppression; metastasis; nanosomes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36172007 PMCID: PMC9512414 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S346341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 3Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution analysis. (A) IR thermographic images of the CuS/EPDA nanosomes dispersed in PBS and irradiated with the 970 nm laser (1Wcm−2) for 10 min (scale bar, 50 nm). (B) Ki67 and Cyto Calcein staining of the intravenously injected CuS/EPDA NCs in BALB/c mice. Images were captured using Carl Zeiss fluorescence confocal microscope. Data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments (Scale bar, 100 μm). (C) Blood circulation curve of the intravenously injected CuS/EPDA NCs in BALB/c mice. (D) Quantitative biodistribution analysis of CuS/EPDA NCs in BALB/c mice by measuring the Cy5. 5 fluorescence intensity in major organs at different time points post-injection. Data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments. Statistically significant data are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ns, not significant). (E) Quantitative concentration analysis of CuS and CuS/EPDA NCs in tumor area by measuring the Cy5.5 fluorescence intensity at different time points post-injection. (F) Eliminating rate curve of intravenously injected CuS/EPDA NCs according to the concentration (C) over time (T) relationship. The blue and red indicators represent the first and the second time points respectively. (G) Stability of CuS/EPDA NCs after air exposure for 1–30 days. The NCs were dispersed in PBS and stored in room temperature for different periods of time.
Detailed Pharmacokinetic Analysis of CuS/EPDA NCs in Blood
| Blood Pharmacokinetics Analysis of CuS/EPDA NCs. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | T1/2 (h) | AUC (μg/h/mL) | Cmax (μg/mL) | CL (mL/h/kg) | Vd (mL/kg) |
| CuS/EPDA | 3.547 | 38.27 | 12.56 | 2.86 | 21.52 |
| Epacadostat | 1.620 | 11.42 | 8.19 | 31.74 | 68.05 |
Note: The results represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 4Assessment of intratumoral immune responses in vivo. (A) Infiltration of monocytic MDSC (Ly6C) subsets in M1/M2 macrophage regions post treatment with CuS/EPDA NCs. (B) Percentage of Ly6C+ infiltrated cells. Data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistically significant data are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). (C) Expression analysis of tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ Tregs in mice following treatment with CuS/EPDA NCs. (D) Percentage of Treg cells in CD4+ T cell population. The results represent the mean± SD of three independent experiments. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistically significant data are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). (E) The CD8+T/Tregs ratio analysis of the intravenously injected CuS/EPDA NCs in BALB/c mice. Statistically significant data are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). (F and G) Expression analysis of IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells in lung tissues following treatment with CuS and CuS/EPDA NCs. Data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistically significant data are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 5In vivo therapeutic efficacy against A549 tumor xenografts. (A) Characteristic photos of excised tumors from mice after treatment with CuS and CuS/EPDA NCs (5–10 mg/kg). (B) Comparative tumor volume assessment of A549 tumor bearing mice following treatment. (C) In vivo metastatic analysis of lymph node metastasis from control and CuS/EPDA NC-treated groups. Images showed representative lymph node metastatic foci highlighted in yellow color from different groups. (D) Statistical analysis of the number of metastatic foci of each group. (E) Survival rates of tumor-bearing mice after a 60-day tumor challenge in each group. Data were given as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Mean values and error bars are defined as mean and SD, respectively. (F) Representative photographs of excised tumors from mice after intravenous treatment with CuS/EPDA NCs (scale bar,1 cm). (G) Relative tumor volumes (V/V0) of A549 tumor bearing mice following intravenous administration. Data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).