Literature DB >> 36171933

Monitoring endotracheal tube cuff pressure using a blood pressure manometer.

Summit Bloria1, Rajeev Chauhan1, Ankur Luthra1, Pallavi Bloria2, Ketan Kataria1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36171933      PMCID: PMC9511862          DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_406_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0970-9185


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Endotracheal tube (ETT) hyperinflation can cause ischemia of tracheal mucosa, postoperative sore throat and many other complications.[12] The recommended ETT cuff pressure is between 30 and 40 cm of water.[3] Most of the times, ETT cuff is measured intermittently using cuff manometers. Many authors have suggested the continuous measurement of ETT cuff pressure.[4] However, the cuff manometers and other devices for continuous measurement of ETT cuff pressure are not available at all places. Subjective measures of cuff pressure like palpation of pilot balloon have been proven to be ineffective. We describe a method we use to rule out over-inflation of ETT cuff using a blood administration set and a blood pressure manometer, devices which are easily available in all operation theater settings. The rubber injection port and male fitting connector of a blood administration set (Umaflow; Royal Surgicare, Gujarat, India) are removed from the blood administration set and connected to a blood pressure manometer at the site of BP tubing connection. At the other end of the male fitting connector, a 3-way connector (BD Connecta™, Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Systems, Mexico) is attached [Figure 1].
Figure 1

Connecting injection port of IV set to the BP manometer

Connecting injection port of IV set to the BP manometer The one way valve of pilot balloon of ETT can be connected to the other end of the 3 way and ETT cuff determined. However, we must remember that the BP manometer shows readings in mm of Mercury (Hg) and they need to be converted to cm of water using the formula, 1 mmHg = 1.35 cm of water. Hence, if we want an ETT cuff pressure of 35 cm of water, we need to have a cuff reading of around 25 mm of Hg. Using the third port of the 3 way, a 10 cc syringe can be used to inflate the ETT cuff while simultaneously measuring the ETT cuff pressure [Figure 2].
Figure 2

ETT cuff being inflated using a 10 cc syringe while measuring cuff pressure using BP manometer

ETT cuff being inflated using a 10 cc syringe while measuring cuff pressure using BP manometer This may be used as a rough guide to prevent both hyperinflation and hypoinflation of ETT cuff. Goyal et al. in a study had used a very similar modification and suggested that improvised monitors to measure endotracheal tube cuff pressure worked as well as commercially available cuff monitors.[5]In addition, this method can be used for continuous measurement of endotracheal tube cuff pressure both in operation theaters and ICUs.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Correlations between controlled endotracheal tube cuff pressure and postprocedural complications: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jianhui Liu; Xiaoqing Zhang; Wei Gong; Shitong Li; Fen Wang; Shukun Fu; Mazhong Zhang; Yannan Hang
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Assessment of safe endotracheal tube cuff pressures in emergency care - time for change?

Authors:  Christopher Stein; Gary Berkowitz; Efraim Kramer
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2011-03-01

3.  Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Monitoring in Peripheral Hospitals.

Authors:  R Goyal; G Kumar; M R Waghray
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  A simple and widely available alternative method for endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Jong Bun Kim; Jae Myeong Lee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Endotracheal tube cuff pressure in three hospitals, and the volume required to produce an appropriate cuff pressure.

Authors:  Papiya Sengupta; Daniel I Sessler; Paul Maglinger; Spencer Wells; Alicia Vogt; Jaleel Durrani; Anupama Wadhwa
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.