| Literature DB >> 36171587 |
Gaia Spinetti1, Carlo Maria Ferdinando Caravaggi2, Andrea Panunzi3, Fabiana Madotto4, Elena Sangalli5, Federica Riccio5, Adriana Barbara Sganzaroli3, Paolo Galenda3, Amelia Bertulessi3, Maria Francesca Barmina3, Ornella Ludovico3,6, Orazio Fortunato7, Francesco Setacci8, Flavio Airoldi9, Davide Tavano9, Laura Giurato10, Marco Meloni10, Luigi Uccioli11, Antonino Bruno12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell therapy with autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) may help restore limb perfusion in patients with diabetes mellitus and critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) deemed not eligible for revascularization procedures and consequently at risk for major amputation (no-option). Fundamental is to establish its clinical value and to identify candidates with a greater benefit over time. Assessing the frequency of PB circulating angiogenic cells and extracellular vesicles (EVs) may help in guiding candidate selection.Entities:
Keywords: Autologous cell therapy; Critical limb-threatening ischemia; Diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36171587 PMCID: PMC9516816 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-022-01629-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 8.949
Fig. 1Panel A. Representative pictures of a clinical case of PB-MNCs therapy and right Chopart Amputation. From left to right: (i) before therapy; (ii) at the time of the 1st intramuscular PB-MNCs treatment; (iii) ulcer healing. Panel B. TcPO2 values in study population stratified by healing without a major amputation after 1 year. The grey box represents patients with healing and the white box represents patients without healing at 1-year follow-up. *Comparison between groups, p-value < 0.05. Panel C. Representative angiograms of two no-option CLTI diabetic patients. From left to right: (i) patient after unsuccessfully PTA (TcPO2 < 30 mmHg) before PB-MNCs therapy showing the typical “desert” foot condition; (ii) patient after 2 months from PB-MNCs therapy showing collateral vascular remodeling. Panel D. Relative abundance of CD34+ and CD34+CXCR4+ cell subpopulations during PB-MNCs therapy stratified by TcPO2 values observed after the last PB-MNCs treatment (< 40 mmHg; ≥ 40 mmHg). The grey box represents patients with high levels of TcPO2 (≥ 40 mmHg) and the white box represents patients with low levels (< 40 mmHg). Panel E. Extracellular vesicles size distribution according to TcPO2 levels after the last PB-MNCs treatment (< 40 mmHg; ≥ 40 mmHg)
Demographic, clinical, and ulcer characteristics after foot surgical procedure
| Study population | |
|---|---|
| N | 50 |
| Males, n (%) | 31 (62.0) |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 75.2 ± 10.0 |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 50 (100.0) |
| Duration of diabetes (years), mean ± SD | 21.0 ± 8.6 |
| Ischemic heart disease, n (%) | 29 (58.0) |
| PB-MNCs treatments, n (%) | |
| 1 | 12 (24.0) |
| 2 | 10 (20.0) |
| 3 | 28 (56.0) |
| Ulcer characteristic | |
| Right limb, n (%) | 23 (46.0) |
| Dimension > 5 cm2, n (%) | 50 (100.0) |
| Infection, n (%) | 20 (40.0) |
| Gangrene, n (%) | 50 (100.0) |
| Osteomyelitis, n (%) | 30 (60.0) |
| Heel location, n (%) | 7 (14.0) |
| Distribution of arterial lesions and vascular findings | |
| Vessels affected, mean ± SD | 3.8 ± 1.8 |
| Iliac arteries, n (%) | 1 (2.0) |
| CFA, n (%) | 3 (6.0) |
| Profunda artery, n (%) | 2 (4.0) |
| SFA, n (%) | 28 (56.0) |
| Popliteal artery, n (%) | 20 (40.0) |
| TPT, n (%) | 8 (16.0) |
| ATA, n (%) | 40 (80.0) |
| Peroneal artery, n (%) | 22 (44.0) |
| PTA, n (%) | 40 (80.0) |
| Pedidialartery, n (%) | 12 (24.0) |
| Plantar arteries, n (%) | 12 (24.0) |
ATA anterior tibial artery, CFA common femoral artery, PB-MNCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PTA posterior tibial artery, SD standard deviation, SFA superficial femoral artery, TPT tibiperoneal trunk
Clinical outcomes occurred during follow-up
| Study population (n = 50) | |
|---|---|
| At 1 year | |
| Dead, n (%) | 16 (32.0) |
| Major amputation, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 8 (16.0) |
| Alive at 1 year (n = 34) | 7 (20.6) |
| Ulcer healing, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 22 (44.0) |
| Alive at 1 year (n = 34) | 21 (61.8) |
| Ulcer healing without a major amputation, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 17 (34.0) |
| Alive at 1 year (n = 34) | 16 (47.1) |
| Estimated* time to healing without a major amputation (days), mean ± SE | 257 ± 17 |
| At the end of follow-up | |
| Follow-up time (years), median [IQR] | 1.46 [0.55–2.01] |
| Dead, n (%) | 24 (48.0) |
| Major amputation, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 9 (18.0) |
| Alive at the end of follow-up (n = 26) | 5 (19.3) |
| Walking capability, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 30 (60.0) |
| Alive at the end of follow-up (n = 26) | 23 (88.5) |
| Ulcer healing, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 30 (60.0) |
| Alive at the end of follow-up (n = 26) | 23 (88.5) |
| Ulcer healing without a major amputation, n (%) | |
| All patients (n = 50) | 25 (50.0) |
| Alive at the end of follow-up (n = 26) | 19 (73.1) |
| Estimated* time to healing without a major amputation (days), mean ± SE | 345 ± 39 |
IQR interquartile range [1st quartile-3rd quartile], SE standard error
*Time was estimated with Kaplan–Meier approach, considering deaths and drop-out as censored
Cellular and molecular characterization at enrollment, stratifying study population according to TcPO2 levels after the last PB-MNCs treatment (< 40 mmHg; ≥ 40 mmHg)
| TcPO2 levels | Comparison, p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| < 40 mmHg | ≥ 40 mmHg | ||
| N (%) | 21 (42.0) | 29 (58.0) | – |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 78.67 ± 8.78 | 72.69 ± 10.24 | 0.0522 |
| Males, n (%) | 12 (57.14) | 19 (65.52) | 0.5471 |
| PB-MNCs treatments, n (%) | |||
| 1 | 12 (57.14) | 0 (0.00) | |
| 2 | 1 (4.76) | 10 (34.48) | |
| 3 | 8 (38.10) | 19 (65.52) | |
| TcPO2, mean ± SD | |||
| At enrollment | 16.48 ± 11.54 | 17.72 ± 11.74 | 0.5588 |
| After the last PB-MNCs treatment | 17.10 ± 12.20 | 55.07 ± 9.73 | |
| PB cell frequency*, mean ± SD | |||
| CD34+ | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 0.30 ± 0.21 | 0.7215 |
| CD34+CXCR4+ | 40.56 ± 19.78 | 44.06 ± 11.48 | 0.2880 |
| EVs‡, mean ± SD | |||
| EV size (nm) | 195.59 ± 29.74 | 136.31 ± 27.41 | |
| Total EV concentration (ml × 1010) | 3.50 ± 1.20 | 3.62 ± 1.72 | 0.9728 |
| Small EV (30-100 nM) (%) | 4.0 ± 5.0 | 33.0 ± 18.0 | |
EVs extracellular vesicles, PB peripheral blood, PB-MNCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells, SD standard deviation
*CD34+ was not available for 5 patients (10%) s, CD34+CXCR4+ for 10 patients (20%). ‡ EV (30-100 nM) evaluation was performed on 22 patients (44%)
P-values < 0.05 are displayed in bold