Jessie Fuoco1, Mei Dong2, Christina MacMillan3, Ipshita Kak4, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez5, Grace Bradley1,6, Wei Xu2, Marco Magalhaes7,8. 1. Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology & Oral Medicine, University of Toronto, 457-124 Edward Street, M5G 1G6, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology & Oral Medicine, University of Toronto, 457-124 Edward Street, M5G 1G6, Toronto, ON, Canada. Marco.Magalhaes@dentistry.utoronto.ca. 8. Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Marco.Magalhaes@dentistry.utoronto.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Salivary gland tumors (SGT) are a diverse group of neoplasms arising from the major and minor glands. The oral cavity is the most common site for minor SGT (IMSGT), and these lesions frequently pose a challenge to the pathologist due to overlapping histopathological features and limited material for analysis. Our objective was to determine specific clinical and histopathological features associated with challenges in IMSGT diagnoses and pathologists' agreement. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 248 IMSGT received between 2010 and 2019. We evaluated the diagnostic challenge of the cases by stratifying according to whether a definitive, favored, or indeterminate (challenging) diagnosis was provided. Inter-observer agreement and concordance of biopsy diagnoses with the final diagnoses after tumor resection were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 248 biopsies, 191 had a definitive diagnosis, 38 favored diagnoses, and 19 were indeterminate. The predominant diagnoses considered for the indeterminate category were pleomorphic adenoma/myoepithelioma (PA), polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), and low-grade adenocarcinoma. Using multivariate analysis of clinical features, younger patient age, smaller tumor size, and larger biopsy size increased the likelihood of a definitive diagnosis (p = 0.014, p = 0.037, p = 0.012). The inter-observer agreement for 68 representative cases was moderate overall (Fleiss's Kappa 0.575) and good for the 40 cases with a definitive diagnosis (Fleiss's Kappa 0.66). Sixty-five biopsy diagnoses were matched with corresponding tumor resection diagnoses and found to show a good concordance (Cramer's V test 0.76). The discordant diagnoses predominantly involved PA, carcinoma exPA, PAC, AdCC, and adenocarcinoma NOS. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic challenges in IMSGT incisional biopsies were infrequent, especially if multiple pathologists were consulted. PA, PAC, AdCC, and adenocarcinoma NOS were the histologic types more commonly posing diagnostic challenges. Younger patient age, smaller tumor size, and larger biopsy are associated with a definitive diagnosis. This data highlights the importance of appropriate sampling in IMSGT.
BACKGROUND: Salivary gland tumors (SGT) are a diverse group of neoplasms arising from the major and minor glands. The oral cavity is the most common site for minor SGT (IMSGT), and these lesions frequently pose a challenge to the pathologist due to overlapping histopathological features and limited material for analysis. Our objective was to determine specific clinical and histopathological features associated with challenges in IMSGT diagnoses and pathologists' agreement. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 248 IMSGT received between 2010 and 2019. We evaluated the diagnostic challenge of the cases by stratifying according to whether a definitive, favored, or indeterminate (challenging) diagnosis was provided. Inter-observer agreement and concordance of biopsy diagnoses with the final diagnoses after tumor resection were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 248 biopsies, 191 had a definitive diagnosis, 38 favored diagnoses, and 19 were indeterminate. The predominant diagnoses considered for the indeterminate category were pleomorphic adenoma/myoepithelioma (PA), polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), and low-grade adenocarcinoma. Using multivariate analysis of clinical features, younger patient age, smaller tumor size, and larger biopsy size increased the likelihood of a definitive diagnosis (p = 0.014, p = 0.037, p = 0.012). The inter-observer agreement for 68 representative cases was moderate overall (Fleiss's Kappa 0.575) and good for the 40 cases with a definitive diagnosis (Fleiss's Kappa 0.66). Sixty-five biopsy diagnoses were matched with corresponding tumor resection diagnoses and found to show a good concordance (Cramer's V test 0.76). The discordant diagnoses predominantly involved PA, carcinoma exPA, PAC, AdCC, and adenocarcinoma NOS. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic challenges in IMSGT incisional biopsies were infrequent, especially if multiple pathologists were consulted. PA, PAC, AdCC, and adenocarcinoma NOS were the histologic types more commonly posing diagnostic challenges. Younger patient age, smaller tumor size, and larger biopsy are associated with a definitive diagnosis. This data highlights the importance of appropriate sampling in IMSGT.
Authors: Marco Guzzo; Laura D Locati; Franz J Prott; Gemma Gatta; Mark McGurk; Lisa Licitra Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 6.312