| Literature DB >> 36171031 |
Zeyang Yu1, Tian-Tian Zhang1, Xiaomeng Wang1, Qinxue Chang1, Huijie Huang1, Honglu Zhang1, Desheng Song1, Maohe Yu2, Jie Yang3, Yuanyuan Liu1, Changping Li1, Zhuang Cui4, Jun Ma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The HIV epidemic in key populations such as men who have sex with men (MSM) is a public health issue of worldwide concern. China has seen an increase in newly diagnosed HIV infections through male-male sexual contact in the past decade. In a long-term cohort, how the complex behaviour pattern of MSM changed and the association with the HIV risk are unclear at present.Entities:
Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; HIV & AIDS; Infectious disease/HIV
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36171031 PMCID: PMC9528664 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 3.006
Characteristics and sexual behaviours at baseline for MSM with HIV infection or negative HIV test
| Variables at baseline | Total N (%) | HIV infection N (%) | HIV negative N (%) |
| Age | |||
| <45 | 1504 (74.13) | 96 (75.59) | 1408 (74.03) |
| 45–60 | 464 (22.87) | 27 (21.16) | 437 (22.98) |
| >60 | 61 (3.01) | 4 (3.15) | 57 (3.00) |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 947 (46.67) | 70 (55.12) | 877 (46.11) |
| Unmarried | 1082 (53.33) | 57 (44.88) | 1025 (53.89) |
| Education | |||
| Below high school | 56 (2.76) | 5 (3.94) | 51 (2.68) |
| High school | 1172 (57.76) | 90 (70.87) | 1082 (56.89) |
| College or more | 801 (39.48) | 32 (25.20) | 769 (40.43) |
| Residence time in Tianjin | |||
| <3 months | 405 (19.96) | 41 (32.28) | 364 (19.14) |
| 3–7 months | 39 (1.92) | 2 (1.57) | 37 (1.74) |
| 7–12 months | 41 (2.02) | 5 (3.94) | 36 (1.89) |
| 1–2 years | 86 (4.24) | 2 (1.57) | 84 (72.61) |
| >2 years | 1458 (71.86) | 77 (60.63) | 1381 (72.61) |
| Condom use in last anal sex | |||
| Yes | 1550 (76.39) | 78 (61.42) | 1472 (77.39) |
| No | 479 (23.61) | 49 (38.58) | 430 (22.61) |
| Frequency of condom use during anal sex*† | |||
| Consistent use | 785 (38.69) | 43 (33.86) | 742 (39.01) |
| Inconsistent use | 1244 (61.31) | 84 (66.14) | 1160 (60.99) |
| Number of sexual partners† | |||
| <10 | 1709 (84.23) | 116 (91.34) | 1593 (83.75) |
| More than 10 | 320 (15.77) | 11 (8.66) | 309 (16.25) |
| STI† | |||
| Yes | 68 (3.35) | 2 (1.57) | 66 (3.47) |
| No | 1961 (96.65) | 125 (98.43) | 1836 (96.53) |
| Inject drugs† | |||
| Yes | 22 (1.08) | 2 (1.57) | 20 (1.05) |
| No | 2007 (98.92) | 125 (98.43) | 1882 (98.94) |
| Accept health service‡ | |||
| Yes | 938 (46.23) | 53 (41.73) | 885 (46.50) |
| No | 1091 (53.77) | 74 (58.27) | 1017 (53.50) |
| MSW§† | |||
| Yes | 102 (5.03) | 5 (3.94) | 97 (5.10) |
| No | 1927 (94.97) | 122 (96.06) | 1805 (94.90) |
*The frequency of condom use during anal sex in the past 6 months was divided into two categories: consistent use (when engaging in anal intercourse, condoms were used in more than 80% of cases and condoms were used throughout the sex) and inconsistent use (other cases).
†In the past 6 months.
‡Health service represented whether participants had accepted any HIV-related health service (HIV testing, condom distribution, HIV risk-reducing consult, peer education or HIV infection risk assessment) in the past 12 months.
§MSW represented the participants who have been obtaining money or goods through sexual activity.
MSM, men who have sex with men; MSW, male sex worker; STI, sexually transmitted infection.
Figure 1HIV incidence rates by year. When calculating the incidence rate, the numerator was the number of HIV infections in each year and the denominator was the sum of the total actual survival time of each participant in this year. The first people newly diagnosed with HIV occurred in 2012, though the study started in 2011.
Figure 2Heatmap of HIV incidence rates among MSM with different follow-up times. MSM with two follow-up times represented the participants whose number of total follow-up times was 2, and so on. Participants were divided into subgroups according to the number of their total follow-up times. The calculation of HIV incidence rate was done within each subgroup. Values and colours indicated HIV incidence rate per 100 PY (for example, in (A), 0.37 that represented the HIV incidence rate in ‘protective’ to ‘protective’ group was 0.37 per 100 PY). The lighter colour indicates that the HIV incidence rate was lower for MSM in that subgroup, whereas the darker colour indicates a higher incidence rate in that subgroup. MSM, men who have sex with men; PY, person-year.
Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates for HIV infection
| HIV infection risk models* | Per 1-risk indicator increase† | Sexual behaviour type | ||
| Protective | Moderate | Fragile | ||
| HR (95% CI) | 3.68 (3.03 to 4.46) | Reference | 2.38 (1.12 to 5.02) | 19.74 (10.28 to 37.91) |
| Adjusted HR (95% CI)‡ | 3.37 (2.76 to 4.11) | Reference | 2.22 (1.05 to 4.71) | 16.53 (8.57 to 31.88) |
*All follow-up records of each participant were included into the model in counting process format.
†The number of risk indicators was in the range of 0–3. Per 1-risk indicator increase meant that the number of indicators was included into the model as a continuous variable.
‡Multivariable Cox regression analysis was adjusted for age, education, marital status, residence time in Tianjin and MSW.
MSW, male sex worker.
Figure 3Percentage of behaviour type in each visit. Values and area of the rectangles indicated percentage of behaviour type in each visit (for example, 31.69, which represented the percentage of ‘protective’ behaviour type, was 31.69% at baseline).
Behaviour changes and association with the risk of HIV infection between baseline and the last follow-up
| Behaviour changes* | HIV infection status (N, %) | Univariate Cox regression analysis | Multivariable Cox regression analysis† | |||||
| Negative | HIV | HR | 95% CI | P value | aHR | 95% CI | P value | |
| Change in risk indicators | ||||||||
| Lost 2–3 indicators | 236 (12.4) | 7 (5.5) | 0.56 | 0.25 to 1.27 | 0.1680 | 0.57 | 0.25 to 1.29 | 0.1822 |
| Lost 1 indicator | 525 (27.6) | 9 (7.1) | 0.41 | 0.19 to 0.86 | 0.0182 | 0.43 | 0.21 to 0.90 | 0.0251 |
| No change in indicators | 725 (38.1) | 30 (23.6) | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Gained 1 indicator | 325 (17.1) | 48 (37.8) | 2.82 | 1.78 to 4.46 | 0.0001 | 2.67 | 1.68 to 4.24 | 0.0001 |
| Gained 2–3 indicators | 91 (4.8) | 33 (26.0) | 6.13 | 3.73 to 10.08 | 0.0001 | 4.99 | 3.00 to 8.31 | 0.0001 |
| Behaviour transition type | ||||||||
| Consistently protective | 318 (16.7) | 2 (1.6) | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Protective to moderate | 210 (11.0) | 11 (8.7) | 4.78 | 1.18 to 19.26 | 0.0275 | 4.79 | 1.18 to 19.47 | 0.0283 |
| Protective to fragile | 77 (4.0) | 25 (19.7) | 28.76 | 7.66 to 108.05 | 0.0001 | 23.03 | 6.02 to 88.13 | 0.0001 |
| Moderate to protective | 301 (16.0) | 1 (0.8) | 0.64 | 0.08 to 5.03 | 0.6703 | 0.65 | 0.08 to 5.16 | 0.6912 |
| Consistently moderate | 315 (16.6) | 4 (3.1) | 1.62 | 0.33 to 7.84 | 0.5449 | 1.52 | 0.31 to 7.41 | 0.6019 |
| Moderate to fragile | 109 (5.7) | 33 (26.0) | 34.32 | 9.27 to 127.06 | 0.0001 | 25.48 | 6.79 to 95.40 | 0.0001 |
| Fragile to protective | 219 (11.5) | 7 (5.5) | 2.95 | 0.68 to 12.67 | 0.1457 | 2.87 | 0.66 to 12.46 | 0.1590 |
| Fragile to moderate | 237 (12.5) | 7 (5.5) | 3.06 | 0.71 to 13.17 | 0.1316 | 2.66 | 0.61 to 11.53 | 0.1906 |
| Consistently fragile | 116 (6.1) | 37 (29.1) | 31.43 | 8.53 to 115.75 | 0.0001 | 25.86 | 6.92 to 96.57 | 0.0001 |
| Total | 1902 | 127 | ||||||
*Two time points (baseline and the last follow-up) were opted to evaluate behaviour changes.
†Multivariable Cox regression analysis was adjusted for age, education, marital status, residence time in Tianjin and MSW.
aHR, adjusted HR; MSW, male sex worker.