Literature DB >> 36170564

Preoperative exercise training for people with non-small cell lung cancer.

Catherine Granger1,2, Vinicius Cavalheri3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) offers the best chance of cure, but it is associated with a risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. It is unclear if preoperative exercise training, and the potential resultant improvement in exercise capacity, may improve postoperative outcomes. This review updates our initial 2017 systematic review.
OBJECTIVES: 1. To evaluate the benefits and harm of preoperative exercise training on postoperative outcomes, such as the risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication and the postoperative duration of intercostal catheter, in adults scheduled to undergo lung resection for NSCLC. 2. To determine the effect on length of hospital stay (and costs associated with postoperative hospital stay), fatigue, dyspnoea, exercise capacity, lung function and postoperative mortality. SEARCH
METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was from 28 November 2016 to 23 November 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which study participants who were scheduled to undergo lung resection for NSCLC were allocated to receive either preoperative exercise training or no exercise training. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication; 2. postoperative duration of intercostal catheter and 3. SAFETY: Our secondary outcomes were 1. postoperative length of hospital stay; 2. postintervention fatigue; 3. postintervention dyspnoea; 4. postintervention and postoperative exercise capacity; 5. postintervention lung function and 6. postoperative mortality. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN
RESULTS: Along with the five RCTs included in the original version, we identified an additional five RCTs, resulting in 10 RCTs involving 636 participants. Preoperative exercise training results in a large reduction in the risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication compared to no preoperative exercise training (risk ratio (RR) 0.45, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.61; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 573 participants; high-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about its effect on postoperative intercostal catheter duration (MD -2.07 days, 95% CI -4.64 to 0.49; I2 = 77%, 3 studies, 111 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Preoperative exercise training is likely safe as studies reported no adverse events. Preoperative exercise training likely results in a reduction in postoperative length of hospital stay (MD -2.24 days, 95% CI -3.64 to -0.85; I2 = 85%; 9 studies, 573 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Preoperative exercise training likely increases postintervention exercise capacity measured by peak oxygen consumption (MD 3.36 mL/kg/minute, 95% CI 2.70 to 4.02; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 191 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but the evidence is very uncertain about its effect on postintervention exercise capacity measured by the 6-minute walk distance (MD 29.55 m, 95% CI 12.05 to 47.04; I2 = 90%; 6 studies, 474 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Preoperative exercise training may result in little to no effect on postintervention lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second: MD 5.87% predicted, 95% CI 4.46 to 7.28; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 197 participants; low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative exercise training results in a large reduction in the risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication compared to no preoperative exercise training for people with NSCLC. It may also reduce postoperative length of hospital stay, and improve exercise capacity and lung function in people undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. The findings of this review should be interpreted with caution due to risk of bias. Research investigating the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes associated with preoperative exercise training in NSCLC is warranted.
Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36170564      PMCID: PMC9519181          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012020.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  72 in total

1.  American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Kerry S Courneya; Charles Matthews; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Daniel A Galvão; Bernardine M Pinto; Melinda L Irwin; Kathleen Y Wolin; Roanne J Segal; Alejandro Lucia; Carole M Schneider; Vivian E von Gruenigen; Anna L Schwartz
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

3.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

4.  Factors related to daily life interference in lung cancer patients: a cross-sectional regression tree study.

Authors:  Hsueh-Hsing Pan; Kuan-Chia Lin; Shung-Tai Ho; Chun-Yu Liang; Shih-Chun Lee; Kwua-Yun Wang
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.398

Review 5.  Complications of lung resection and exercise capacity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Benzo; George A Kelley; Laura Recchi; Albert Hofman; Frank Sciurba
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 6.  Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Bernard McCarthy; Dympna Casey; Declan Devane; Kathy Murphy; Edel Murphy; Yves Lacasse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-23

7.  Effects of exercise training in people with non-small cell lung cancer before lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francis-Edouard Gravier; Pauline Smondack; Guillaume Prieur; Clement Medrinal; Yann Combret; Jean-François Muir; Jean-Marc Baste; Antoine Cuvelier; Fairuz Boujibar; Tristan Bonnevie
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Impairments after curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with age and gender-matched healthy controls.

Authors:  Vinicius Cavalheri; Sue Jenkins; Nola Cecins; Kevin Gain; Martin Phillips; Lucas H Sanders; Kylie Hill
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.415

9.  Short-term inpatient-based high-intensive pulmonary rehabilitation for lung cancer patients: is it feasible and effective?

Authors:  Kun Zhou; Jianhua Su; Yutian Lai; Pengfei Li; Shuangjiang Li; Guowei Che
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Authors:  Martijn A Spruit; Sally J Singh; Chris Garvey; Richard ZuWallack; Linda Nici; Carolyn Rochester; Kylie Hill; Anne E Holland; Suzanne C Lareau; William D-C Man; Fabio Pitta; Louise Sewell; Jonathan Raskin; Jean Bourbeau; Rebecca Crouch; Frits M E Franssen; Richard Casaburi; Jan H Vercoulen; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Rik Gosselink; Enrico M Clini; Tanja W Effing; François Maltais; Job van der Palen; Thierry Troosters; Daisy J A Janssen; Eileen Collins; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Dina Brooks; Bonnie F Fahy; Milo A Puhan; Martine Hoogendoorn; Rachel Garrod; Annemie M W J Schols; Brian Carlin; Roberto Benzo; Paula Meek; Mike Morgan; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken; Andrew L Ries; Barry Make; Roger S Goldstein; Claire A Dowson; Jan L Brozek; Claudio F Donner; Emiel F M Wouters
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.