Peisi Xie1, Hongna Zhang1, Pengfei Wu1, Yanyan Chen1, Zongwei Cai1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract
The application of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to explore the responses of cancer cell spheroids (CCS) after treatment of exogenous molecules has attracted growing attention. Increasing studies have utilized MSI to image the two-dimensional distributions of exogenous and endogenous molecules in planar CCS sections. However, because CCS are volumetric and heterogenous, maintaining their three-dimensional (3D) information is essential for acquiring a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and mechanisms of action of exogenous molecules. Here, an established method of 3D MSI was applied to distinguish the distributions of triclosan sulfate and endogenous lipids in three microregions of colon CCS with an enhanced growth induced by the treatment of triclosan, a common antimicrobial agent. The results of 3D MSI showed that triclosan sulfate gradually accumulated from the periphery to the entire structure of CCS and finally localized in the core region. Spatial lipidomics analysis revealed that the upregulated phosphatidylethanolamine (fold change (FD) = 1.26, p = 0.0021), phosphatidylinositol (FD = 1.17, p = 0.0180), and phosphatidylcholine (FD = 1.22, p = 0.0178) species mainly distributed in the outer proliferative region, while the upregulated sphingomyelin (FD = 1.18, p = 0.024) species tended to distribute in the inner necrotic region. Our results suggest that a competitive mechanism between inhibiting and promoting CCS growth might be responsible for the proliferation of CCS treated with triclosan.
The application of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to explore the responses of cancer cell spheroids (CCS) after treatment of exogenous molecules has attracted growing attention. Increasing studies have utilized MSI to image the two-dimensional distributions of exogenous and endogenous molecules in planar CCS sections. However, because CCS are volumetric and heterogenous, maintaining their three-dimensional (3D) information is essential for acquiring a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and mechanisms of action of exogenous molecules. Here, an established method of 3D MSI was applied to distinguish the distributions of triclosan sulfate and endogenous lipids in three microregions of colon CCS with an enhanced growth induced by the treatment of triclosan, a common antimicrobial agent. The results of 3D MSI showed that triclosan sulfate gradually accumulated from the periphery to the entire structure of CCS and finally localized in the core region. Spatial lipidomics analysis revealed that the upregulated phosphatidylethanolamine (fold change (FD) = 1.26, p = 0.0021), phosphatidylinositol (FD = 1.17, p = 0.0180), and phosphatidylcholine (FD = 1.22, p = 0.0178) species mainly distributed in the outer proliferative region, while the upregulated sphingomyelin (FD = 1.18, p = 0.024) species tended to distribute in the inner necrotic region. Our results suggest that a competitive mechanism between inhibiting and promoting CCS growth might be responsible for the proliferation of CCS treated with triclosan.
Three-dimensional (3D) imaging is favorable
to be applied in life
sciences because biological processes consist of multiple 3D phenomena
including the dynamic changes of drug metabolism in targeted organs
and the formation and development of highly heterogenous solid tumors.[1] Current traditional 3D imaging techniques (e.g.,
positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
and ultrasound and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT))
have been widely used to display organs or body anatomy by tracing
fluid molecules or a particular chemical.[1] However, these techniques are not useful in spatial lipidomics or
proteomics that are composed of techniques of mass spectrometry-based
omics and molecular imaging due to their low-throughput character.
3D mass spectrometry imaging (3D MSI) is an innovative, label-free,
and in situ molecular imaging technique with a great potential in
spatial proteomics and lipidomics.[2] It
allows to identify the localization of hundreds of endogenous (e.g.,
lipids, peptides, protein) and exogenous (e.g., drugs, environmental
pollutants) molecules in one experiment. It has wide coverages and
applications in complex biological systems from single cell to whole-body
animals.[3,4] In addition, in common with two-dimensional
(2D) MSI, 3D MSI also can be integrated with MS/MS analysis and staining
techniques (e.g., immunohistochemistry) for the identification and
annotation of biomolecular species.[5]Traditionally, 2D cancer cell culture has been commonly utilized
in anticancer drug screening and environmental toxicological studies.[6] However, cells that grow in monolayers are unable
to mimic the 3D cellular architecture observed in the human body,
which may result in inaccurate assessments of the effects of exogenous
compounds on tumor tissues. Compared with 2D cancer cell models, 3D
cancer cell models such as cancer cell spheroids (CCS) have more similar
characteristics including the spatial structure, gene expression levels,
cell–cell interaction, growth kinetics, and physical barriers
with solid tumors.[7] For instance, owing
to the limited diffusion of nutrients and oxygen, CCS with diameters
larger than 500 μm display three cell layers with different
cellular states. These three layers contain the outer proliferative
area, the middle quiescent area, and the inner necrotic area. Similar
internal structures include the parenchyma area containing proliferative
and quiescent cells and the necrotic area containing dead cells could
also be found in solid tumors. Therefore, in cancer research, CCS
have attracted an increasing attention as a promising and valuable
in vitro model to evaluate the effect of exogenous molecules on cancer
progression.Since the first study of protein distributions
in CCS using matrix-assisted
laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) MSI in 2011,[8] many other studies using MSI have investigated the responses
of CCS after treatment of different exogenous molecules.[9−11] Most of these studies focused on using MSI to image the 2D distributions
of exogenous and altered endogenous molecules in planar CCS sections,
which lead to the acquirement of the incomplete spatial information
of molecules in CCS.[12,13] One previous study[10] utilized a total of seven CCS sections to investigate
the time-dependent penetration of one anticancer drug in colon CCS.
These selected seven sections of one cell spheroid could mimic the
3D structure of the cell spheroid. However, the detailed procedure
for establishing the 3D MSI in a stacked way for one cell spheroid
or two cell spheroids in drug-treated and -untreated groups is still
lacking. The stacked 3D MSI of CCS may contribute to acquiring a better
understanding of the tumor microenvironment and mechanisms of action
of exogenous molecules.Triclosan (TCS) is an antimicrobial
agent that has been extensively
used in over 2000 consumer products, including soaps, mouthwashes,
toothpastes, and cosmetics.[14] Because of
the wide use of this agent, it was frequently detected in the human
body, raising emerging concern about its impact on human health.[14] Yang et al. reported that exposure to TCS in
mice increased colonic tumorigenesis, tumor size, and colonic inflammation
possibly by modulating the toll-like receptor 4 signaling and gut
microbiota.[15] Their in vitro study showed
that TCS treatment induced elevated expression levels of proinflammatory
chemokines and cytokines in mouse colon cancer cells.[16] However, little is known about the effects of TCS exposure
on colon cancer at the metabolic level.Lipids are a branch
of metabolites that play crucial roles in many
cellular functions, such as signal transduction, protein trafficking,
and energy storage.[4] Numerous studies suggested
that alterations of lipid metabolism in cancer cells are closely associated
with many cellular processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis,
and differentiation.[17] For example, Zhou
et al. utilized graphene oxide as a MALDI matrix to investigate the
lipid distribution in mouse breast cancer tissues.[18] Interestingly, their data revealed that unsaturated fatty
acids (FA) with chain lengths of 20–22 carbon atoms (e.g.,
FA(20:4), FA(22:5), and FA(22:6)) tended to distribute in the necrotic
area, while FA with chain lengths of 16–18 carbon atoms (e.g.,
FA(16:0), FA(18:1), and FA(22:6) tended to distribute in the parenchyma
area. One study investigated the effect of an anticancer drug (irinotecan)
on the lipid metabolism of HCT116 colon CCS.[17] It demonstrated that drug treatment induced a significant up-regulation
of glycerolipids (GLs, e.g., triglyceride (TG)) and glycerophospholipids
(GPs, e.g., phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE),
and phosphatidic acid (PA)) that are essential for energy storage
and membrane structure. Because of the multifunctionality of lipids
and heterogeneity of CCS, a deeper understanding on changes of lipid
abundance and distribution in CCS after the treatment of exogenous
compounds (e.g., TCS) is essential, which could provide insights into
lipid-mediated processes and related toxic mechanisms.In this
present work, CCS generated by HCT116 human colon cancer
cells were exposed to TCS to explore its effect on CCS growth. The
method of 3D MSI for CCS was established and employed to observe the
time-dependent penetration of TCS sulfate (TCSS, one major phase II
metabolite of TCS). To explore TCS metabolism in CCS, we performed
the quantitative analysis of TCS and TCSS in CCS and culture medium
at different time points by using liquid chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). In addition, 3D MSI combined
with MS-based lipidomics was utilized to analyze the variations of
distribution and abundance of lipids between control and exposed groups
to uncover the effect of enhanced growth of HCT116 CCS treated with
TCS.
Experimental Section
Chemical and Reagents
Chloroform,
ethanol (EtOH), methanol
(MeOH), isopropanol (IPA), acetonitrile (ACN), ammonium acetate, ammonium
hydroxide solutions (30%), dichloromethane (DCM), and formic acid
were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Gibco RPMI Media 1640
(GRM1640), 4-chloro-phenylalanine (4-cl-Phe), fetal bovine serum (FBS),
trypsin (0.25%), and penicillin–streptomycin (100 U/mL) were
purchased from Thermo Fisher (Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.). Trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-2-propenylidene]malononitrile
(DCTB), 9-acridinamine (9AA), 1,5-diaminonaphthalene (1,5-DAN), 3-aminoquinoline
(3-AQ), and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine (PNA) were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). Lysophosphatidylcholine
(19:0) (LPC(19:0)) and ceramide (d18:1/17:0) (Cer(d18:1/17:0)) were
purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, U.S.A.). TCS was
purchased from TCI Chemicals (Tokyo, Japan). TCS glucuronide (TCSG)
and TCS sulfate (TCSS) were synthesized in our laboratory.[19]
Preparation of CCS and Treatment of TCS
The HCT116
colorectal carcinoma cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, U.S.A.) were grown
in GRM1640 complete medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.S.A.). A total
of 200 μL of medium containing 5000 cells was added into each
inner well of ultralow attachment 96-well plates (Corning Inc., Cornish,
ME, U.S.A.). Plates were placed in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After three days in culture, medium (100 μL)
was changed every two days.On day three in culture, CCS were
exposed to various concentrations of TCS (final concentrations: 0.1,
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 μM). A total of 100 μL
of culture medium containing different concentrations of TCS was replaced
every 48 h. An inverted microscope (Leica, Germany) was used to measure
the spheroid area every 48 h at 5× magnification. On day 16 in
culture, 0.25% trypsin (100 μL) was added into each well for
60 min. The cell number of each cell spheroid was counted by using
an automated cell counter.
MALDI-MS Analysis
Matrices, PNA
(7 mg/mL), and 1,5-DAN
(7 mg/mL), were dissolved in pure ACN. DCTB (7 mg/mL) matrices were
dissolved in pure DCM. Matrices, 9AA and 3-AQ, were dissolved pure
MeOH and EtOH, respectively. To optimize the matrix for detecting
TCS, TCSS, and TCSG, a total of 1 μL of different matrices was
respectively mixed with 1 μL of standard solutions containing
TCS (2 μM), TCSS (2 μM), and TCSG (2 μM). A total
of 0.5 μL of the above mixture was added onto a stainless-steel
plate. Three replicates were performed for each matrix. The MS spectra
were obtained by using a vacuum rapiflex MALDI-TOF Tissuetyper (Bruker
Daltonics, Germany) with a laser power (80%) and a scan range (m/z 100–1000).
Establishment of 3D MSI
for CCS
Gelatin solution (175
mg/mL in ultrapure water) in a 50 mL tube was placed in a water bath
for 30 min at 70 °C. A total of 120 μL of warm gelation
solution was added in each well of the 96-well plate by a 200 μL
manicured tip (Figure S1A). One cell spheroid
was washed with normal saline 3 times and transferred into the well
by a new 200 μL manicured tip (Figure S1B). The cell spheroid was moved carefully to the center area of the
well by a 10 μL tip. Until the gelatin hardened into a solid,
60 μL of warm gelation was added to cover the cell spheroid
(Figure S1C). The plate was stored at −20
°C for 1 h before taking it out for 20 min at room temperature.
A 15 cm steel needle was used to scoop the gelatin block out. The
block was sliced into 14 μm thick sections. All sections containing
cell spheroids were thaw-mounted on an indium tin oxide slide (Figure S1D), dried in a vacuum desiccator, and
stored at −80 °C before matrix deposition.Matrices,
DCTB (5 mg/mL) and DHB (15 mg/mL) were dissolved in pure DCM and 90%
MeOH, respectively. Matrices were deposited on indium tin oxide (ITO)
slides by using an airbrush (Figure S1E). The total of 10 mL of DCTB matrix and 5 mL of DHB matrix were
deposited on each ITO slide. The MSI experiment was performed by using
a rapifleX MALDI-TOF Tissuetyper equipped with a smartbeam 3D laser
(Figure S1F). The laser power, scan range,
and resolution were set at 86%, m/z 100–1000,
and 50 μm, respectively.For the creation of 3D image
of one cell spheroid (Video S1), all raw
data of consecutive sections
from one spheroid on culture day 15 were imported into SCiLS Lab MVS
version 2020b (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). For CCS with diameters
around 800–1000 μm, 40–60 sections could be obtained
for each spheroid. These sections that belong to one cell spheroid
were placed on the same ITO slide. The data were processed by the
segmentation analysis under the normalization method of the total
ion count. All ion images were processed with the weak-denoising method.
According to the obtained segmentation map, we created and renamed
the new polygonal region for each CCS section (Figure S1G). The new regions were selected from the section
1 to the last section and overlapped in order without adjusting the x and y coordinates (Figures S1H and S2A). The regions from section 1 and the middle
section were overlapped in order to create the half spheroid (Figure S2B). For the establishment of the quarter
spheroid, the clapping plane is moved from the top of the half spheroid
(Figure S2C) to the side of the half spheroid
(Figure S2D). The clapping plane is moved
forward to the middle region of the half spheroid (Figure S2E). The quarter spheroid was shown from the horizon
view (Figure S2F). The thickness of all
sections was set as 14 μm. The value of the z coordinate of “section 1” was set as 14 μm.
These values would increase automatically based on the number of overlapped
sections.For the comparison of the differences in the spatial
distribution
of endogenous lipids between control and TCS-treated groups, the raw
data of consecutive sections from half spheroids on culture day 15
in two groups were imported into the software. The new regions were
selected from the section 1 of the cell spheroid in the TCS-treated
group to the middle section of the cell spheroid in the control group.
The regions of the cell spheroid in the TCS-treated group were overlapped
in order without adjusting the x and y coordinates (Figure S1I). When aligning
the middle section of the cell spheroid in the TCS-treated group and
the section 1 of the cell spheroid in the control group, we adjusted
the y coordinate to move the section 1 to the right
side of the middle section and overlaid the remaining sections in
order without any adjusting of two coordinates (Figure S1I and Video S2). In order
to obtain more inner distribution information of molecules in cell
spheroids, we established the quarter spheroids by moving the clipping
plane from outside to inside to cut the half spheroids (Figure S1J and Video S3). The 3D ion images were viewed in the volume mode. The scale bar
was set according to the value of z coordinate of
the cell spheroid.
Processing and Analysis of MSI Data
MSI data were imported
into software of SCiLS Lab 2016a (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) and processed
by the unsupervised segmentation analysis. The method of the total
ion count was chosen to normalize the data. The minimal interval width
was set at ±0.10 Da. All ion images were processed with the weak-denoising
method. The probabilistic latent semantic analysis (pLSA) with random
initialization was performed to discriminate the metabolic differences
among different regions of TCS-treated and control groups. To confirm
the significant changed lipids from MALDI-MSI data, statistical comparison
of 15 CCS sections from three cell spheroids (five middle sections
in one cell spheroid) in each group was performed by using the paired
t test. Lipids were identified by MALDI-MS/MS using a timsTOF flex
MALDI-2 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
Results and Discussion
Establishment
of 3D MSI for CCS
Previous work reported
that the cell spheroid contains three areas because of the existence
of gradients of oxygen and nutrients.[7] The
existence of the three areas, including the proliferative area (baby
blue), quiescent area (yellow), and necrotic area (brown), was proven
by the segmentation analysis of one section of the HCT116 cell spheroid
(Figure A–C).
The plots of probabilistic latent semantic analysis (pLSA) at 95%
confidence intervals showed that there were clear separations among
three areas (Figure D), indicating significant differences in metabolic characteristics
among cells within three areas. The corresponding loading plot (Figure S3) for the principle component 1 and
2 showed seven ions at m/z 8885.5, 886.6, 887.6,
861.5, 835.5, 864.6, and 863.6 that distributed outside of the 95%
confidence ellipse. These ions were identified as important variables
that contributed to discriminating different areas of CCS. After constructing
the 3D model for full cell spheroids, we found that some lipids, such
as sphingomyelin(d31:1) (SM(d31:1)), distributed in the necrotic area
(Figure E, top row).
However, in the 3D model for the full cell spheroid, the information
of internal distribution of molecules in cell spheroids could not
be seen (Figures E
and S4, top row). Hence, we established
the 3D model for the half spheroid (Figure S2B) by overlapping half the number of sections of the cell spheroid.
From the vertical view of the half spheroid, we found that some lipids
(e.g., phosphatidylinositol (36:3) PI(36:3)) distributed in the entire
area and some lipids, such as phosphatidylethanolamine (38:4) (PE(38:4)),
PI(40:5), and PI(38:4), predominantly located in the proliferative
area (Figures E and S4, middle row). In addition, some lipids (e.g.,
PI(34:1), (PE(O-36:2), PE(O-36:3)) were found to locate in the quiescent
and necrotic areas from the view of the full spheroid (Figures E and S4, top row). However, from the vertical view of the half
spheroid, these lipids were found to distribute more in the necrotic
area (Figures E and S4, middle row).
Figure 1
(A) Optical map of one section of the
cell spheroid. (B) Segmentation
map of one section of the cell spheroid. (C) Tree map. (D) pLSA score
plot. (E) Region-specific distribution of lipids in the cell spheroid.
The scale bars in all 3D ion images were 200 μm. The direction
of the white arrows indicated the moving direction of the clipping
planes.
(A) Optical map of one section of the
cell spheroid. (B) Segmentation
map of one section of the cell spheroid. (C) Tree map. (D) pLSA score
plot. (E) Region-specific distribution of lipids in the cell spheroid.
The scale bars in all 3D ion images were 200 μm. The direction
of the white arrows indicated the moving direction of the clipping
planes.The vertical view of the half
spheroid provides
an accurate information
of the horizontal distribution of biomolecules (Figure S2C ,D), but it cannot provide the information of the
vertical distribution. Thus, we cut the half spheroid by moving the
clapping plane to establish the quarter spheroid (Figure S2E). The results demonstrated that under the horizontal
view of the quarter spheroid (Figures E and S4, bottom row), some
lipids (e.g., PE(38:4), PI(40:5), PI(38:4)) exhibited 3D hollow inner
distributions and some lipids (e.g., PI(34:1), (PE(O-36:2), PE(O-36:3))
showed 3D high-intensity central distributions (Figure S5). Taken together, the vertical view of half spheroids
and the horizontal view of quarter spheroids were chosen to investigate
the distribution of molecules in the following MSI experiments.
Time-Dependent Distribution of TCSS in Colonic CCS
In MALDI
analysis, the choice of matrix plays important roles in
detecting particular molecules with high and sensitive MS signal responses.[20] Hence, we optimized matrix to detect 1 μM
of TCS and its two major metabolites (TCSS and TCS glucuronide (TCSG))
by using MALDI-TOF MS in negative ionization mode. In this study,
9-aminoacidine (9AA), 1,5- diaminonaphthalene (1,5-DAN), 3-aminoquinoline
(3-AQ), N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine (PNA), and Trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-2-propenylidene]malononitrile
(DCTB) were used. The spectra of these five matrices (Figure S6) showed that no matrix peaks interfered
with TCS and TCSS detection. It should be noted that because of the
presence of chlorine-35 and chlorine-37, both of [TCS–H]− and [TCSS – H]− have two
major ion peaks (Figure A, B). TCS-related ions ([TCS–H]− at m/z 286.9 and 288.9) were detected in DCTB and 1,5-DAN matrices
(Figure A). The TCSS-related
ions ([TCSS – H]− at m/z 366.9 and 368.9) were detected in DCTB, PNA, 1,5-DAN, and 9AA matrices
(Figure B). The TCSG-related
ions were not determined in these five matrices. Among these matrices,
DCTB showed the highest intensity signal of deprotonated ions of TCS
and TCSS. The intensity signal of [TCSS – H]− ions was about 20-fold higher than that of [TCSS – H]− ions by using the DCTB matrix (Figure A, B). In order to confirm the detection
ability of DCTB for TCS and TCSS in HCT116 CCS, we acquired the MS
spectra on DCTB-sprayed sections of CCS after TCS (10 μM) treatment
by using MALDI-TOF MS. However, only the TCSS-related ion could be
observed on CCS sections (Figure S7), which
may be because TCSS demonstrates a higher signal response compared
to TCS. Other possible reasons include that TCS has been largely metabolized
to its metabolites (e.g., TCSS). Therefore, the DCTB matrix was chosen
to detect TCSS in the following MSI experiments.
Figure 2
Optimization of matrix
and time-dependent distribution of TCSS
in colonic CCS. (A) Ion peaks of 1 μM TCS with different matrices.
Asterisks indicated detected ion peaks of TCS. (B) Ion peaks of 1
μM TCSS with different matrices. Asterisks indicated detected
ion peaks of TCSS. (C) Distribution of the TCSS ion (m/z 366.9) in CCS at different time points. Because of the presence
of chlorine-35 and chlorine-37, both of [TCS–H]− and [TCSS – H]− have two major ion peaks.
The scale bars in all 3D ion images were 200 μm. The direction
of the white arrows indicated the moving direction of the clipping
planes.
Optimization of matrix
and time-dependent distribution of TCSS
in colonic CCS. (A) Ion peaks of 1 μM TCS with different matrices.
Asterisks indicated detected ion peaks of TCS. (B) Ion peaks of 1
μM TCSS with different matrices. Asterisks indicated detected
ion peaks of TCSS. (C) Distribution of the TCSS ion (m/z 366.9) in CCS at different time points. Because of the presence
of chlorine-35 and chlorine-37, both of [TCS–H]− and [TCSS – H]− have two major ion peaks.
The scale bars in all 3D ion images were 200 μm. The direction
of the white arrows indicated the moving direction of the clipping
planes.The penetration of drugs and their
metabolites
into tumor tissues
is essential for evaluating the effects of drugs on tumor growth.[21] In order to investigate the distribution of
these compounds in tumor tissues, traditional imaging methods such
as PET, MRI, and fluorescence imaging (FI) have been used, which either
have a low spatial resolution (millimeter level, for example, PET
and MRT) or need a time-consuming labeling procedure (e.g., FI).[22] MALDI-MSI is a label-free imaging technology
that provides a better spatial resolution for cancer research.[23] Therefore, MALDI MSI was employed to map the
distribution of TCSS in HCT116 CCS exposed to TCS (10 μM) at
different time points. Each time point contained three cell spheroids. Figures C, S7, and S8 showed that no signals of [TCSS – H]− were detected in the cell spheroid in the blank group,
suggesting that no endogenous metabolites interfered with TCSS detection.
At the time points of 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h of TCS treatment,
TCSS gradually spread into cell spheroids from the periphery region
to the inner region. At 12 h of TCS treatment, TCSS distributed in
the entire structure of the cell spheroid. At the time points of 24
and 48 h of treatment, TCSS was found to be intense in the core of
cell spheroids.The previous study demonstrated that with increasing
exposure time,
irinotecan (one anticancer drug) gradually penetrated into HCT116
cell spheroids from the outer region to the center region and eventually
distributed in the entire structure of cell spheroids.[10] Thus, we speculated that TCS might have this
similar penetration behavior. The penetration of TCS into CCS is accompanied
by the release of TCSS. Owing to the different metabolic rates of
three areas in cell spheroids (necrotic area < quiescent area <
proliferative area),[24] TCSS penetrating
into the center area might gradually accumulate, while a portion of
TCSS in the outer area might be released into the culture medium.
This might account for the accumulation of TCSS in the core of cell
spheroids after 24 h of TCS treatment.
TCS Metabolism in Colonic
CCS
In human living cells,
it is generally believed that TCS could be converted into TCSS and
TCSG by the phase II metabolism.[19] In order
to confirm this, we first measured the content of TCS, TCSS, and TCSG
in culture medium without cell spheroids or with dead cell spheroids.
The results (Figure S9) showed that only
TCS was detected in culture medium and the content of TCS remained
unchanged with increasing time. However, when TCS was added into the
culture medium containing living cell spheroids, both TCS and TCSS
were detected in culture medium (Figure ), suggesting that TCSS could be produced
by TCS only in the presence of living cell spheroids. The content
of TCSG in culture medium was below the instrumental detection limit.
Figure 3
Determination
of TCS and TCSS in HCT116 cell spheroids and culture
medium at different exposure time. (A) Content of TCS in cell spheroids.
(B) Content of TCSS in cell spheroids. (C) Content of TCS in the culture
medium. (D) Content of TCSS in the culture medium. Each group contained
five sample replicates. Each sample contained five cell spheroids
or 1 mL of culture medium. Error bars represent SEM. The statistical
analysis was performed between adjacent time points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Determination
of TCS and TCSS in HCT116 cell spheroids and culture
medium at different exposure time. (A) Content of TCS in cell spheroids.
(B) Content of TCSS in cell spheroids. (C) Content of TCS in the culture
medium. (D) Content of TCSS in the culture medium. Each group contained
five sample replicates. Each sample contained five cell spheroids
or 1 mL of culture medium. Error bars represent SEM. The statistical
analysis was performed between adjacent time points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.To investigate the metabolism
of TCS in HCT116
CCS, we further
used LC–MS/MS to measure the content of TCS and TCSS in CCS
and culture medium at different exposure time. The MS spectra of TCS
and TCSS in blank samples of CCS and culture medium (Figure S10) showed negligible signals of TCS and TCSS ions,
suggesting that no endogenous compounds interfered with TCS and TCSS
detection. As shown in Figure B and Table S1, the content of
TCSS in CCS gradually increased and then reached a plateau after 24
h of TCS treatment. The content of TCSS in the culture medium augmented
gradually (Figure D and Table S1), which may be due to the
continuous release process of TCSS from CCS. For TCS in CCS, its content
gradually increased and then gradually reduced after 12 h of treatment
(Figure A and Table S1), while the content of TCS in the medium
remained unchanged and then decreased after 12 h of treatment (Figure C and Table S1). This may be because before 12 h of
treatment, the metabolic rate of TCS is slower than its penetrating
rate. Meanwhile, as the content of TCS in culture medium is far more
than that in CCS, the biotransformation of TCS in CCS would not lead
to an obvious decreasing content of TCS in the medium. However, after
12 h of treatment, the penetrating rate of TCS may be slower than
its metabolic rate, which leads to the reduced content of TCS in both
CCS and culture medium.
CCS Growth after TCS Exposure
In
order to assess the
effect of TCS on the growth of HCT116 CCS, CCS were treated with different
concentrations of TCS from day 3 to day 15 in culture. As shown in Figure A, the area of HCT116
CCS in the control group gradually increased. The relative area in
the 25 μM TCS-treated group gradually decreased, while a slow
increase in the relative area was found in the 10 μM TCS-treated
group (Figure B).
On day 15 in culture, we found that the spheroid area in the 10 μM
TCS-treated group was significantly larger than that in the blank
group (Figure C).
However, a smaller spheroid area was observed in the 25 μM TCS-treated
group than in the blank group (Figure C). We further counted the cell number in different
groups. The results showed that the cell number in the 10 μM
TCS-treated group was significantly more than that in the blank group,
while a lesser number of cells was found in the 25 μM TCS-treated
group than in the blank group (Figure S11). Taken together, all these results indicated that the treatment
of HCT116 CCS with 10 μM TCS induced cell proliferation, while
treatment of HCT116 CCS with 25 μM TCS caused an inhibition
of cell growth. The inhibition effect may be due to the cytotoxic
effect of high-dose TCS exposure. Our results are similar to the results
reported in one previous study. In this study, the treatment of mice
(chemical-induced colon cancer model) with TCS at environmentally
relevant concentrations significantly increased the colitis-associated
colon tumorigeneis and tumor size.[15] In
addition, TCS could also promote the proliferation of hepatocytes,
lead to hepatocyte fibrosis, and act as a liver tumor promoter.[25,26] It should be noted that the treatment level (10 μM) used in
our study is lower than that (13 μM) detected in human urine.[27,28] Hence, 10 μM was chosen as the environmentally relevant exposure
concentration for further lipidomic and MSI analysis.
Figure 4
Effects of TCS exposure
on CCS growth and lipidomic analysis of
HCT116 CCS treated with TCS. (A) Growth curves of HCT116 CCS exposed
to various concentrations of TCS (n = 8). Spheroid
areas of exposure groups relative to the blank group were delineated
with line plots. (B) Areas of spheroids treated with 0, 10, and 25
μM TCS at different culture day. (C) Areas of HCT116 CCS exposed
to various concentrations of TCS on day 15 in culture (n = 8). (D) PLSDA analysis in negative and positive ionization modes
(n = 8). (E) Fold changes of different lipid classes
(n = 8). TCS (10 and 0 μM )-treated CCS on
day 15 in culture were used for lipidomic analysis. The error bars
represented SEM. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Effects of TCS exposure
on CCS growth and lipidomic analysis of
HCT116 CCS treated with TCS. (A) Growth curves of HCT116 CCS exposed
to various concentrations of TCS (n = 8). Spheroid
areas of exposure groups relative to the blank group were delineated
with line plots. (B) Areas of spheroids treated with 0, 10, and 25
μM TCS at different culture day. (C) Areas of HCT116 CCS exposed
to various concentrations of TCS on day 15 in culture (n = 8). (D) PLSDA analysis in negative and positive ionization modes
(n = 8). (E) Fold changes of different lipid classes
(n = 8). TCS (10 and 0 μM )-treated CCS on
day 15 in culture were used for lipidomic analysis. The error bars
represented SEM. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Lipidomic Analysis of HCT116 CCS after TCS Exposure
Lipids,
a branch of metabolites, play major roles in biological processes
including the constitution of cellular membranes, energy storage,
and cell signal transduction.[29] Previous
studies demonstrated that lipid disorders are closely associated with
tumor growth and development.[30,31] Thus, in order to investigate
the proliferative mechanisms modulated by lipid metabolism, we performed
the lipidomic analysis of HCT116 CCS on day 15 from the control and
exposure (10 μM TCS-treated CCS) groups by using LC–MS/MS.
The results of the partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLDSA)
showed clear separations between two groups in both negative and positive
ionization modes (Figure D). A stable instrumental performance was confirmed by the
clustered QC samples (Figure D). A total of 589 lipids were detected. Among these lipids,
a total of 137 lipids (Table S2) were found
significantly changed according to the threshold of the fold of change
(FC, < 0.8 or > 1.2) and the p value (p < 0.05). Among these lipids, a total of 55 lipids belonged
to glycerophospholipids, consisting of 24 PE, 20 phosphatidylcholines
(PC), 4 PI, 4 lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC), 1 phosphatidylglycerol
(PG), and 2 lysophosphatidylethanolamines (LPE). A total of 19 lipids
were sphingolipids, including 15 sphingomyelins (SM) and 4 ceramides
(Cer). The rest lipids were glycerolipids, involving 39 triglycerides
(TG) and 24 diacylglycerols (DG). The MS/MS information of some of
these lipids is listed in Figure S12.Given that different lipid classes have different biological functions,[29] we compared the levels of different lipid classes
in the control and TCS-treated groups. The results showed that significant
elevated levels of PC, PE, SM, PI, LPE, and DG were found after TCS
exposure (Figure E).
Among these lipid classes, PC and PE are two main glycerophospholipids
in cell membranes of all mammals. It has been shown that cancer cells
exhibit an enhanced synthesis of PC and PE acting as building blocks
of plasma membranes in order to achieve fast cell proliferation.[32] PI lipid species are required for the activation
of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway that
involves in mediating cell proliferation and survival.[33] SM is also found in the animal cell membrane,
which plays a major role in regulating cell inflammation and apoptosis.
It can be synthesized by transferring the phosphorylcholine from PC
to ceramide (Cer) in the presence of SM synthase.[34] Numerous studies demonstrated that administration of SM
to mice could inhibit the tumorigenesis and growth of colon cancer.[35−37] Thus, we speculated that TCS exposure induced the proliferation
of colonic CCS, which may be through the competition between inhibiting
and promoting CCS growth.
MALDI-MSI Analysis of HCT116 CCS after TCS
Exposure
MS-based lipidomics has been widely employed in
cancer research aimed
at finding new biomarkers and mechanisms of drug action.[38] In this technique, biological samples were crushed
and homogenized to extract lipids, which lead to the loss of information
of spatial distribution of lipids in biological samples. This information
might play an important role in clarifying the mechanisms of drug
action. Hence, MSI was applied to discover a deeper understanding
of the proliferative mechanism of HCT116 CCS induced by TCS exposure.
We initially further performed the analysis of the lipid profile from
three areas (entire area, proliferative area, and necrotic area) of
CCS sections to explore the changes in lipid levels between the blank
group and the TCS-treated group. The results of probabilistic latent
semantic analysis (pLSA) score plots showed that similar to the results
of LC data (Figure D), there were clear separations in these three areas of CCS sections
between the control and TCS (10 μM)-treated groups in both negative
and positive ionization modes (Figure A), suggesting an obvious alternation in lipid levels
after TCS exposure.
Figure 5
(A) pLSA score plots of MALDI-MSI profiles acquired from
the entire
area, necrotic area, and proliferative area (n =
15). (B) Representative ion images of lipids in the control and TCS-treated
groups. Each group contained three biological replicates. The scale
bars in all 3D ion images were 200 μm. The range of the direction
of the white arrows indicated the moving direction of the clipping
planes.
(A) pLSA score plots of MALDI-MSI profiles acquired from
the entire
area, necrotic area, and proliferative area (n =
15). (B) Representative ion images of lipids in the control and TCS-treated
groups. Each group contained three biological replicates. The scale
bars in all 3D ion images were 200 μm. The range of the direction
of the white arrows indicated the moving direction of the clipping
planes.LC–MS/MS data (Figure E) showed the upregulated
levels of six lipid
classes
(PE, PI, LPE, PC, DG, and SM) in CCS treated with TCS. In order to
reveal the changes in the spatial distribution of lipid species in
these six classes, the method of 3D MSI for CCS on culture day 15
in control and TCS (10 μM)-treated groups was employed. A total
of 17 significantly changed lipid species (Figures and S13) belonging
to PE, PI, PC, and SM were identified by MALDI-MS/MS (Figure S14). The statistical analysis of intensities
of these 17 lipids between control and TCS-treated groups is shown
in Figure S15 and Table S3. In negative
ionization mode, the signal intensities of eight PE lipid species
in the TCS-treated group were significantly higher than those in the
blank group (Figures B, S13, and S15). Among these lipids,
seven lipids (PE(18:1/20:4), PE(18:1/20:5), PE(18:1/18:2), PE(18:1p/20:4),
PE(18:1/18:1), PE(16:0/20:4), and PE(16:0/18:1) mainly distributed
in the outer region of CCS, while one lipid (PE(18:0/18:1) distributed
in the entire region of CCS. For PI, two upregulated lipids (PI(18:0/22:5)
and PI(18:0/20:4)) showed high intensity distributions in the proliferative
area of CCS, while one upregulated lipid (PI(18:0/18:1)) showed a
high intensity distribution in the inner region of CCS (Figures B, S13, and S15). In the positive ionization mode, compared with the
blank group, five PC lipid species in the TCS-treated group showed
higher signal intensities (Figures B, S13, and S15). Among
these lipids, four lipids including PC(32:1), PC(34:4), PC(34:1),
and PC(36:2) tended to distribute more in the outer region of CCS,
while one lipid (PC(36:1)) mainly distributed in the inner region.
For SM with an elevated level, it was predominantly found in the inner
region of CCS (Figures B and S15). This result was similar to
that of our previous work, which showed that all detected seven SMs
were found to predominantly locate in the necrotic area in liver CCS.[39] Taken together, these results showed that most
of the upregulated lipids (PE, PI, and PC) mainly distributed in the
outer proliferative region, while SM with elevated levels tended to
distribute in the inner necrotic region.Taken together, we
speculated that the accumulation of TCS in colonic
CCS (Figure A) would
inhibit cell growth by increasing the levels of SM in the inner region
of CCS (Figure B).
However, cells have their ways to protect themselves. They can convert
toxic chemicals (TCS) into nontoxic chemicals (TCSS) by the phase
II metabolism. Hence, after 12 h of TCS treatment, we can see that
cells in CCS tend to consume more TCS (Figure A) and store nontoxic TCSS (Figure C and Figure B). Also, a low concentration of TCS within
CCS may promote CCS growth. In the process of CCS growth, an enhanced
synthesis of PC and PE in the outer region of CCS (Figure B) to build more cell membrane
is required. Besides, elevated levels of PI in the outer region of
CCS (Figure B) may
also promote cancer cell proliferation by the activation of the PI3K
signaling pathway. Thus, the proliferative mechanism of HCT116 CCS
treated with TCS may involve the competition between inhibiting and
promoting CCS growth, which is indicated by the fluctuant content
of TCS in CCS, the accumulation of TCSS in CCS, upregulated levels
of SM in the inner region of CCS, and elevated levels of PC, PE, and
PI in the outer region of CCS.
Conclusions
A
method of 3D MSI for CCS was developed
and applied to investigate
the proliferative mechanism of HCT116 CCS induced by TCS exposure.
The time-dependent distribution of TCSS showed that TCSS gradually
penetrated from the outer region to the entire region of CCS and finally
concentrated in the inner region of CCS. The integrated analysis of
MALDI-MSI and LC–MS/MS revealed that TCS exposure caused obvious
metabolic disorders and asymmetric metabolite distributions in HCT116
CCS. The 3D MSI results showed that most of the upregulated lipids
(PE, PC, and PI) were observed to be intense in the proliferative
area of CCS, while SM with elevated levels predominantly distributed
in the necrotic area of CCS. These results suggested that a mechanism
between inhibiting and promoting colonic CCS growth might be responsible
for the proliferation of HCT116 CCS treated with TCS. Thus, the established
method of 3D MSI for CCS might offer a comprehensive and accurate
evaluation for the effect of exogenous compounds on cancer cells.
Authors: Evelien Rysman; Koen Brusselmans; Katryn Scheys; Leen Timmermans; Rita Derua; Sebastian Munck; Paul P Van Veldhoven; David Waltregny; Veerle W Daniëls; Jelle Machiels; Frank Vanderhoydonc; Karine Smans; Etienne Waelkens; Guido Verhoeven; Johannes V Swinnen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Eoin Fahy; Shankar Subramaniam; H Alex Brown; Christopher K Glass; Alfred H Merrill; Robert C Murphy; Christian R H Raetz; David W Russell; Yousuke Seyama; Walter Shaw; Takao Shimizu; Friedrich Spener; Gerrit van Meer; Michael S VanNieuwenhze; Stephen H White; Joseph L Witztum; Edward A Dennis Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2005-02-16 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Mei-Fei Yueh; Koji Taniguchi; Shujuan Chen; Ronald M Evans; Bruce D Hammock; Michael Karin; Robert H Tukey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Luísa Dória; Zita Cotrim; Bárbara Macedo; Cláudia Simões; Pedro Domingues; Luisa Helguero; M Rosário Domingues Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 4.872