Literature DB >> 36169963

Comparison of Work Relative Value Units for Outpatient Pediatric and Adult Dermatology Encounters.

Krittin J Supapannachart1, Zachary Wolner1, Allison E Miller2, Jeanette R Comstock2, Mengyu Di3, Leslie P Lawley1, Beth A Drolet2, Lauren A V Orenstein1.   

Abstract

Importance: Dermatologists with specialty training in pediatric dermatology are scarce, which can mean extended wait times and reduced access to care for patients. Lower compensation for pediatric dermatology visits compared with adult visits may affect physician career choice and contribute to workforce shortages. Objective: To evaluate differences in work relative value units (wRVUs) generated by pediatric and adult outpatient dermatology encounters. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from outpatient dermatology encounters at a single-site academic center in Atlanta, Georgia, from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2020. Encounters with patients younger than 18 years were classified as pediatric, and encounters with those 18 years or older were classified as adult. Encounters with missing data were excluded as were those generating 0 wRVUs, inpatient visits, nursing visits, postoperative encounters, cosmetic procedures, phototherapy visits, and Mohs surgery encounters. Main Outcomes and Measures: Work relative value units generated per encounter type were assessed through multivariable linear regression models adjusted for the potential confounder of sex.
Results: The study included 12 989 pediatric dermatology encounters (mean [SD] age, 7.3 [5.2] years; 7586 [58.4%] girls) and 78 057 adult dermatology encounters (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [18.9] years; 45 724 [58.6%] women). Pediatric encounters were associated with 0.23 (95% CI, 0.21-0.25; P < .001) fewer wRVUs than adult encounters after adjusting for sex. In a mediation analysis, biopsies and destruction of premalignant lesions explained 74.1% (95% CI, 69.6%-77.9%; P < .001) of the wRVU difference between pediatric and adult encounters. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found significant differences in wRVUs generated between adult and pediatric dermatology encounters that were largely attributable to biopsies and destruction of premalignant lesions. Policies that increase the value of cognitive services to be on par with procedural care may mitigate wRVU differences and improve reimbursement for pediatric dermatologists.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36169963      PMCID: PMC9520430          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   11.816


  6 in total

1.  Pediatric dermatology workforce shortage explained.

Authors:  Nanette B Silverberg
Journal:  Cutis       Date:  2018-11

Review 2.  Pediatric dermatology: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Brea Prindaville; Richard J Antaya; Elaine C Siegfried
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Income inequality between male and female clinical faculty at public academic dermatology departments.

Authors:  Lark Guss; Qinyu Chen; Chen Hu; Zach Guss; Sewon Kang; Anna Grossberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  Barriers to healthcare access in pediatric dermatology: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jeffrey Toy; Allison Gregory; Wingfield Rehmus
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Differences in Outpatient Dermatology Encounter Work Relative Value Units and Net Payments by Patient Race, Sex, and Age.

Authors:  Lauren A V Orenstein; Malik M Nelson; Zachary Wolner; Miriam J Laugesen; Zhensheng Wang; Rachel E Patzer; Robert A Swerlick
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  A cross-sectional study of no-show rates and factors contributing to nonattendance at 3 academic pediatric dermatology centers in the United States.

Authors:  Danielle N Brown; Bridget E Shields; Samarth Shrivastava; Katie Welsh; Adnan Mir; Joy Wan; Linda S Hynan; Lisa Arkin; Carrie Kovarik; Benjamin F Chong
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.527

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.